*/
Crime
A new impetus is required to identify and tackle disability hate crime, according to a new Criminal Justice Joint Inspectorate report.
Police fail fully to consider disability hate crime issues in day-to-day investigative work; the CPS needs to improve case preparation to ensure effective prosecution; courts are not being reminded of their powers of sentencing; and the probation trusts are not being given good enough information in preparing pre-sentence reports, the
report concluded.
There were 1,744 disability hate crimes reported by the police in 2011-12, despite approximately 21% of the population being disabled. Figures are low, said the report, because the criminal justice system was unable “to combat prevalent social attitudes and to deal effectively with cases that can have inherent complexities”. The issue of under-reporting could be ameliorated by the use of intermediaries, the Inspectorate recommended.
There is no separate disability hate crime offence, but s 146 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 makes it an aggravating factor in sentencing if the defendant demonstrates, or is motivated by, hostility towards a victim who has a disability. One of the report’s main recommendations is that the police, CPS and probation trusts should adopt a single, clear definition of disability hate crime that is communicated effectively to the public and staff. Advocates should refer to s 146 as part of the sentencing process, where appropriate.
Despite a CPS flagging system for disability hate crime, of the files inspected for this report, 19.1% were flagged incorrectly; and of those that were correctly flagged, 47.5% were thought to have no prospect of the facts satisfying the s 146 definition. In addition, although CPS policy requires that a victim be offered a meeting with the prosecutor when an application is made for special measures, in order to build trust and confidence, there was no evidence in any of the files examined that offers were being made for meetings. Over a third of lawyers who answered the inspection team’s survey confirmed that they had not received any training in relation to disability hate crime and less than 20% described their knowledge levels of special measures as “very thorough”.
The report was published on 21 March and can be seen in full at www.hmcpsi.gov.uk/cjji/
Police fail fully to consider disability hate crime issues in day-to-day investigative work; the CPS needs to improve case preparation to ensure effective prosecution; courts are not being reminded of their powers of sentencing; and the probation trusts are not being given good enough information in preparing pre-sentence reports, the
report concluded.
There were 1,744 disability hate crimes reported by the police in 2011-12, despite approximately 21% of the population being disabled. Figures are low, said the report, because the criminal justice system was unable “to combat prevalent social attitudes and to deal effectively with cases that can have inherent complexities”. The issue of under-reporting could be ameliorated by the use of intermediaries, the Inspectorate recommended.
There is no separate disability hate crime offence, but s 146 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 makes it an aggravating factor in sentencing if the defendant demonstrates, or is motivated by, hostility towards a victim who has a disability. One of the report’s main recommendations is that the police, CPS and probation trusts should adopt a single, clear definition of disability hate crime that is communicated effectively to the public and staff. Advocates should refer to s 146 as part of the sentencing process, where appropriate.
Despite a CPS flagging system for disability hate crime, of the files inspected for this report, 19.1% were flagged incorrectly; and of those that were correctly flagged, 47.5% were thought to have no prospect of the facts satisfying the s 146 definition. In addition, although CPS policy requires that a victim be offered a meeting with the prosecutor when an application is made for special measures, in order to build trust and confidence, there was no evidence in any of the files examined that offers were being made for meetings. Over a third of lawyers who answered the inspection team’s survey confirmed that they had not received any training in relation to disability hate crime and less than 20% described their knowledge levels of special measures as “very thorough”.
The report was published on 21 March and can be seen in full at www.hmcpsi.gov.uk/cjji/
Crime
A new impetus is required to identify and tackle disability hate crime, according to a new Criminal Justice Joint Inspectorate report.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt