Immigration – Leave to remain. There was no real prospect of the appellant Nepalese national succeeding on the argument that the Secretary of State's delay had caused her failure to produce a substitute confirmation of acceptance for studies. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the appellant's appeal, further held that there were considerable difficulties with the appellant's argument, not least establishing a duty to do more than provide a letter inviting her to submit a new confirmation in 60 days, identifying what the Secretary of State allegedly should have done or said and showing that that would have made a material difference.