*/
Reflections by Jayne Drake, Senior Clerk, St Pauls Chambers
The recent Institute of Barristers’ Clerks (IBC) Awards evening was, for many of us, more than simply a celebration of achievement. As Chair of the Awards Committee and a member of the IBC Executive Committee, I was proud to help organise the first formal awards event in the organisation’s history, and particularly proud to see two members of the St Pauls Chambers clerking team in the regional categories.
The evening also prompted reflection on how the role of chambers professionals has evolved, and what the modern Bar needs from those who support it.
Clerking functions such as diary management, fee negotiation and the allocation of work remain fundamental to the successful operation of every chambers, but there are many additional demands. Chambers professionals today include practice managers, marketers, mentors, wellbeing advocates, business developers, front of house and client care teams, operational staff, relationship managers and trusted advisers. We need to understand not only the legal market, but also the ambitions, pressures upon, and personalities of the barristers we support.
That evolution reflects a broader truth: barristers are not all the same, and success looks different for everyone. Some barristers seek high-profile advocacy and leadership roles. Others prioritise flexibility, collegiate culture, intellectual challenge or long-term sustainability. The best chambers recognise that individuality. And the best clerks adapt to it.
In my experience, barristers rarely leave chambers simply because another set offers a marginally more competitive contribution structure. People stay where they feel supported. They stay where they are understood. They stay where they believe somebody is invested in their success – commercially, professionally and personally.
At St Pauls Chambers, these are conversations we have regularly: What sort of practice does this barrister want to build? What sort of professional life do they want in five or ten years’ time? What environment will allow them to thrive?
Across all practice areas, barristers are managing increasing workloads, court delays, financial uncertainty and wellbeing concerns. Chambers’ professionals experience many of those same pressures alongside the barristers they support, balancing operational demands, recruitment, practice development and the responsibility of helping members navigate a demanding profession. That shared experience has created a greater appreciation of the importance of culture, communication and genuine professional support.
Stability at the Bar can be more fragile than people imagine. Even successful sets with longstanding reputations are not immune from periods of division. We experienced disagreements ourselves – not about money in isolation, but fundamentally different views about what chambers should become, how we value the people who support the business of the Bar, and what investment in the future ought to look like. It was a reminder that chambers are ultimately communities of people before they are businesses.
Heraclitus’s philosophy of perpetual change reminds us that no institution or profession ever truly stands still. Chambers are no different. People arrive, people leave, priorities shift, and leadership passes from one generation to the next. The task for those entrusted with stewardship is not to resist change entirely, but to guide it with perspective and integrity.
Once emotions subsided, what remained was a group of people committed to preserving a chambers built on mutual support, professionalism and long-term sustainability. In many ways, the experience clarified who we are.
We are not seeking growth for its own sake, nor are we searching simply for the highest earners or the loudest personalities. We are looking for people who share a vision of chambers as a collective enterprise, one where success is measured not only financially, but in the quality of relationships, culture and professional trust that exist within it.
At their best, chambers are professional homes. Those that will thrive will not necessarily be those with the loudest marketing or the lowest contribution structures. They will be the chambers that understand people best. And that is the standard we continue to aspire to every day at St Pauls Chambers.

The inaugural Institute of Barristers’ Clerks Awards evening (pictured above) took place on Friday 8 May at Lincoln’s Inn.
Earlier this year, Counsel magazine published an article written by Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers about ‘making the leap’ and finding the place where lawyers can truly thrive. That phrase stayed with me because chambers should be more than simply a place from which barristers practise.

The recent Institute of Barristers’ Clerks (IBC) Awards evening was, for many of us, more than simply a celebration of achievement. As Chair of the Awards Committee and a member of the IBC Executive Committee, I was proud to help organise the first formal awards event in the organisation’s history, and particularly proud to see two members of the St Pauls Chambers clerking team in the regional categories.
The evening also prompted reflection on how the role of chambers professionals has evolved, and what the modern Bar needs from those who support it.
Clerking functions such as diary management, fee negotiation and the allocation of work remain fundamental to the successful operation of every chambers, but there are many additional demands. Chambers professionals today include practice managers, marketers, mentors, wellbeing advocates, business developers, front of house and client care teams, operational staff, relationship managers and trusted advisers. We need to understand not only the legal market, but also the ambitions, pressures upon, and personalities of the barristers we support.
That evolution reflects a broader truth: barristers are not all the same, and success looks different for everyone. Some barristers seek high-profile advocacy and leadership roles. Others prioritise flexibility, collegiate culture, intellectual challenge or long-term sustainability. The best chambers recognise that individuality. And the best clerks adapt to it.
In my experience, barristers rarely leave chambers simply because another set offers a marginally more competitive contribution structure. People stay where they feel supported. They stay where they are understood. They stay where they believe somebody is invested in their success – commercially, professionally and personally.
At St Pauls Chambers, these are conversations we have regularly: What sort of practice does this barrister want to build? What sort of professional life do they want in five or ten years’ time? What environment will allow them to thrive?
Across all practice areas, barristers are managing increasing workloads, court delays, financial uncertainty and wellbeing concerns. Chambers’ professionals experience many of those same pressures alongside the barristers they support, balancing operational demands, recruitment, practice development and the responsibility of helping members navigate a demanding profession. That shared experience has created a greater appreciation of the importance of culture, communication and genuine professional support.
Stability at the Bar can be more fragile than people imagine. Even successful sets with longstanding reputations are not immune from periods of division. We experienced disagreements ourselves – not about money in isolation, but fundamentally different views about what chambers should become, how we value the people who support the business of the Bar, and what investment in the future ought to look like. It was a reminder that chambers are ultimately communities of people before they are businesses.
Heraclitus’s philosophy of perpetual change reminds us that no institution or profession ever truly stands still. Chambers are no different. People arrive, people leave, priorities shift, and leadership passes from one generation to the next. The task for those entrusted with stewardship is not to resist change entirely, but to guide it with perspective and integrity.
Once emotions subsided, what remained was a group of people committed to preserving a chambers built on mutual support, professionalism and long-term sustainability. In many ways, the experience clarified who we are.
We are not seeking growth for its own sake, nor are we searching simply for the highest earners or the loudest personalities. We are looking for people who share a vision of chambers as a collective enterprise, one where success is measured not only financially, but in the quality of relationships, culture and professional trust that exist within it.
At their best, chambers are professional homes. Those that will thrive will not necessarily be those with the loudest marketing or the lowest contribution structures. They will be the chambers that understand people best. And that is the standard we continue to aspire to every day at St Pauls Chambers.

The inaugural Institute of Barristers’ Clerks Awards evening (pictured above) took place on Friday 8 May at Lincoln’s Inn.
Earlier this year, Counsel magazine published an article written by Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers about ‘making the leap’ and finding the place where lawyers can truly thrive. That phrase stayed with me because chambers should be more than simply a place from which barristers practise.

Reflections by Jayne Drake, Senior Clerk, St Pauls Chambers
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Jemima Coleman and Zoë Leventhal KC on the evolving global movement seeking to reframe how we view nature: to recognise that nature possesses inherent rights and to enshrine these rights in law
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base