*/
Immigration – Removal. The six appellants challenged the respondent Secretary of State's removal decisions as being repugnant to their rights guaranteed by arts 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, relying on their serious medical conditions. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing five of the appeals, held that the appellants could not bring themselves within the exception contained in D v United Kingdom ((1997) 2 BHRC 273) and their plight, however grave, could not be alleviated by recourse to art 3 of the Convention. Further, three appellants' arguments concerning art 8 of the Convention were excluded and two appellants had no basis for those claims.
Immigration – Removal. The six appellants challenged the respondent Secretary of State's removal decisions as being repugnant to their rights guaranteed by arts 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, relying on their serious medical conditions. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing five of the appeals, held that the appellants could not bring themselves within the exception contained in D v United Kingdom ((1997) 2 BHRC 273) and their plight, however grave, could not be alleviated by recourse to art 3 of the Convention. Further, three appellants' arguments concerning art 8 of the Convention were excluded and two appellants had no basis for those claims.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Leah Arthur, a pupil, and her second seat supervisor, John Goss, share their perspectives on building a productive pupil-supervisor relationship
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
