*/
The UK has implemented the 2005 Framework Decision on mutual recognition of (court-ordered) financial penalties no longer subject to appeal. The implementing measures were included in the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008.
http://www.sparksproject.org/Userfiles/File%5CBriefing%20for%20MoJ%20Press%20Office%20MRFP%2025%20Sept09%20(2).pdf
The UK has implemented the 2005 Framework Decision on mutual recognition of (court-ordered) financial penalties no longer subject to appeal. The implementing measures were included in the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008.
http://www.sparksproject.org/Userfiles/File%5CBriefing%20for%20MoJ%20Press%20Office%20MRFP%2025%20Sept09%20(2).pdf
It’s been a particularly hectic period in both the political sphere and our working lives
Casey Randall explores the benefits of prenatal paternity testing and explains how the test is performed
Philip N Bristow explains how to unlock your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step
Kate West discusses how best to interpret a drug test report, and the common misconceptions about what can be learnt from a drug test
Ashley Hodgkinson looks at drug testing methods and some of the most common ways people try to cheat a drug test
Clerksroom Chambers has recruited Matthew Wildish from 3 Paper Buildings (3PB) to a newly created position of Director of Clerking. Matthew joined the team at Clerksroom on 1 June
How did the international DJ and BBC Radio 1Xtra presenter find his transition to the Criminal Bar? Mark Robinsons secrets of a successful career change and his perception-breaking projects
Barrister, historian, legal biographer it was pure serendipity that the whirlwind silk went into the law and found his niche as a bestselling author, finds David Rhodes
A reminder of whats at stake. By Stephen Akinsanya
Surely diversity of thought at the Bar is a good thing? Why are chambers shoehorning all applicants for pupillage into the same mould? Roxy Lackschewitz-Martin looks at the diagnostic gap and neurodiversity in pupillage applications
Should counsel be allowed to express a personal opinion about their cases in public, when they cannot do so in court? asks Patrick O'Connor QC
