*/
Profession
Adjustments to the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) have been announced, following vigorous debate on the fourth consultation on the scheme.
The Joint Advocacy Group (JAG) – comprising representatives of the Bar Standards Board, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards – has confirmed that whilst the core components of the scheme have not changed, some technical adjustments will be made.
Two competent pieces of judicial evaluation (JE) will be required for registration and the period of time for collecting them will be extended from 12 months to two years. The JEs would need to be obtained in successive effective trials over the two-year period. A ‘level 2 advocate’ assessed as competent by an assessment centre would similarly require two JEs over two years, should they wish to undertake level 2 trial work.
QCs appointed from 2010 will be “passported” into the scheme for up to five years from the date they were awarded silk. Those appointed before 2010 would register in the scheme as QCs and be assessed against the standards and criteria for their chosen level through two JEs over two years. There will be a separate QC label under the scheme eg “4QC” in order to differentiate QCs from other level 4 advocates.
JAG has said that discussions should begin immediately with Queen’s Counsel Appointments on how to “align or integrate the quality assurance and re-accreditation of QCs in the future”.
Further consideration will also be given to the categorisation of the level of the case and the role of the judiciary in assigning levels to a case; ensuring that each regulator’s rules achieve consistency of outcome to support the single scheme; the definition of criminal advocacy and application to specialist practitioners; the submission of evaluation forms directly to the regulator by judge; and consistency of the approach to dealing with appeals against decisions taken by the regulators under the scheme.
A further announcement about the details of the scheme was expected at the end of January. However, the core elements of judicial evaluation, periodic re-evaluation and phased geographical implementation will remain in place.
The Joint Advocacy Group (JAG) – comprising representatives of the Bar Standards Board, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards – has confirmed that whilst the core components of the scheme have not changed, some technical adjustments will be made.
Two competent pieces of judicial evaluation (JE) will be required for registration and the period of time for collecting them will be extended from 12 months to two years. The JEs would need to be obtained in successive effective trials over the two-year period. A ‘level 2 advocate’ assessed as competent by an assessment centre would similarly require two JEs over two years, should they wish to undertake level 2 trial work.
QCs appointed from 2010 will be “passported” into the scheme for up to five years from the date they were awarded silk. Those appointed before 2010 would register in the scheme as QCs and be assessed against the standards and criteria for their chosen level through two JEs over two years. There will be a separate QC label under the scheme eg “4QC” in order to differentiate QCs from other level 4 advocates.
JAG has said that discussions should begin immediately with Queen’s Counsel Appointments on how to “align or integrate the quality assurance and re-accreditation of QCs in the future”.
Further consideration will also be given to the categorisation of the level of the case and the role of the judiciary in assigning levels to a case; ensuring that each regulator’s rules achieve consistency of outcome to support the single scheme; the definition of criminal advocacy and application to specialist practitioners; the submission of evaluation forms directly to the regulator by judge; and consistency of the approach to dealing with appeals against decisions taken by the regulators under the scheme.
A further announcement about the details of the scheme was expected at the end of January. However, the core elements of judicial evaluation, periodic re-evaluation and phased geographical implementation will remain in place.
Profession
Adjustments to the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) have been announced, following vigorous debate on the fourth consultation on the scheme.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt