*/
© AlphaBiolabs
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Substance misuse continues to play a significant role in family law proceedings, influencing decisions around safeguarding, parenting capacity and contact arrangements.
The latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) data confirms that drug use remains widespread, with millions of adults reporting recent use.
Although overall prevalence has remained broadly stable, the scale of misuse and changing profile of substances involved continue to present challenges for courts, reinforcing the need for proportionate, evidence-based drug testing in family proceedings.
The latest ONS figures underline the continued prevalence of drug misuse across England and Wales.
For the year ending March 2025:
While these levels have not increased markedly, they have also failed to decline, indicating that drug misuse remains a persistent issue.
For family courts, this translates into a steady flow of cases where historic or ongoing drug use must be carefully assessed.
The ONS data also challenges long-standing assumptions about who is most likely to misuse drugs. While younger adults continue to report the highest levels of use, there have been increases among older age groups (eg aged 45-54).
This shift is significant for family law, where substance misuse may arise in cases involving older parents or carers.
Socio-economic trends further complicate the picture, with higher rates of Class A drug use reported among higher-income households, undermining assumptions that serious drug misuse is confined to economically deprived groups.
For legal practitioners, these findings reinforce the importance of avoiding assumptions based on age, income or lifestyle. Instead, objective, court-admissible drug testing remains essential to accurately assess risk and safeguarding concerns.
Established substances continue to dominate patterns of misuse.
However, prevalence data alone does not fully reflect the complexity encountered in family law cases. In practice, courts are increasingly dealing with misuse of controlled prescription medications, new psychoactive substances and poly-drug combinations, many of which are not routinely included in standard testing panels.
This is particularly relevant where substances are taken without full awareness of their composition, or where prescribed drugs are misused, complicating disclosure and risk assessment.
Reliance on standard testing panels alone no longer provides a sufficiently accurate picture of an individual’s substance use, particularly where non-standard drugs or poly-drug use are involved.
In family proceedings, a narrow testing scope may fail to identify habitual or problematic use outside standard panels.
Additionally, symptoms of drug use often overlap across different substances, meaning that symptoms alone cannot be used to determine which drugs to test for.
Drug misuse remains a persistent feature of life in England and Wales, with patterns of use that are broad and increasingly complex. As drug use diversifies, testing strategies must evolve accordingly.

Substance misuse continues to play a significant role in family law proceedings, influencing decisions around safeguarding, parenting capacity and contact arrangements.
The latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) data confirms that drug use remains widespread, with millions of adults reporting recent use.
Although overall prevalence has remained broadly stable, the scale of misuse and changing profile of substances involved continue to present challenges for courts, reinforcing the need for proportionate, evidence-based drug testing in family proceedings.
The latest ONS figures underline the continued prevalence of drug misuse across England and Wales.
For the year ending March 2025:
While these levels have not increased markedly, they have also failed to decline, indicating that drug misuse remains a persistent issue.
For family courts, this translates into a steady flow of cases where historic or ongoing drug use must be carefully assessed.
The ONS data also challenges long-standing assumptions about who is most likely to misuse drugs. While younger adults continue to report the highest levels of use, there have been increases among older age groups (eg aged 45-54).
This shift is significant for family law, where substance misuse may arise in cases involving older parents or carers.
Socio-economic trends further complicate the picture, with higher rates of Class A drug use reported among higher-income households, undermining assumptions that serious drug misuse is confined to economically deprived groups.
For legal practitioners, these findings reinforce the importance of avoiding assumptions based on age, income or lifestyle. Instead, objective, court-admissible drug testing remains essential to accurately assess risk and safeguarding concerns.
Established substances continue to dominate patterns of misuse.
However, prevalence data alone does not fully reflect the complexity encountered in family law cases. In practice, courts are increasingly dealing with misuse of controlled prescription medications, new psychoactive substances and poly-drug combinations, many of which are not routinely included in standard testing panels.
This is particularly relevant where substances are taken without full awareness of their composition, or where prescribed drugs are misused, complicating disclosure and risk assessment.
Reliance on standard testing panels alone no longer provides a sufficiently accurate picture of an individual’s substance use, particularly where non-standard drugs or poly-drug use are involved.
In family proceedings, a narrow testing scope may fail to identify habitual or problematic use outside standard panels.
Additionally, symptoms of drug use often overlap across different substances, meaning that symptoms alone cannot be used to determine which drugs to test for.
Drug misuse remains a persistent feature of life in England and Wales, with patterns of use that are broad and increasingly complex. As drug use diversifies, testing strategies must evolve accordingly.

Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Kirsty Brimelow KC, Chair of the Bar, sets our course for 2026
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
Ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC continues his series explaining the impact on barristers. In part 2, a worked example shows the specific practicalities of adapting to the new system
Resolution of the criminal justice crisis does not lie in reheating old ideas that have been roundly rejected before, say Ed Vickers KC, Faras Baloch and Katie Bacon
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts