*/
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Hair testing is an established tool in family proceedings, providing a retrospective view of drug and alcohol exposure over several months that’s particularly useful when combined with tests for recent use, using samples such as blood, oral fluid, or urine.
However, laboratory analysis is only part of the process. Expert interpretation, drawing on the broader circumstances of the case and the sample donor’s history, ensures results are interpreted fairly and accurately.
A common misconception is that a positive hair drug test automatically indicates illicit drug use. However, correct interpretation depends on several factors, including the substance, concentration, pattern across hair segments, and relevant background information.
For example, codeine metabolises in the body to morphine. Consequently, the detection of morphine in hair does not necessarily indicate direct morphine use and may simply reflect the use of a codeine-containing medication. Analysing the distribution pattern and concentration ratios of both drugs in hair is pivotal in distinguishing codeine use from morphine use.
Similarly, ADHD medications such as dexamphetamine can produce findings that overlap with illicit amphetamine use.
Incorrect conclusions could therefore be drawn if medical and prescription histories were not considered during interpretation.
Conversely, a negative drug or alcohol test result does not always prove that no substances were used. Hair testing is effective at identifying repeated or ongoing use, but a single, low-dose exposure – such as one-off cannabis or cocaine use – can be harder to detect. Similarly, hair alcohol testing for the biomarkers Ethyl Glucuronide (EtG) and Ethyl Palmitate (EtPa) is designed to identify chronic, excessive consumption, so a single drinking episode is unlikely to be detected by hair testing alone.
Combining hair and blood alcohol testing gives a more complete picture. PEth blood testing, for example, can detect a single drinking episode for up to 12 days after consumption.
Cosmetic treatments: Hair treatments such as excessive bleaching, dyeing and chemical straightening can alter the concentration of certain substances in hair.
For a hair alcohol test, EtG concentrations can be decreased by excessive bleaching or dyeing, while EtPa levels can be elevated by alcohol-based styling products such as sprays, gels or wax.
This does not mean these factors eliminate evidence of misuse or produce a false positive result. However, they must be considered by the Reporting Scientist during interpretation, and the sample collector will therefore always ask about and log any use of hair treatments and styling products when collecting the sample.
Environmental exposure: A child living in a household where drugs are regularly smoked or handled may show low-level findings that do not necessarily indicate active consumption. Modern laboratory procedures, including washing protocols and metabolite analysis, help distinguish environmental exposure from ingestion.
Segmented analysis: Head hair can be segmented into an approximate timeline of use, based on an average growth rate of 1cm per month. However, individual hair growth rates can vary with ethnicity, diet, health and other factors, which should all be considered when interpreting results.
Perhaps the most important principle in hair drug and alcohol testing is that results should never be interpreted in isolation. The laboratory result is just one piece of a wider evidential picture, with clinical history, prescriptions, disclosures and witness statements all contributing to a balanced assessment.
Similar analytical results may be obtained for two different people, yet the interpretation could be very different depending on the wider circumstances of each case.
AlphaBiolabs offers the UK’s most comprehensive portfolio of legally-instructed drug and alcohol testing services, backed by over 20 years’ experience supporting family law professionals, social workers and local authorities.
We are UKAS 17025-accredited (Lab 51 extension for toxicology), employ in-house toxicologists and Reporting Scientists with decades of collective experience, and offer free sample collection for legally-instructed tests at our nationwide walk-in centres.
To request a quote, contact our New Enquiry team on 0333 600 1300, email testing@alphabiolabs.com, or complete our online quote form at alphabiolabs.co.uk/form-drugalcohol-instant-quote/
Hair testing is an established tool in family proceedings, providing a retrospective view of drug and alcohol exposure over several months that’s particularly useful when combined with tests for recent use, using samples such as blood, oral fluid, or urine.
However, laboratory analysis is only part of the process. Expert interpretation, drawing on the broader circumstances of the case and the sample donor’s history, ensures results are interpreted fairly and accurately.
A common misconception is that a positive hair drug test automatically indicates illicit drug use. However, correct interpretation depends on several factors, including the substance, concentration, pattern across hair segments, and relevant background information.
For example, codeine metabolises in the body to morphine. Consequently, the detection of morphine in hair does not necessarily indicate direct morphine use and may simply reflect the use of a codeine-containing medication. Analysing the distribution pattern and concentration ratios of both drugs in hair is pivotal in distinguishing codeine use from morphine use.
Similarly, ADHD medications such as dexamphetamine can produce findings that overlap with illicit amphetamine use.
Incorrect conclusions could therefore be drawn if medical and prescription histories were not considered during interpretation.
Conversely, a negative drug or alcohol test result does not always prove that no substances were used. Hair testing is effective at identifying repeated or ongoing use, but a single, low-dose exposure – such as one-off cannabis or cocaine use – can be harder to detect. Similarly, hair alcohol testing for the biomarkers Ethyl Glucuronide (EtG) and Ethyl Palmitate (EtPa) is designed to identify chronic, excessive consumption, so a single drinking episode is unlikely to be detected by hair testing alone.
Combining hair and blood alcohol testing gives a more complete picture. PEth blood testing, for example, can detect a single drinking episode for up to 12 days after consumption.
Cosmetic treatments: Hair treatments such as excessive bleaching, dyeing and chemical straightening can alter the concentration of certain substances in hair.
For a hair alcohol test, EtG concentrations can be decreased by excessive bleaching or dyeing, while EtPa levels can be elevated by alcohol-based styling products such as sprays, gels or wax.
This does not mean these factors eliminate evidence of misuse or produce a false positive result. However, they must be considered by the Reporting Scientist during interpretation, and the sample collector will therefore always ask about and log any use of hair treatments and styling products when collecting the sample.
Environmental exposure: A child living in a household where drugs are regularly smoked or handled may show low-level findings that do not necessarily indicate active consumption. Modern laboratory procedures, including washing protocols and metabolite analysis, help distinguish environmental exposure from ingestion.
Segmented analysis: Head hair can be segmented into an approximate timeline of use, based on an average growth rate of 1cm per month. However, individual hair growth rates can vary with ethnicity, diet, health and other factors, which should all be considered when interpreting results.
Perhaps the most important principle in hair drug and alcohol testing is that results should never be interpreted in isolation. The laboratory result is just one piece of a wider evidential picture, with clinical history, prescriptions, disclosures and witness statements all contributing to a balanced assessment.
Similar analytical results may be obtained for two different people, yet the interpretation could be very different depending on the wider circumstances of each case.
AlphaBiolabs offers the UK’s most comprehensive portfolio of legally-instructed drug and alcohol testing services, backed by over 20 years’ experience supporting family law professionals, social workers and local authorities.
We are UKAS 17025-accredited (Lab 51 extension for toxicology), employ in-house toxicologists and Reporting Scientists with decades of collective experience, and offer free sample collection for legally-instructed tests at our nationwide walk-in centres.
To request a quote, contact our New Enquiry team on 0333 600 1300, email testing@alphabiolabs.com, or complete our online quote form at alphabiolabs.co.uk/form-drugalcohol-instant-quote/
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
