*/
Legal aid
Lord Neuberger has spoken out on the impact of cuts to legal aid in civil cases, which come into effect on 1 April.
The Supreme Court President took the unusual step of embarking on a series of media interviews last month. He spoke widely of the threat to the rule of law, arising from denying legal aid to over half a million people: “[P]eople will feel like the Government isn’t giving them access to justice in all sorts of cases,” he told the BBC. “And that will either lead to frustration and lack of confidence in the system, or it will lead to people taking the law into their own hands.”
Lord Neuberger added that the increase in litigants in person would lead to longer court hearings, with greater burdens on court staff and judges: “And you may find the savings the Government thinks it’s making in legal aid will be offset in other costs of courts and judges and court staff in supporting litigants in person,” a point also forcefully made by the Lord Chief Justice in his final annual evidence to the House of Lords Constitution Committee in February.
Under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, the Government has removed funding from private family cases (apart from those involving domestic violence, forced marriage or child abduction); clinical negligence and personal injury; employment and education; as well as social welfare law, including benefits, housing, education and debt.
The Ministry of Justice, meanwhile, has thrown a lifelife to the Citizens Advice Bureau at the Royal Courts of Justice, which faced closure after Community Legal Service grants were cut. The Ministry will be providing £90,000 to support its family justice work from 1 April.
The Supreme Court President took the unusual step of embarking on a series of media interviews last month. He spoke widely of the threat to the rule of law, arising from denying legal aid to over half a million people: “[P]eople will feel like the Government isn’t giving them access to justice in all sorts of cases,” he told the BBC. “And that will either lead to frustration and lack of confidence in the system, or it will lead to people taking the law into their own hands.”
Lord Neuberger added that the increase in litigants in person would lead to longer court hearings, with greater burdens on court staff and judges: “And you may find the savings the Government thinks it’s making in legal aid will be offset in other costs of courts and judges and court staff in supporting litigants in person,” a point also forcefully made by the Lord Chief Justice in his final annual evidence to the House of Lords Constitution Committee in February.
Under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, the Government has removed funding from private family cases (apart from those involving domestic violence, forced marriage or child abduction); clinical negligence and personal injury; employment and education; as well as social welfare law, including benefits, housing, education and debt.
The Ministry of Justice, meanwhile, has thrown a lifelife to the Citizens Advice Bureau at the Royal Courts of Justice, which faced closure after Community Legal Service grants were cut. The Ministry will be providing £90,000 to support its family justice work from 1 April.
Legal aid
Lord Neuberger has spoken out on the impact of cuts to legal aid in civil cases, which come into effect on 1 April.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
