*/
© AlphaBiolabs
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Substance misuse continues to play a significant role in family law proceedings, influencing decisions around safeguarding, parenting capacity and contact arrangements.
The latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) data confirms that drug use remains widespread, with millions of adults reporting recent use.
Although overall prevalence has remained broadly stable, the scale of misuse and changing profile of substances involved continue to present challenges for courts, reinforcing the need for proportionate, evidence-based drug testing in family proceedings.
The latest ONS figures underline the continued prevalence of drug misuse across England and Wales.
For the year ending March 2025:
While these levels have not increased markedly, they have also failed to decline, indicating that drug misuse remains a persistent issue.
For family courts, this translates into a steady flow of cases where historic or ongoing drug use must be carefully assessed.
The ONS data also challenges long-standing assumptions about who is most likely to misuse drugs. While younger adults continue to report the highest levels of use, there have been increases among older age groups (eg aged 45-54).
This shift is significant for family law, where substance misuse may arise in cases involving older parents or carers.
Socio-economic trends further complicate the picture, with higher rates of Class A drug use reported among higher-income households, undermining assumptions that serious drug misuse is confined to economically deprived groups.
For legal practitioners, these findings reinforce the importance of avoiding assumptions based on age, income or lifestyle. Instead, objective, court-admissible drug testing remains essential to accurately assess risk and safeguarding concerns.
Established substances continue to dominate patterns of misuse.
However, prevalence data alone does not fully reflect the complexity encountered in family law cases. In practice, courts are increasingly dealing with misuse of controlled prescription medications, new psychoactive substances and poly-drug combinations, many of which are not routinely included in standard testing panels.
This is particularly relevant where substances are taken without full awareness of their composition, or where prescribed drugs are misused, complicating disclosure and risk assessment.
Reliance on standard testing panels alone no longer provides a sufficiently accurate picture of an individual’s substance use, particularly where non-standard drugs or poly-drug use are involved.
In family proceedings, a narrow testing scope may fail to identify habitual or problematic use outside standard panels.
Additionally, symptoms of drug use often overlap across different substances, meaning that symptoms alone cannot be used to determine which drugs to test for.
Drug misuse remains a persistent feature of life in England and Wales, with patterns of use that are broad and increasingly complex. As drug use diversifies, testing strategies must evolve accordingly.

Substance misuse continues to play a significant role in family law proceedings, influencing decisions around safeguarding, parenting capacity and contact arrangements.
The latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) data confirms that drug use remains widespread, with millions of adults reporting recent use.
Although overall prevalence has remained broadly stable, the scale of misuse and changing profile of substances involved continue to present challenges for courts, reinforcing the need for proportionate, evidence-based drug testing in family proceedings.
The latest ONS figures underline the continued prevalence of drug misuse across England and Wales.
For the year ending March 2025:
While these levels have not increased markedly, they have also failed to decline, indicating that drug misuse remains a persistent issue.
For family courts, this translates into a steady flow of cases where historic or ongoing drug use must be carefully assessed.
The ONS data also challenges long-standing assumptions about who is most likely to misuse drugs. While younger adults continue to report the highest levels of use, there have been increases among older age groups (eg aged 45-54).
This shift is significant for family law, where substance misuse may arise in cases involving older parents or carers.
Socio-economic trends further complicate the picture, with higher rates of Class A drug use reported among higher-income households, undermining assumptions that serious drug misuse is confined to economically deprived groups.
For legal practitioners, these findings reinforce the importance of avoiding assumptions based on age, income or lifestyle. Instead, objective, court-admissible drug testing remains essential to accurately assess risk and safeguarding concerns.
Established substances continue to dominate patterns of misuse.
However, prevalence data alone does not fully reflect the complexity encountered in family law cases. In practice, courts are increasingly dealing with misuse of controlled prescription medications, new psychoactive substances and poly-drug combinations, many of which are not routinely included in standard testing panels.
This is particularly relevant where substances are taken without full awareness of their composition, or where prescribed drugs are misused, complicating disclosure and risk assessment.
Reliance on standard testing panels alone no longer provides a sufficiently accurate picture of an individual’s substance use, particularly where non-standard drugs or poly-drug use are involved.
In family proceedings, a narrow testing scope may fail to identify habitual or problematic use outside standard panels.
Additionally, symptoms of drug use often overlap across different substances, meaning that symptoms alone cannot be used to determine which drugs to test for.
Drug misuse remains a persistent feature of life in England and Wales, with patterns of use that are broad and increasingly complex. As drug use diversifies, testing strategies must evolve accordingly.

Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps