*/
Profession
“People are acutely conscious of their vulnerability when using legal services” and are “intimidated by the law and lawyers”, according to Empowering Consumers, a report from the Legal Services Consumer Panel.
Published in March, the report presented the first phase of research commissioned by the Legal Services Board (LSB) and found an unequal power relationship between consumers and providers. Vulnerable consumers were “less confident, less trusting, less knowledgeable, less likely to shop around, less satisfied and less likely to complain”. Empowering consumers is therefore going to be “an uphill struggle”: 42% of people do nothing when dissatisfied with the service received; 71% of consumers are satisfied with ongoing communication during their matter, but this is one of the lowest rated aspects of customer service.
One of the problems is said to be “the complex regulatory landscape, with its multiple regulators and mixture of reserved and unreserved activities” which should be simplified for consumers, “even if this means hiding the actual complexities behind-the-scenes”. Above all, “the range of information that consumers need” should be delivered in a useful form, such as making “the legal activity rather than the type of lawyer the central organising principle”.
Codes of conduct should be harmonised – “there is no good reason in principle why lawyers doing essentially the same work should have to follow different rules”. In addition, “greater visibility of providers through more advertising, wider choice, growth in fixed fee deals and packaging of legal services in simpler language” – all early trends since the introduction of alternative business structures – should assist to empower consumers. The Panel felt that there was a compelling moral and economic case to strengthen prevention through creating the equivalent of NHS Direct for law, “using intelligent technology to provide a form of early diagnosis which people are most likely to use when experiencing a problem in order to work out what to do next”.
Nevertheless, consumer empowerment alone is not enough to deliver the regulatory objectives, the report said: “The LSB must ensure effective regulation before it can expect consumers to drive competition.”
The Panel has also released its response to the Transforming Legal Aid consultation, which focuses on the impact of the proposal to deny consumers the right to choose their own defence lawyers.
Published in March, the report presented the first phase of research commissioned by the Legal Services Board (LSB) and found an unequal power relationship between consumers and providers. Vulnerable consumers were “less confident, less trusting, less knowledgeable, less likely to shop around, less satisfied and less likely to complain”. Empowering consumers is therefore going to be “an uphill struggle”: 42% of people do nothing when dissatisfied with the service received; 71% of consumers are satisfied with ongoing communication during their matter, but this is one of the lowest rated aspects of customer service.
One of the problems is said to be “the complex regulatory landscape, with its multiple regulators and mixture of reserved and unreserved activities” which should be simplified for consumers, “even if this means hiding the actual complexities behind-the-scenes”. Above all, “the range of information that consumers need” should be delivered in a useful form, such as making “the legal activity rather than the type of lawyer the central organising principle”.
Codes of conduct should be harmonised – “there is no good reason in principle why lawyers doing essentially the same work should have to follow different rules”. In addition, “greater visibility of providers through more advertising, wider choice, growth in fixed fee deals and packaging of legal services in simpler language” – all early trends since the introduction of alternative business structures – should assist to empower consumers. The Panel felt that there was a compelling moral and economic case to strengthen prevention through creating the equivalent of NHS Direct for law, “using intelligent technology to provide a form of early diagnosis which people are most likely to use when experiencing a problem in order to work out what to do next”.
Nevertheless, consumer empowerment alone is not enough to deliver the regulatory objectives, the report said: “The LSB must ensure effective regulation before it can expect consumers to drive competition.”
The Panel has also released its response to the Transforming Legal Aid consultation, which focuses on the impact of the proposal to deny consumers the right to choose their own defence lawyers.
Profession
“People are acutely conscious of their vulnerability when using legal services” and are “intimidated by the law and lawyers”, according to Empowering Consumers, a report from the Legal Services Consumer Panel.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
