*/
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
When a drug or alcohol test result is presented in family court proceedings, the stakes could not be higher.
Decisions about a child’s welfare, contact arrangements, or parental capacity may rest, at least in part, on the interpretation of that result.
For family law professionals instructing toxicology testing, understanding what goes into that interpretation is essential; a result that has not been properly contextualised could be misleading.
Central to the process are cut-off levels, but they are only part of the picture.
When a biological sample is analysed for drugs or alcohol, the laboratory measures the concentration of substances detected.
Cut-off levels are scientifically established thresholds that determine whether a detected concentration is reported as a confirmed positive result.
Their primary purpose is accuracy and fairness, ensuring that trace amounts acquired through passive or environmental exposure are not misattributed as evidence of active use. The so-called ‘cocaine kiss’ illustrates this, where a non-user could theoretically test positive following close contact with a cocaine user; a consequence of the way the drug dissolves in saliva.
At AlphaBiolabs, we follow the internationally-recognised cut-off guidelines set by the Society of Hair Testing (SoHT), whose recommendations are based on data from thousands of cases, cover a wide range of sample donors, and are reviewed regularly to reflect advancements in drug testing technology.
However, cut-off levels cannot account for biological variables, distinguish ingestion from contamination, or contextualise a result within the circumstances of the individual and the case.
Every AlphaBiolabs drug and alcohol test report is produced by a highly qualified Reporting Scientist with experience in forensic toxicology and/or family law.
Before any conclusion is reached, they consider a range of factors including:
A result interpreted solely by reference to a cut-off level may be technically accurate, but if it has not accounted for the biological variables affecting that sample, the findings of metabolite analysis, or the context provided by donor disclosures, it is not telling the full story.
Thorough and expert interpretation protects the integrity of the process, ensures that sample donors are treated fairly, and supports fully informed judicial decision-making.
AlphaBiolabs is a UKAS 17025-accredited laboratory (with Lab 51 extension for toxicology) and member of the Society of Hair Testing, with over 20 years’ experience supporting family law professionals, social workers and local authorities with court-admissible drug and alcohol testing.
To request a quote or discuss the requirements of your case, contact our New Enquiry team on 0333 600 1300, email testing@alphabiolabs.com, or complete our online quote form (alphabiolabs.co.uk/legal-test-forms).
When a drug or alcohol test result is presented in family court proceedings, the stakes could not be higher.
Decisions about a child’s welfare, contact arrangements, or parental capacity may rest, at least in part, on the interpretation of that result.
For family law professionals instructing toxicology testing, understanding what goes into that interpretation is essential; a result that has not been properly contextualised could be misleading.
Central to the process are cut-off levels, but they are only part of the picture.
When a biological sample is analysed for drugs or alcohol, the laboratory measures the concentration of substances detected.
Cut-off levels are scientifically established thresholds that determine whether a detected concentration is reported as a confirmed positive result.
Their primary purpose is accuracy and fairness, ensuring that trace amounts acquired through passive or environmental exposure are not misattributed as evidence of active use. The so-called ‘cocaine kiss’ illustrates this, where a non-user could theoretically test positive following close contact with a cocaine user; a consequence of the way the drug dissolves in saliva.
At AlphaBiolabs, we follow the internationally-recognised cut-off guidelines set by the Society of Hair Testing (SoHT), whose recommendations are based on data from thousands of cases, cover a wide range of sample donors, and are reviewed regularly to reflect advancements in drug testing technology.
However, cut-off levels cannot account for biological variables, distinguish ingestion from contamination, or contextualise a result within the circumstances of the individual and the case.
Every AlphaBiolabs drug and alcohol test report is produced by a highly qualified Reporting Scientist with experience in forensic toxicology and/or family law.
Before any conclusion is reached, they consider a range of factors including:
A result interpreted solely by reference to a cut-off level may be technically accurate, but if it has not accounted for the biological variables affecting that sample, the findings of metabolite analysis, or the context provided by donor disclosures, it is not telling the full story.
Thorough and expert interpretation protects the integrity of the process, ensures that sample donors are treated fairly, and supports fully informed judicial decision-making.
AlphaBiolabs is a UKAS 17025-accredited laboratory (with Lab 51 extension for toxicology) and member of the Society of Hair Testing, with over 20 years’ experience supporting family law professionals, social workers and local authorities with court-admissible drug and alcohol testing.
To request a quote or discuss the requirements of your case, contact our New Enquiry team on 0333 600 1300, email testing@alphabiolabs.com, or complete our online quote form (alphabiolabs.co.uk/legal-test-forms).
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
