*/
Profession
“People are acutely conscious of their vulnerability when using legal services” and are “intimidated by the law and lawyers”, according to Empowering Consumers, a report from the Legal Services Consumer Panel.
Published in March, the report presented the first phase of research commissioned by the Legal Services Board (LSB) and found an unequal power relationship between consumers and providers. Vulnerable consumers were “less confident, less trusting, less knowledgeable, less likely to shop around, less satisfied and less likely to complain”. Empowering consumers is therefore going to be “an uphill struggle”: 42% of people do nothing when dissatisfied with the service received; 71% of consumers are satisfied with ongoing communication during their matter, but this is one of the lowest rated aspects of customer service.
One of the problems is said to be “the complex regulatory landscape, with its multiple regulators and mixture of reserved and unreserved activities” which should be simplified for consumers, “even if this means hiding the actual complexities behind-the-scenes”. Above all, “the range of information that consumers need” should be delivered in a useful form, such as making “the legal activity rather than the type of lawyer the central organising principle”.
Codes of conduct should be harmonised – “there is no good reason in principle why lawyers doing essentially the same work should have to follow different rules”. In addition, “greater visibility of providers through more advertising, wider choice, growth in fixed fee deals and packaging of legal services in simpler language” – all early trends since the introduction of alternative business structures – should assist to empower consumers. The Panel felt that there was a compelling moral and economic case to strengthen prevention through creating the equivalent of NHS Direct for law, “using intelligent technology to provide a form of early diagnosis which people are most likely to use when experiencing a problem in order to work out what to do next”.
Nevertheless, consumer empowerment alone is not enough to deliver the regulatory objectives, the report said: “The LSB must ensure effective regulation before it can expect consumers to drive competition.”
The Panel has also released its response to the Transforming Legal Aid consultation, which focuses on the impact of the proposal to deny consumers the right to choose their own defence lawyers.
Published in March, the report presented the first phase of research commissioned by the Legal Services Board (LSB) and found an unequal power relationship between consumers and providers. Vulnerable consumers were “less confident, less trusting, less knowledgeable, less likely to shop around, less satisfied and less likely to complain”. Empowering consumers is therefore going to be “an uphill struggle”: 42% of people do nothing when dissatisfied with the service received; 71% of consumers are satisfied with ongoing communication during their matter, but this is one of the lowest rated aspects of customer service.
One of the problems is said to be “the complex regulatory landscape, with its multiple regulators and mixture of reserved and unreserved activities” which should be simplified for consumers, “even if this means hiding the actual complexities behind-the-scenes”. Above all, “the range of information that consumers need” should be delivered in a useful form, such as making “the legal activity rather than the type of lawyer the central organising principle”.
Codes of conduct should be harmonised – “there is no good reason in principle why lawyers doing essentially the same work should have to follow different rules”. In addition, “greater visibility of providers through more advertising, wider choice, growth in fixed fee deals and packaging of legal services in simpler language” – all early trends since the introduction of alternative business structures – should assist to empower consumers. The Panel felt that there was a compelling moral and economic case to strengthen prevention through creating the equivalent of NHS Direct for law, “using intelligent technology to provide a form of early diagnosis which people are most likely to use when experiencing a problem in order to work out what to do next”.
Nevertheless, consumer empowerment alone is not enough to deliver the regulatory objectives, the report said: “The LSB must ensure effective regulation before it can expect consumers to drive competition.”
The Panel has also released its response to the Transforming Legal Aid consultation, which focuses on the impact of the proposal to deny consumers the right to choose their own defence lawyers.
Profession
“People are acutely conscious of their vulnerability when using legal services” and are “intimidated by the law and lawyers”, according to Empowering Consumers, a report from the Legal Services Consumer Panel.
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
The long-running fee-paid judicial pensions saga continues. The current cut-off date for giving notice of election to join FPJPS is 31 March 2024, and that date now gives rise to a serious problem, warns HH John Platt