*/
Professional update
The new Code of Practice for Victims of Crime has been published by the Ministry of Justice. It is divided into three main sections: enhanced entitlements for victims of the most serious crimes; persistently targeted victims and vulnerable or intimidated witnesses; entitlements for adult victims and corresponding duties on service providers; and entitlements for children and young people and corresponding duties on service providers.
Amongst the key entitlements are being kept informed, including being kept informed about the stages of the process from the arrest of the suspect, to have special measures explained to them and where circumstances permit to meet the prosecutor and to ask him or her questions about the court process. There are further sections about victim personal statements, restorative justice and applying for compensation. In terms of investigation, paragraphs 1.5 and 1.6 set out in detail what the police must do when interviewing a victim and which in turn should be preceded by a “needs assessment” of what support the witness needs. All this now has the same status as the PACE codes and a court can take them into account if they are breached.
In addition, paragraph 3.3 obliges the prosecutor to seek the court’s intervention when cross-examination is considered by the prosecutor to be inappropriate or too aggressive.
The new Victims’ Code should be read in conjunction with the Criminal Practice Directions issued by the Lord Chief Justice in October (which makes even more specific rules about the allowable means of cross-examining a vulnerable witness and the need to follow the Advocate’s Gateway Toolkits), and the newly issued Equal Treatment Bench Book from the Judicial College, which goes further in recommending flexibility in the court’s approach in adapting the process in order to allow vulnerable witnesses to give their best evidence. All this dispels the misconception that arose following the Brewer trial earlier this year: it is in fact good practice that a vulnerable witness who has refused special measures is still to be treated as a vulnerable witness.
Amongst the key entitlements are being kept informed, including being kept informed about the stages of the process from the arrest of the suspect, to have special measures explained to them and where circumstances permit to meet the prosecutor and to ask him or her questions about the court process. There are further sections about victim personal statements, restorative justice and applying for compensation. In terms of investigation, paragraphs 1.5 and 1.6 set out in detail what the police must do when interviewing a victim and which in turn should be preceded by a “needs assessment” of what support the witness needs. All this now has the same status as the PACE codes and a court can take them into account if they are breached.
In addition, paragraph 3.3 obliges the prosecutor to seek the court’s intervention when cross-examination is considered by the prosecutor to be inappropriate or too aggressive.
The new Victims’ Code should be read in conjunction with the Criminal Practice Directions issued by the Lord Chief Justice in October (which makes even more specific rules about the allowable means of cross-examining a vulnerable witness and the need to follow the Advocate’s Gateway Toolkits), and the newly issued Equal Treatment Bench Book from the Judicial College, which goes further in recommending flexibility in the court’s approach in adapting the process in order to allow vulnerable witnesses to give their best evidence. All this dispels the misconception that arose following the Brewer trial earlier this year: it is in fact good practice that a vulnerable witness who has refused special measures is still to be treated as a vulnerable witness.
Professional update
The new Code of Practice for Victims of Crime has been published by the Ministry of Justice. It is divided into three main sections: enhanced entitlements for victims of the most serious crimes; persistently targeted victims and vulnerable or intimidated witnesses; entitlements for adult victims and corresponding duties on service providers; and entitlements for children and young people and corresponding duties on service providers.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
