*/
Judiciary
Sir John Thomas, President of the Queen’s Bench Division, is to succeed Lord Judge as Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales on 1 October, following Lord Judge’s retirement.
Roger John Laugharne Thomas, 65, was born in Wales. He was educated at Rugby School and Trinity Hall, Cambridge, where he read law. Called to the Bar in 1969 by Gray’s Inn, he practised at the commercial Bar and took silk in 1984. Appointed recorder in 1987, he rapidly rose through the judicial ranks.
Sir John’s appointment to the £239,845 a year job was approved by the Queen in July, after a search was launched in May for a “vigorous, modernising, and imaginative individual”.
Outlining his priorities for the role, and acknowledging the inevitable tensions in “maintaining the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the rights of individuals”, Sir John said he would “endeavour to maintain confidence in the judiciary, its reputation and its high standards of integrity and impartiality” while it plays “a constructive role” in its relationships with government, Parliament and media. “In a time of reduced resources”, the judiciary would “play its leading part in ensuring that justice is delivered fairly and efficiently” and become “more reflective of our diverse society,” he added.
The appointment was a far cry from the outlawed “tap on the shoulder”. Following an amendment to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 by the Crime and Courts Act 2013, the selection panel had for the first time a lay member majority. The chairman of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), Christopher Stephens, the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, and the Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, were joined by two JAC lay members, Dame Valerie Strachan DCBE and Professor Noel Lloyd CBE.
Candidates were asked to complete an 18-page application form, including examples of recent significant judgments, the name of a senior civil servant with whom they had worked and a self-assessment. They also had to submit a written paper of up to 2,000 words on their approach to judicial reform and make a short impromptu presentation. Lengthy interviews, said to be “gruelling”, were held in early July.
Lord Judge, who steps down on 30 September after five years in the role, said that he was grateful to the JAC for the “painstaking care” they took “to analyse and assess an enormous body of material bearing on their recommendation”.
Running concurrently, but separately, was a JAC consultation on the “equal merit” provision. While confirming a commitment to the principle of appointment on merit, the JAC sought views on how, and at what point in the selection process, the “tipping factor” or “tie-break” provision might best be applied and to which groups of people. The provision clarifies that the JAC’s statutory duty to make selections “solely on merit” (s 63(2), CRA 2005) does not prevent it from selecting one candidate over another for the purpose of increasing judicial diversity, where two candidates are of equal merit.
Roger John Laugharne Thomas, 65, was born in Wales. He was educated at Rugby School and Trinity Hall, Cambridge, where he read law. Called to the Bar in 1969 by Gray’s Inn, he practised at the commercial Bar and took silk in 1984. Appointed recorder in 1987, he rapidly rose through the judicial ranks.
Sir John’s appointment to the £239,845 a year job was approved by the Queen in July, after a search was launched in May for a “vigorous, modernising, and imaginative individual”.
Outlining his priorities for the role, and acknowledging the inevitable tensions in “maintaining the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary and the rights of individuals”, Sir John said he would “endeavour to maintain confidence in the judiciary, its reputation and its high standards of integrity and impartiality” while it plays “a constructive role” in its relationships with government, Parliament and media. “In a time of reduced resources”, the judiciary would “play its leading part in ensuring that justice is delivered fairly and efficiently” and become “more reflective of our diverse society,” he added.
The appointment was a far cry from the outlawed “tap on the shoulder”. Following an amendment to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 by the Crime and Courts Act 2013, the selection panel had for the first time a lay member majority. The chairman of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), Christopher Stephens, the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, and the Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, were joined by two JAC lay members, Dame Valerie Strachan DCBE and Professor Noel Lloyd CBE.
Candidates were asked to complete an 18-page application form, including examples of recent significant judgments, the name of a senior civil servant with whom they had worked and a self-assessment. They also had to submit a written paper of up to 2,000 words on their approach to judicial reform and make a short impromptu presentation. Lengthy interviews, said to be “gruelling”, were held in early July.
Lord Judge, who steps down on 30 September after five years in the role, said that he was grateful to the JAC for the “painstaking care” they took “to analyse and assess an enormous body of material bearing on their recommendation”.
Running concurrently, but separately, was a JAC consultation on the “equal merit” provision. While confirming a commitment to the principle of appointment on merit, the JAC sought views on how, and at what point in the selection process, the “tipping factor” or “tie-break” provision might best be applied and to which groups of people. The provision clarifies that the JAC’s statutory duty to make selections “solely on merit” (s 63(2), CRA 2005) does not prevent it from selecting one candidate over another for the purpose of increasing judicial diversity, where two candidates are of equal merit.
Judiciary
Sir John Thomas, President of the Queen’s Bench Division, is to succeed Lord Judge as Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales on 1 October, following Lord Judge’s retirement.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt