*/
Crime
A new impetus is required to identify and tackle disability hate crime, according to a new Criminal Justice Joint Inspectorate report.
Police fail fully to consider disability hate crime issues in day-to-day investigative work; the CPS needs to improve case preparation to ensure effective prosecution; courts are not being reminded of their powers of sentencing; and the probation trusts are not being given good enough information in preparing pre-sentence reports, the
report concluded.
There were 1,744 disability hate crimes reported by the police in 2011-12, despite approximately 21% of the population being disabled. Figures are low, said the report, because the criminal justice system was unable “to combat prevalent social attitudes and to deal effectively with cases that can have inherent complexities”. The issue of under-reporting could be ameliorated by the use of intermediaries, the Inspectorate recommended.
There is no separate disability hate crime offence, but s 146 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 makes it an aggravating factor in sentencing if the defendant demonstrates, or is motivated by, hostility towards a victim who has a disability. One of the report’s main recommendations is that the police, CPS and probation trusts should adopt a single, clear definition of disability hate crime that is communicated effectively to the public and staff. Advocates should refer to s 146 as part of the sentencing process, where appropriate.
Despite a CPS flagging system for disability hate crime, of the files inspected for this report, 19.1% were flagged incorrectly; and of those that were correctly flagged, 47.5% were thought to have no prospect of the facts satisfying the s 146 definition. In addition, although CPS policy requires that a victim be offered a meeting with the prosecutor when an application is made for special measures, in order to build trust and confidence, there was no evidence in any of the files examined that offers were being made for meetings. Over a third of lawyers who answered the inspection team’s survey confirmed that they had not received any training in relation to disability hate crime and less than 20% described their knowledge levels of special measures as “very thorough”.
The report was published on 21 March and can be seen in full at www.hmcpsi.gov.uk/cjji/
Police fail fully to consider disability hate crime issues in day-to-day investigative work; the CPS needs to improve case preparation to ensure effective prosecution; courts are not being reminded of their powers of sentencing; and the probation trusts are not being given good enough information in preparing pre-sentence reports, the
report concluded.
There were 1,744 disability hate crimes reported by the police in 2011-12, despite approximately 21% of the population being disabled. Figures are low, said the report, because the criminal justice system was unable “to combat prevalent social attitudes and to deal effectively with cases that can have inherent complexities”. The issue of under-reporting could be ameliorated by the use of intermediaries, the Inspectorate recommended.
There is no separate disability hate crime offence, but s 146 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 makes it an aggravating factor in sentencing if the defendant demonstrates, or is motivated by, hostility towards a victim who has a disability. One of the report’s main recommendations is that the police, CPS and probation trusts should adopt a single, clear definition of disability hate crime that is communicated effectively to the public and staff. Advocates should refer to s 146 as part of the sentencing process, where appropriate.
Despite a CPS flagging system for disability hate crime, of the files inspected for this report, 19.1% were flagged incorrectly; and of those that were correctly flagged, 47.5% were thought to have no prospect of the facts satisfying the s 146 definition. In addition, although CPS policy requires that a victim be offered a meeting with the prosecutor when an application is made for special measures, in order to build trust and confidence, there was no evidence in any of the files examined that offers were being made for meetings. Over a third of lawyers who answered the inspection team’s survey confirmed that they had not received any training in relation to disability hate crime and less than 20% described their knowledge levels of special measures as “very thorough”.
The report was published on 21 March and can be seen in full at www.hmcpsi.gov.uk/cjji/
Crime
A new impetus is required to identify and tackle disability hate crime, according to a new Criminal Justice Joint Inspectorate report.
Countering the gatekeeper agenda, troubling news on earnings disparities, spreading best practice in chambers, Pro Bono Week 2023, and the Rules of War
By David Cosway (with the help of ChatGPT)
Due to advances in research, technology and techniques, AlphaBiolabs can now offer alcohol testing for head hair samples that are just 1cm in length
With the explosion of interest in governance and the growing need to be multi-skilled to keep career options open, adding an extra string to your bow is not without its merits. The Chartered Governance Institute UK & Ireland (CGIUKI) Fast Track for the Chartered Governance Qualifying Programme could be ideal for experienced professionals to reach chartered governance status
The 2023-24 COMBAR mentoring scheme for underrepresented groups is now open for applications - deadline extended to 12 October 2023
The Hodge Professional Mortgage proves more popular with women
The North Eastern Circuit Leader on his trailblazing career, turbulent early years of practice and his mission to equip all barristers, regardless of their characteristics, with the opportunity to thrive. Interview by Glenn Parsons
From a CPS pupillage to Director of Legal Services at one of the largest prosecutors in England and Wales Michael Jennings describes the interesting and varied life an employed barrister in public service can lead
In 2022 Behind the Gown asked the Bar Standards Board to acknowledge online misogyny and sexism. One year on, the regulator’s revised Social Media Guidance doesn’t go far enough in confronting this issue, say Stephanie Hayward and Charlotte Proudman
Growing your junior practice via international conference and how to fund the trip: Daria Gleyze, Emile Simpson and Sajid Suleman share what they gained from the ChBA BVI Conference
Countering the gatekeeper agenda, troubling news on earnings disparities, spreading best practice in chambers, Pro Bono Week 2023, and the Rules of War