*/
By Adam Tomkins
Reviewed by Dr Bysshe Inigo Coffey
On the Law of Speaking Freely is an urgent and intelligent book. Adam Tomkins is right to use the present participle in the title. After all, ‘free speech’ should be a living phrase and bring to mind those two dear Johns (Milton and Mill). Quotations should bubble up readily: something about the ‘precious lifeblood of a master spirit’, or history teeming ‘with instances of truth put down by persecution’. But today ‘free speech’ drags behind it a ghoulish and clanking parade of culture war noise. Yet Tomkins manages to shake it off and in doing so says more about that clamour than a volume like The Free Speech Wars (Manchester University Press, 2020) ever could. He returns to what it means to think, speak, and write freely, and why it matters.
To do so he has to go back. The book has two parts – then and now – and it accomplishes a great deal for its size. Tomkins begins with the story of the ages of heresy, sedition and offence. But ‘none of these ages is over: even now we still live in them’. We move through the English context of the Civil War, Reformation, Counter-Reformation, and what he considers to be the ‘first stirrings of free speech’ with Milton and the Levellers. He has a gift for assimilation, and he is at ease with disparate material. In other hands one might feel hurried or as if sat in a crammer.
If the book is historically succinct and sharp, it is also happily literary. The discussion of Cato’s Letters is confidently handled, and he is excellent on Swift and Johnson’s sceptical turn (I note that David Womersley is thanked). It is then that Tomkins turns to Mill before addressing America, and the First Amendment that ‘most iconic, legal commitment to free speech’. It is a book from which to learn about the now and then, and it is also a book for the here and there. The reader need not worry about anglocentrism.
In the now section, Tomkins discusses media freedom, offensive and hate speech, and online safety. In so few words it is difficult to do justice to such a book on the law of speaking freely. So let me be coercive: read it.
Bloomsbury: May 2025 Paperback 280 pages ISBN 9781509972104
.jpeg?sfvrsn=368e95b1_2)
Dr Bysshe Inigo Coffey is a tutor at St Anne’s College and English Departmental Lecturer, University of Oxford. He is a former British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow and Early Career Fellow at Balliol College, Oxford. He is the author of Shelley’s Broken World (Liverpool University Press: 2023). He is an Inner Temple GDL Scholar, and he is currently researching the relationship between literary and legal interpretation.
On the Law of Speaking Freely is an urgent and intelligent book. Adam Tomkins is right to use the present participle in the title. After all, ‘free speech’ should be a living phrase and bring to mind those two dear Johns (Milton and Mill). Quotations should bubble up readily: something about the ‘precious lifeblood of a master spirit’, or history teeming ‘with instances of truth put down by persecution’. But today ‘free speech’ drags behind it a ghoulish and clanking parade of culture war noise. Yet Tomkins manages to shake it off and in doing so says more about that clamour than a volume like The Free Speech Wars (Manchester University Press, 2020) ever could. He returns to what it means to think, speak, and write freely, and why it matters.
To do so he has to go back. The book has two parts – then and now – and it accomplishes a great deal for its size. Tomkins begins with the story of the ages of heresy, sedition and offence. But ‘none of these ages is over: even now we still live in them’. We move through the English context of the Civil War, Reformation, Counter-Reformation, and what he considers to be the ‘first stirrings of free speech’ with Milton and the Levellers. He has a gift for assimilation, and he is at ease with disparate material. In other hands one might feel hurried or as if sat in a crammer.
If the book is historically succinct and sharp, it is also happily literary. The discussion of Cato’s Letters is confidently handled, and he is excellent on Swift and Johnson’s sceptical turn (I note that David Womersley is thanked). It is then that Tomkins turns to Mill before addressing America, and the First Amendment that ‘most iconic, legal commitment to free speech’. It is a book from which to learn about the now and then, and it is also a book for the here and there. The reader need not worry about anglocentrism.
In the now section, Tomkins discusses media freedom, offensive and hate speech, and online safety. In so few words it is difficult to do justice to such a book on the law of speaking freely. So let me be coercive: read it.
Bloomsbury: May 2025 Paperback 280 pages ISBN 9781509972104
By Adam Tomkins
Reviewed by Dr Bysshe Inigo Coffey
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Get ready to lead in a rapidly evolving digital landscape
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will
