*/
Review by Daniel Barnett

Into the Woods at the Bridge Theatre is a thoughtful revival of Stephen Sondheim and James Lapine’s 1986 musical, which was turned into a film with an all-star cast Meryl Streep, James Corden and Johnny Depp in 2014.
The story opens with a baker and his wife, desperate for a child, who are striving to overturn a witch’s curse that has left them childless. To do so, they need to go into the woods and find four ingredients: a red cape (Red Ridinghood – not a typo – that’s how it’s spelled in the score), a milky-white cow (Jack), golden hair (Rapunzel) and a glass slipper (I know you know that one). Each of the respective fairytale characters has their own individual quest somewhere in the woods, all of which overlap and collide in the first half until the characters come together to defeat Jack’s giant in the second half. Early ensemble numbers are brisk and clear, which helps you learn who the characters are and what slightly surreal subplots they each follow.
The cast features Jamie Parker as the Baker and Katie Brayben as the Baker’s Wife, Kate Fleetwood as the Witch, Chumisa Dornford-May as Cinderella, Bella Brown as Rapunzel, Jo Foster as Jack, Michael Gould as the Narrator, and strong support from Geoffrey Aymer, Jennifer Hepburn, Hana Ichijo and Julie Jupp. The Bridge Theatre’s space is used to pull you into the story, so characters enter and exit from all sides and scenes shift fluidly around you.
Jamie Parker (the original Harry Potter in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, the original Benjamin Button in… well, you get the point) is one of my favourite male musical theatre actors. His Baker begins as practical and cautious, voice and stance tight with worry, and grows into someone more pessimistic and accountable as the pressure rises and the deaths mount. Fleetwood’s Witch is magnetic without grandiosity. She blends bitterness and craving for control in a way that makes her more compelling than typical pantomime witches (this is very far from a panto, by the way; the show is grim and dark with a few comical moments). But her key solo, ‘Children Will Listen’, felt a little anticlimactic because the audience was anticipating it during the whole show; then there’s a bit of a ‘Oh, was that it?’ moment.
Sondheim’s lyrics and Lapine’s book are sharp, as you would expect. The text’s playfulness in the first half gives way to a harder edge in the second. A familiar refrain about being careful what you wish for is woven through the evening, and the ending is not a happy one.
I have to give a shout-out to the lighting, which slices the woods into shadows and beams that hint at unseen threats. It’s really impressive. Sound design keeps Sondheim’s notoriously tricky lyrics clear so you do not miss the clever turns of phrase that carry the show.
This show is technically brilliant and beautifully performed. And it’s so clever, with a fast-moving plot and an outstanding ability to keep the audience on the edge of their seat for the next twist. Personally, I go to most Sondheim’s with high expectations and always leave feeling a little cheated. You can appreciate the brilliance of his writing but doesn’t every Sondheim sound a bit… samey? Possibly because his music follows a fast paced speech rhythm, and his melodies prioritise non-linear structures with angular leaps, chromatic inflections, and unresolved contours. But saying that would make me sound a bit pretentious (moi?). So let’s just say, they’re all a bit ‘samey’.
For a bit of dazzle, this is a great show. But Sondheim is not for a first-time theatre-goer, just because of the complexity. Still, the fairytale plots make it wonderfully nostalgic and a fun evening out.

Into the Woods at the Bridge Theatre is a thoughtful revival of Stephen Sondheim and James Lapine’s 1986 musical, which was turned into a film with an all-star cast Meryl Streep, James Corden and Johnny Depp in 2014.
The story opens with a baker and his wife, desperate for a child, who are striving to overturn a witch’s curse that has left them childless. To do so, they need to go into the woods and find four ingredients: a red cape (Red Ridinghood – not a typo – that’s how it’s spelled in the score), a milky-white cow (Jack), golden hair (Rapunzel) and a glass slipper (I know you know that one). Each of the respective fairytale characters has their own individual quest somewhere in the woods, all of which overlap and collide in the first half until the characters come together to defeat Jack’s giant in the second half. Early ensemble numbers are brisk and clear, which helps you learn who the characters are and what slightly surreal subplots they each follow.
The cast features Jamie Parker as the Baker and Katie Brayben as the Baker’s Wife, Kate Fleetwood as the Witch, Chumisa Dornford-May as Cinderella, Bella Brown as Rapunzel, Jo Foster as Jack, Michael Gould as the Narrator, and strong support from Geoffrey Aymer, Jennifer Hepburn, Hana Ichijo and Julie Jupp. The Bridge Theatre’s space is used to pull you into the story, so characters enter and exit from all sides and scenes shift fluidly around you.
Jamie Parker (the original Harry Potter in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, the original Benjamin Button in… well, you get the point) is one of my favourite male musical theatre actors. His Baker begins as practical and cautious, voice and stance tight with worry, and grows into someone more pessimistic and accountable as the pressure rises and the deaths mount. Fleetwood’s Witch is magnetic without grandiosity. She blends bitterness and craving for control in a way that makes her more compelling than typical pantomime witches (this is very far from a panto, by the way; the show is grim and dark with a few comical moments). But her key solo, ‘Children Will Listen’, felt a little anticlimactic because the audience was anticipating it during the whole show; then there’s a bit of a ‘Oh, was that it?’ moment.
Sondheim’s lyrics and Lapine’s book are sharp, as you would expect. The text’s playfulness in the first half gives way to a harder edge in the second. A familiar refrain about being careful what you wish for is woven through the evening, and the ending is not a happy one.
I have to give a shout-out to the lighting, which slices the woods into shadows and beams that hint at unseen threats. It’s really impressive. Sound design keeps Sondheim’s notoriously tricky lyrics clear so you do not miss the clever turns of phrase that carry the show.
This show is technically brilliant and beautifully performed. And it’s so clever, with a fast-moving plot and an outstanding ability to keep the audience on the edge of their seat for the next twist. Personally, I go to most Sondheim’s with high expectations and always leave feeling a little cheated. You can appreciate the brilliance of his writing but doesn’t every Sondheim sound a bit… samey? Possibly because his music follows a fast paced speech rhythm, and his melodies prioritise non-linear structures with angular leaps, chromatic inflections, and unresolved contours. But saying that would make me sound a bit pretentious (moi?). So let’s just say, they’re all a bit ‘samey’.
For a bit of dazzle, this is a great show. But Sondheim is not for a first-time theatre-goer, just because of the complexity. Still, the fairytale plots make it wonderfully nostalgic and a fun evening out.
Review by Daniel Barnett
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Get ready to lead in a rapidly evolving digital landscape
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will