*/
Profession
More practitioners than ever before are considering a judicial career, according to research on barriers to judicial appointment.
A survey completed by over 4,000 solicitors, barristers and chartered legal executive eligible for appointment found that 46% had considered applying for office, a significant increase since previous research in 2008 (32%). Forty-three per cent saw being a judge as part of their career path (up from 28%); and 73% thought they had the right skills and experience.
But the survey results, published at the end of August, also indicated that aspirations are not being translated into applications, particularly amongst black and minority ethnic (BAME) and female lawyers. Fifty one per cent (up from 50%) did not think they would be appointed; 41% (up from 33%) felt they were too young; and 37% (dropped from 51%) were happy in their current jobs.
Other factors discouraging applications were found to be the isolated nature of the judicial role (59%, down from 66%); the judicial culture, which did not appeal to 40% (down from 50%); and the amount of travel – 43% (down from 53%). Educational and professional background were seen as strong influences on success, as were networking and contacts.
Prejudice in the selection process was felt by 56% of BAME and 59% of disabled lawyers (compared to white 45%, non-disabled 46%). Sixty eight per cent of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lawyers (LGBT) said they would be more likely to apply if there were more openly LGBT members of the judiciary.
The potential applicants wanted more information about the selection process, judicial roles and entry requirements; more flexible working and work shadowing/mentoring schemes; greater employer support; and earlier notice of when vacancies will be advertised. More training after appointment, less reliance on references for shortlisting and more diverse role models were also cited as beneficial steps.
The Bar Council, which co-funded the research, said it would address “the concerns of some areas of the Bar” via better information on the website and its outreach programme.
But the survey results, published at the end of August, also indicated that aspirations are not being translated into applications, particularly amongst black and minority ethnic (BAME) and female lawyers. Fifty one per cent (up from 50%) did not think they would be appointed; 41% (up from 33%) felt they were too young; and 37% (dropped from 51%) were happy in their current jobs.
Other factors discouraging applications were found to be the isolated nature of the judicial role (59%, down from 66%); the judicial culture, which did not appeal to 40% (down from 50%); and the amount of travel – 43% (down from 53%). Educational and professional background were seen as strong influences on success, as were networking and contacts.
Prejudice in the selection process was felt by 56% of BAME and 59% of disabled lawyers (compared to white 45%, non-disabled 46%). Sixty eight per cent of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lawyers (LGBT) said they would be more likely to apply if there were more openly LGBT members of the judiciary.
The potential applicants wanted more information about the selection process, judicial roles and entry requirements; more flexible working and work shadowing/mentoring schemes; greater employer support; and earlier notice of when vacancies will be advertised. More training after appointment, less reliance on references for shortlisting and more diverse role models were also cited as beneficial steps.
The Bar Council, which co-funded the research, said it would address “the concerns of some areas of the Bar” via better information on the website and its outreach programme.
Profession
More practitioners than ever before are considering a judicial career, according to research on barriers to judicial appointment.
A survey completed by over 4,000 solicitors, barristers and chartered legal executive eligible for appointment found that 46% had considered applying for office, a significant increase since previous research in 2008 (32%). Forty-three per cent saw being a judge as part of their career path (up from 28%); and 73% thought they had the right skills and experience.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
