*/
Court fees for child care proceedings could be abolished, following a recommendation in the Lord Laming report on child protection.
The report, commissioned by Children’s Secretary Ed Balls MP in the wake of the Baby P tragedy, makes 58 recommendations for change, including abolishing the court fees for child care cases—which rose 3,000% in May 2008—from 2010/11.
It warns there has been an “over-emphasis on process and targets” rather than tackling risks, which has caused social workers to lose confidence.
Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, commented: “The Bar Council has consistently warned about the effect of the enormous rise in court fees...on local authorities’ ability to initiate child care proceedings. It was inevitable that an increase from £150 to £4,825 for a fully contested matter would deter some authorities from acting.”
Justice Secretary Jack Straw has appointed Francis Plowden, a member of the Judicial Appointments Commission, to lead an independent review into court fees in public law cases to assess whether they do act as a deterrent in commencing care proceedings.
“If there is evidence that they are a barrier for local authorities when deciding whether to proceed with a care order for a vulnerable child, we will abolish them,” said Ed Balls.
The report, commissioned by Children’s Secretary Ed Balls MP in the wake of the Baby P tragedy, makes 58 recommendations for change, including abolishing the court fees for child care cases—which rose 3,000% in May 2008—from 2010/11.
It warns there has been an “over-emphasis on process and targets” rather than tackling risks, which has caused social workers to lose confidence.
Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, commented: “The Bar Council has consistently warned about the effect of the enormous rise in court fees...on local authorities’ ability to initiate child care proceedings. It was inevitable that an increase from £150 to £4,825 for a fully contested matter would deter some authorities from acting.”
Justice Secretary Jack Straw has appointed Francis Plowden, a member of the Judicial Appointments Commission, to lead an independent review into court fees in public law cases to assess whether they do act as a deterrent in commencing care proceedings.
“If there is evidence that they are a barrier for local authorities when deciding whether to proceed with a care order for a vulnerable child, we will abolish them,” said Ed Balls.
Court fees for child care proceedings could be abolished, following a recommendation in the Lord Laming report on child protection.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
A career shaped by advocacy beyond her practice, and the realities of living with an invisible disability – Dr Natasha Shotunde, Black Barristers’ Network Co-Founder and its Chair for seven years, reflects on a decade at the Bar
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
