*/
Taking action to make chambers fertility-friendly workspaces, Louise Corfield investigates the wellbeing and EDI issue few people are talking about – and its impact on members of the Bar
This issue came properly onto my radar during a review of Chambers’ parental leave policy, when feedback suggested that we needed more support around IVF treatment and fertility challenges. As a chambers, we decided to make a monetary payment available for people taking time off for fertility-related treatment or bereavement leave; a step that I think is probably rare. This raised questions about whether it should really form part of a ‘parental’ leave policy, and whether there was more that we could, or should, be doing to support people in chambers facing fertility challenges. It was time to find out more.
One in six people are affected by infertility, all of whom are of working age when they are affected. While often considered to be a ‘women’s health issue’, infertility isn’t gender specific. The physical nature of treatment will often predominantly impact women and their careers, but it is a people issue, that intersects across the workforce. Fertility treatment and alternative paths to parenthood also need to be recognised and supported within the workplace for the LGBTQ+ community looking to build their family.
Once I began to seek information, it became clear that infertility challenges have a massive impact on barristers. This impact is exacerbated by the fact that it is so often a subject that people don’t want to speak about, especially at work. Hiding something so huge going on in your life, alongside managing the very real practical challenges it throws up, is emotionally and physically exhausting. For many, managing the grief and emotional turmoil of not getting pregnant, failed IVF and/or early pregnancy loss (or all three, one after another), will have a huge impact. One barrister told me: ‘I was really struggling emotionally before it even began, from not getting pregnant’ and another that: ‘It’s like a kind of trauma, how difficult it is to have an experience of infertility. I still have a reaction, even after having my child, when people tell me they are pregnant. I don’t think it will ever go away.’
There are substantial practical difficulties for barristers:
The real-life impact of this is that barristers, especially those who do not feel empowered or willing to share this private ordeal with their clerks, will end up blocking out long periods from their diary, or turning away work, around the time of potential appointments, without any explanation. This reduces their earning potential in those periods and runs the risk of them appearing ‘flaky’ or ‘less committed’, which in turn brings its own anxiety about possible impact on career progress or not being taken seriously by clerks. One barrister told me: ‘There is always a slight trepidation of being “left behind” if you take too much time off.’
This difficulty is then coupled with the reality that different clerks, across a clerking team, will often repeatedly ask, in respect of different cases or opportunities, about one’s availability in a given period. ‘It’s hard for any self-employed barrister to turn down work. The treatment is hard, turning down work is hard, and having to do both at the same time is really upsetting. Then being constantly asked about it by clerks that don’t really understand is really hard to deal with.’
For many, IVF will be something that they have to undertake more than once, meaning that these challenges and career setbacks can continue not just for a few months, but over several years.
Firstly, raise awareness. I believe we were the first chambers to offer fertility awareness training to all clerks and barristers. We particularly encouraged attendance by clerks, practice managers and members of chambers with leadership roles. I approached Fertility Matters at Work, one of a small number of organisations who offer such training. They made it effortless to organise, but more importantly, skilfully brought to life the scale of the challenges being faced by so many in our own chambers, almost invisibly. Since then, the Chancery Bar Association helped promote awareness, via an online seminar, open to all, in January 2026.
Your own chambers and specialist Bar associations can straightforwardly raise awareness, and it makes a difference. It’s instrumental in creating a culture where barristers, and staff members, feel able to discuss their ongoing experiences and needs with (at least) their senior clerks. Knowing that clerks already have some understanding, and the individual in question doesn’t have to explain it all to them from scratch, can make it easier to talk about and to seek support. Training also helps clerks and chambers to develop and shape the practical support that can be offered. At lot of that will take the form of diary management. Depending on an individual’s practice and needs, that might be more flexible working, less travel, more papers, more led work (so they don’t necessarily need to be at hearings and can work as part of a team, so it’s not all on their shoulders), or having a single point of contact for bookings so they are not having to explain themselves again and again.
One barrister commented: ‘Once you are pregnant people get it and automatically are supportive and want to take pressure off. That needs to happen for IVF too.’ Others have said that raising awareness might improve a better understanding of the need to have fewer events serving alcohol and that if someone isn’t drinking it might not be because they are pregnant; if choosing not to drink during IVF, the ‘knowing’ smiles of people thinking that means a pregnancy can be heartbreaking.
Secondly, mentors – inside or outside of chambers – could provide a fantastic and much needed support network. The Chancery Bar Association is setting up an informal scheme, and we are doing so in Chambers too. Someone who has had a really difficult IVF journey told me: ‘It’s so helpful to talk to anyone who has experience of IVF, but to talk to someone who had experience of IVF and being a barrister was really nice.’
Thirdly, review your policies. Couching fertility support in terms of ‘pregnancy leave’, or within a ‘parental leave’ policy, can be soul destroying when someone is unsuccessfully trying to get pregnant. Consider a separate standalone policy, promoting chambers’ desire and commitment to providing support and flexible working, or integrate fertility into ‘wellbeing’ initiatives instead.
See also ‘Fertility and the Bar’, Karlia Lykourgou, Counsel, September 2024: – an argument for chambers-funded egg-freezing loans
This issue came properly onto my radar during a review of Chambers’ parental leave policy, when feedback suggested that we needed more support around IVF treatment and fertility challenges. As a chambers, we decided to make a monetary payment available for people taking time off for fertility-related treatment or bereavement leave; a step that I think is probably rare. This raised questions about whether it should really form part of a ‘parental’ leave policy, and whether there was more that we could, or should, be doing to support people in chambers facing fertility challenges. It was time to find out more.
One in six people are affected by infertility, all of whom are of working age when they are affected. While often considered to be a ‘women’s health issue’, infertility isn’t gender specific. The physical nature of treatment will often predominantly impact women and their careers, but it is a people issue, that intersects across the workforce. Fertility treatment and alternative paths to parenthood also need to be recognised and supported within the workplace for the LGBTQ+ community looking to build their family.
Once I began to seek information, it became clear that infertility challenges have a massive impact on barristers. This impact is exacerbated by the fact that it is so often a subject that people don’t want to speak about, especially at work. Hiding something so huge going on in your life, alongside managing the very real practical challenges it throws up, is emotionally and physically exhausting. For many, managing the grief and emotional turmoil of not getting pregnant, failed IVF and/or early pregnancy loss (or all three, one after another), will have a huge impact. One barrister told me: ‘I was really struggling emotionally before it even began, from not getting pregnant’ and another that: ‘It’s like a kind of trauma, how difficult it is to have an experience of infertility. I still have a reaction, even after having my child, when people tell me they are pregnant. I don’t think it will ever go away.’
There are substantial practical difficulties for barristers:
The real-life impact of this is that barristers, especially those who do not feel empowered or willing to share this private ordeal with their clerks, will end up blocking out long periods from their diary, or turning away work, around the time of potential appointments, without any explanation. This reduces their earning potential in those periods and runs the risk of them appearing ‘flaky’ or ‘less committed’, which in turn brings its own anxiety about possible impact on career progress or not being taken seriously by clerks. One barrister told me: ‘There is always a slight trepidation of being “left behind” if you take too much time off.’
This difficulty is then coupled with the reality that different clerks, across a clerking team, will often repeatedly ask, in respect of different cases or opportunities, about one’s availability in a given period. ‘It’s hard for any self-employed barrister to turn down work. The treatment is hard, turning down work is hard, and having to do both at the same time is really upsetting. Then being constantly asked about it by clerks that don’t really understand is really hard to deal with.’
For many, IVF will be something that they have to undertake more than once, meaning that these challenges and career setbacks can continue not just for a few months, but over several years.
Firstly, raise awareness. I believe we were the first chambers to offer fertility awareness training to all clerks and barristers. We particularly encouraged attendance by clerks, practice managers and members of chambers with leadership roles. I approached Fertility Matters at Work, one of a small number of organisations who offer such training. They made it effortless to organise, but more importantly, skilfully brought to life the scale of the challenges being faced by so many in our own chambers, almost invisibly. Since then, the Chancery Bar Association helped promote awareness, via an online seminar, open to all, in January 2026.
Your own chambers and specialist Bar associations can straightforwardly raise awareness, and it makes a difference. It’s instrumental in creating a culture where barristers, and staff members, feel able to discuss their ongoing experiences and needs with (at least) their senior clerks. Knowing that clerks already have some understanding, and the individual in question doesn’t have to explain it all to them from scratch, can make it easier to talk about and to seek support. Training also helps clerks and chambers to develop and shape the practical support that can be offered. At lot of that will take the form of diary management. Depending on an individual’s practice and needs, that might be more flexible working, less travel, more papers, more led work (so they don’t necessarily need to be at hearings and can work as part of a team, so it’s not all on their shoulders), or having a single point of contact for bookings so they are not having to explain themselves again and again.
One barrister commented: ‘Once you are pregnant people get it and automatically are supportive and want to take pressure off. That needs to happen for IVF too.’ Others have said that raising awareness might improve a better understanding of the need to have fewer events serving alcohol and that if someone isn’t drinking it might not be because they are pregnant; if choosing not to drink during IVF, the ‘knowing’ smiles of people thinking that means a pregnancy can be heartbreaking.
Secondly, mentors – inside or outside of chambers – could provide a fantastic and much needed support network. The Chancery Bar Association is setting up an informal scheme, and we are doing so in Chambers too. Someone who has had a really difficult IVF journey told me: ‘It’s so helpful to talk to anyone who has experience of IVF, but to talk to someone who had experience of IVF and being a barrister was really nice.’
Thirdly, review your policies. Couching fertility support in terms of ‘pregnancy leave’, or within a ‘parental leave’ policy, can be soul destroying when someone is unsuccessfully trying to get pregnant. Consider a separate standalone policy, promoting chambers’ desire and commitment to providing support and flexible working, or integrate fertility into ‘wellbeing’ initiatives instead.
See also ‘Fertility and the Bar’, Karlia Lykourgou, Counsel, September 2024: – an argument for chambers-funded egg-freezing loans
Taking action to make chambers fertility-friendly workspaces, Louise Corfield investigates the wellbeing and EDI issue few people are talking about – and its impact on members of the Bar
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Get ready to lead in a rapidly evolving digital landscape
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will