*/
Drug misuse remains a recurrent feature in family proceedings, often shaping decisions around safeguarding, supervision and contact.
However, the substance abuse landscape is no longer confined to heroin, cocaine, and cannabis. Toxicology laboratories are seeing an increase in controlled prescription drug misuse, the continued emergence of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS), and a marked rise in poly-drug use.
In addition, street drugs are increasingly adulterated or contaminated, meaning individuals may be unaware of the full range of substances they have consumed, many of which fall outside standard drug testing panels and may not be detected unless specifically requested.
For legal practitioners, it is no longer enough to know whether someone has taken a drug. Understanding what that drug is, how it is classified, and how it is typically used is equally important.
In family cases, how a substance is classified under UK law can have a real bearing on how risk is assessed and how evidence is framed.
Importantly, legal status does not necessarily reflect safeguarding risk. A substance may be lawfully prescribed, yet misused in a manner that impairs cognition, behaviour, or parenting capacity.
While traditional illicit drugs remain relevant, family practitioners are increasingly encountering a broader spectrum of substances in legally-instructed testing:
We are also seeing increasing misuse of prescription-only medications including anticonvulsants like gabapentin and pregabalin, antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anabolic steroids. These substances may be lawfully prescribed, yet excessive or non-prescribed use can contribute to mood instability, cognitive impairment, or behavioural volatility.
Understanding the main drug groups can help shape the scope of testing instructed and avoid gaps in the evidential picture.
Standard drug panels are designed to detect the most misused controlled substances. However, where prescription drug misuse, synthetic cannabinoids, or emerging psychoactive substances are suspected, an extended panel may be required.
Results must also be interpreted within clinical and behavioural context. The presence of a prescribed medication does not automatically indicate misuse; conversely, lawful access does not negate safeguarding concerns.
In response to demand for our previous guide, Drug & Alcohol Testing: a summary of testing options, we have developed a complementary guide for family law professionals: The main drug groups in the UK: legislation, medical applications and symptoms of misuse.
The guide provides:

Drug misuse remains a recurrent feature in family proceedings, often shaping decisions around safeguarding, supervision and contact.
However, the substance abuse landscape is no longer confined to heroin, cocaine, and cannabis. Toxicology laboratories are seeing an increase in controlled prescription drug misuse, the continued emergence of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS), and a marked rise in poly-drug use.
In addition, street drugs are increasingly adulterated or contaminated, meaning individuals may be unaware of the full range of substances they have consumed, many of which fall outside standard drug testing panels and may not be detected unless specifically requested.
For legal practitioners, it is no longer enough to know whether someone has taken a drug. Understanding what that drug is, how it is classified, and how it is typically used is equally important.
In family cases, how a substance is classified under UK law can have a real bearing on how risk is assessed and how evidence is framed.
Importantly, legal status does not necessarily reflect safeguarding risk. A substance may be lawfully prescribed, yet misused in a manner that impairs cognition, behaviour, or parenting capacity.
While traditional illicit drugs remain relevant, family practitioners are increasingly encountering a broader spectrum of substances in legally-instructed testing:
We are also seeing increasing misuse of prescription-only medications including anticonvulsants like gabapentin and pregabalin, antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anabolic steroids. These substances may be lawfully prescribed, yet excessive or non-prescribed use can contribute to mood instability, cognitive impairment, or behavioural volatility.
Understanding the main drug groups can help shape the scope of testing instructed and avoid gaps in the evidential picture.
Standard drug panels are designed to detect the most misused controlled substances. However, where prescription drug misuse, synthetic cannabinoids, or emerging psychoactive substances are suspected, an extended panel may be required.
Results must also be interpreted within clinical and behavioural context. The presence of a prescribed medication does not automatically indicate misuse; conversely, lawful access does not negate safeguarding concerns.
In response to demand for our previous guide, Drug & Alcohol Testing: a summary of testing options, we have developed a complementary guide for family law professionals: The main drug groups in the UK: legislation, medical applications and symptoms of misuse.
The guide provides:

Chair of the Bar reports back
Get ready to lead in a rapidly evolving digital landscape
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Valerie Sterling, Head of the Family Team at New Park Court Chambers, offers reflections from a distinguished 40-year career in law
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will