*/
Legal aid
Lord Neuberger has spoken out on the impact of cuts to legal aid in civil cases, which come into effect on 1 April.
The Supreme Court President took the unusual step of embarking on a series of media interviews last month. He spoke widely of the threat to the rule of law, arising from denying legal aid to over half a million people: “[P]eople will feel like the Government isn’t giving them access to justice in all sorts of cases,” he told the BBC. “And that will either lead to frustration and lack of confidence in the system, or it will lead to people taking the law into their own hands.”
Lord Neuberger added that the increase in litigants in person would lead to longer court hearings, with greater burdens on court staff and judges: “And you may find the savings the Government thinks it’s making in legal aid will be offset in other costs of courts and judges and court staff in supporting litigants in person,” a point also forcefully made by the Lord Chief Justice in his final annual evidence to the House of Lords Constitution Committee in February.
Under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, the Government has removed funding from private family cases (apart from those involving domestic violence, forced marriage or child abduction); clinical negligence and personal injury; employment and education; as well as social welfare law, including benefits, housing, education and debt.
The Ministry of Justice, meanwhile, has thrown a lifelife to the Citizens Advice Bureau at the Royal Courts of Justice, which faced closure after Community Legal Service grants were cut. The Ministry will be providing £90,000 to support its family justice work from 1 April.
The Supreme Court President took the unusual step of embarking on a series of media interviews last month. He spoke widely of the threat to the rule of law, arising from denying legal aid to over half a million people: “[P]eople will feel like the Government isn’t giving them access to justice in all sorts of cases,” he told the BBC. “And that will either lead to frustration and lack of confidence in the system, or it will lead to people taking the law into their own hands.”
Lord Neuberger added that the increase in litigants in person would lead to longer court hearings, with greater burdens on court staff and judges: “And you may find the savings the Government thinks it’s making in legal aid will be offset in other costs of courts and judges and court staff in supporting litigants in person,” a point also forcefully made by the Lord Chief Justice in his final annual evidence to the House of Lords Constitution Committee in February.
Under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, the Government has removed funding from private family cases (apart from those involving domestic violence, forced marriage or child abduction); clinical negligence and personal injury; employment and education; as well as social welfare law, including benefits, housing, education and debt.
The Ministry of Justice, meanwhile, has thrown a lifelife to the Citizens Advice Bureau at the Royal Courts of Justice, which faced closure after Community Legal Service grants were cut. The Ministry will be providing £90,000 to support its family justice work from 1 April.
Legal aid
Lord Neuberger has spoken out on the impact of cuts to legal aid in civil cases, which come into effect on 1 April.
Signs of real change – more work to be done
Philip N Bristow explains how to unlock your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step
With the property market witnessing significant changes since the beginning of the pandemic, Fleet Street Wealth’s Managing Director Julian Morgan considers the future of the home, the second home and the office
In partnership with the Bar Council, LexisNexis is offering up to 60% off its extensive webinar offering.
Chambers is expanding its team.
Making a move from the Bar to a career in governance: Maria Brookes outlines three good reasons to switch and how to do it
The family law system is in crisis and a failure to recognise it as such demeans the Herculean efforts of all involved, writes Celestine Greenwood, an exhausted family practitioner
Time to look afresh at the imposter syndrome narrative? Why pathologizing normal anxieties can be unhelpful to barristers and future generations. By Kate Brunner QC and Sarah Regan
Cultural change is actually just a numbers game joining the dots and wearing the pin.Chris Gutteridge's lessons learnt...
The pandemic and widespread introduction of remote hearings has been an interesting start to a career at the Bar: Lola-Rose Avery shares a day in her life
Shifting the taboo, two silks talk about the menopause, its impact on women at the Bar and the need for a profession-wide rethink. By Lyndsey de Mestre QC and Brie Stevens-Hoare QC
