*/
Profession
More practitioners than ever before are considering a judicial career, according to research on barriers to judicial appointment.
A survey completed by over 4,000 solicitors, barristers and chartered legal executive eligible for appointment found that 46% had considered applying for office, a significant increase since previous research in 2008 (32%). Forty-three per cent saw being a judge as part of their career path (up from 28%); and 73% thought they had the right skills and experience.
But the survey results, published at the end of August, also indicated that aspirations are not being translated into applications, particularly amongst black and minority ethnic (BAME) and female lawyers. Fifty one per cent (up from 50%) did not think they would be appointed; 41% (up from 33%) felt they were too young; and 37% (dropped from 51%) were happy in their current jobs.
Other factors discouraging applications were found to be the isolated nature of the judicial role (59%, down from 66%); the judicial culture, which did not appeal to 40% (down from 50%); and the amount of travel – 43% (down from 53%). Educational and professional background were seen as strong influences on success, as were networking and contacts.
Prejudice in the selection process was felt by 56% of BAME and 59% of disabled lawyers (compared to white 45%, non-disabled 46%). Sixty eight per cent of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lawyers (LGBT) said they would be more likely to apply if there were more openly LGBT members of the judiciary.
The potential applicants wanted more information about the selection process, judicial roles and entry requirements; more flexible working and work shadowing/mentoring schemes; greater employer support; and earlier notice of when vacancies will be advertised. More training after appointment, less reliance on references for shortlisting and more diverse role models were also cited as beneficial steps.
The Bar Council, which co-funded the research, said it would address “the concerns of some areas of the Bar” via better information on the website and its outreach programme.
But the survey results, published at the end of August, also indicated that aspirations are not being translated into applications, particularly amongst black and minority ethnic (BAME) and female lawyers. Fifty one per cent (up from 50%) did not think they would be appointed; 41% (up from 33%) felt they were too young; and 37% (dropped from 51%) were happy in their current jobs.
Other factors discouraging applications were found to be the isolated nature of the judicial role (59%, down from 66%); the judicial culture, which did not appeal to 40% (down from 50%); and the amount of travel – 43% (down from 53%). Educational and professional background were seen as strong influences on success, as were networking and contacts.
Prejudice in the selection process was felt by 56% of BAME and 59% of disabled lawyers (compared to white 45%, non-disabled 46%). Sixty eight per cent of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lawyers (LGBT) said they would be more likely to apply if there were more openly LGBT members of the judiciary.
The potential applicants wanted more information about the selection process, judicial roles and entry requirements; more flexible working and work shadowing/mentoring schemes; greater employer support; and earlier notice of when vacancies will be advertised. More training after appointment, less reliance on references for shortlisting and more diverse role models were also cited as beneficial steps.
The Bar Council, which co-funded the research, said it would address “the concerns of some areas of the Bar” via better information on the website and its outreach programme.
Profession
More practitioners than ever before are considering a judicial career, according to research on barriers to judicial appointment.
A survey completed by over 4,000 solicitors, barristers and chartered legal executive eligible for appointment found that 46% had considered applying for office, a significant increase since previous research in 2008 (32%). Forty-three per cent saw being a judge as part of their career path (up from 28%); and 73% thought they had the right skills and experience.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
