*/
© Shutterstock
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Substance misuse continues to play a significant role in family law proceedings, influencing decisions around safeguarding, parenting capacity and contact arrangements.
The latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) data confirms that drug use remains widespread, with millions of adults reporting recent use.
Although overall prevalence has remained broadly stable, the scale of misuse and changing profile of substances involved continue to present challenges for courts, reinforcing the need for proportionate, evidence-based drug testing in family proceedings.
The latest ONS figures underline the continued prevalence of drug misuse across England and Wales.
For the year ending March 2025:
While these levels have not increased markedly, they have also failed to decline, indicating that drug misuse remains a persistent issue.
For family courts, this translates into a steady flow of cases where historic or ongoing drug use must be carefully assessed.
The ONS data also challenges long-standing assumptions about who is most likely to misuse drugs. While younger adults continue to report the highest levels of use, there have been increases among older age groups (eg aged 45-54).
This shift is significant for family law, where substance misuse may arise in cases involving older parents or carers.
Socio-economic trends further complicate the picture, with higher rates of Class A drug use reported among higher-income households, undermining assumptions that serious drug misuse is confined to economically deprived groups.
For legal practitioners, these findings reinforce the importance of avoiding assumptions based on age, income or lifestyle. Instead, objective, court-admissible drug testing remains essential to accurately assess risk and safeguarding concerns.
Established substances continue to dominate patterns of misuse.
However, prevalence data alone does not fully reflect the complexity encountered in family law cases. In practice, courts are increasingly dealing with misuse of controlled prescription medications, new psychoactive substances and poly-drug combinations, many of which are not routinely included in standard testing panels.
This is particularly relevant where substances are taken without full awareness of their composition, or where prescribed drugs are misused, complicating disclosure and risk assessment.
Reliance on standard testing panels alone no longer provides a sufficiently accurate picture of an individual’s substance use, particularly where non-standard drugs or poly-drug use are involved.
In family proceedings, a narrow testing scope may fail to identify habitual or problematic use outside standard panels.
Additionally, symptoms of drug use often overlap across different substances, meaning that symptoms alone cannot be used to determine which drugs to test for.
Drug misuse remains a persistent feature of life in England and Wales, with patterns of use that are broad and increasingly complex. As drug use diversifies, testing strategies must evolve accordingly.

Substance misuse continues to play a significant role in family law proceedings, influencing decisions around safeguarding, parenting capacity and contact arrangements.
The latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) data confirms that drug use remains widespread, with millions of adults reporting recent use.
Although overall prevalence has remained broadly stable, the scale of misuse and changing profile of substances involved continue to present challenges for courts, reinforcing the need for proportionate, evidence-based drug testing in family proceedings.
The latest ONS figures underline the continued prevalence of drug misuse across England and Wales.
For the year ending March 2025:
While these levels have not increased markedly, they have also failed to decline, indicating that drug misuse remains a persistent issue.
For family courts, this translates into a steady flow of cases where historic or ongoing drug use must be carefully assessed.
The ONS data also challenges long-standing assumptions about who is most likely to misuse drugs. While younger adults continue to report the highest levels of use, there have been increases among older age groups (eg aged 45-54).
This shift is significant for family law, where substance misuse may arise in cases involving older parents or carers.
Socio-economic trends further complicate the picture, with higher rates of Class A drug use reported among higher-income households, undermining assumptions that serious drug misuse is confined to economically deprived groups.
For legal practitioners, these findings reinforce the importance of avoiding assumptions based on age, income or lifestyle. Instead, objective, court-admissible drug testing remains essential to accurately assess risk and safeguarding concerns.
Established substances continue to dominate patterns of misuse.
However, prevalence data alone does not fully reflect the complexity encountered in family law cases. In practice, courts are increasingly dealing with misuse of controlled prescription medications, new psychoactive substances and poly-drug combinations, many of which are not routinely included in standard testing panels.
This is particularly relevant where substances are taken without full awareness of their composition, or where prescribed drugs are misused, complicating disclosure and risk assessment.
Reliance on standard testing panels alone no longer provides a sufficiently accurate picture of an individual’s substance use, particularly where non-standard drugs or poly-drug use are involved.
In family proceedings, a narrow testing scope may fail to identify habitual or problematic use outside standard panels.
Additionally, symptoms of drug use often overlap across different substances, meaning that symptoms alone cannot be used to determine which drugs to test for.
Drug misuse remains a persistent feature of life in England and Wales, with patterns of use that are broad and increasingly complex. As drug use diversifies, testing strategies must evolve accordingly.

Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
The Bar Council is ready to support a turn to the efficiencies that will make a difference
The white-collar criminal and civil silk Jonathan Fisher KC, Independent Reviewer of Disclosure and Fraud Offences, advocates modernising the disclosure regime and harnessing AI to reduce the court backlog. He tells Anthony Inglese CB about his career path and conclusions of his review