*/
THE Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has consulted the profession on outline proposals for revising the Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) process for the selection of selfemployed advocates. The proposals were drawn up following lengthy discussions between the Bar Council and CPS about the new Panel Scheme which the CPS wishes to introduce.
The proposals would see the current advocates’ lists replaced with a smaller panel, for cases at levels two to four (with lists broadly maintained for level one). There would be an open competition for advocates to join the panel; a clear focus on quality as part of the selection criteria and a greater opportunity to prosecute for those who secure a place. One criticism of the current system is that many on the existing lists are rarely or never instructed. An important aspect of the proposed scheme is the creation of a stable relationship between the CPS and the Bar for the foreseeable future, which addresses key issues such as quality, volume of work, and size of panel.
Nicholas Green QC, Chairman of the Bar Council, said:
“The proposals reflect a new understanding between the Bar and the CPS and a real desire to build a solid foundation for a mutually beneficial relationship. In these difficult economic times concessions, necessarily, have been made on both sides to enable us to move towards the current position. It is now important that the views of the Bar are considered and, in the light of those responses, to continue our dialogue with the CPS on a positive footing”.
Keir Starmer QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions said:
“Ensuring that all prosecution advocates meet the high standard necessary to deliver justice is a top priority for both the CPS and the Bar Council. We have jointly developed this proposal for a system that will improve quality by allowing the self-employed bar access to prosecution work through a competency based application process and by moving to smaller panels of advocates who will focus on high quality prosecution work alongside our in-house advocates. We now look forward to examining the views of practising barristers on this proposal and our discussions with the Bar Council will move forward in due course.”
The Attorney General, the Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP said:
“We are in a period of fundamental review; an opportunity for root and branch reform. I commend both the CPS and Bar Council for this approach and I am looking forward to them using all their professional skills, creativity and innovation to deliver the core prosecution services which the public needs, to an even higher standard.”
The proposals would see the current advocates’ lists replaced with a smaller panel, for cases at levels two to four (with lists broadly maintained for level one). There would be an open competition for advocates to join the panel; a clear focus on quality as part of the selection criteria and a greater opportunity to prosecute for those who secure a place. One criticism of the current system is that many on the existing lists are rarely or never instructed. An important aspect of the proposed scheme is the creation of a stable relationship between the CPS and the Bar for the foreseeable future, which addresses key issues such as quality, volume of work, and size of panel.
Nicholas Green QC, Chairman of the Bar Council, said:
“The proposals reflect a new understanding between the Bar and the CPS and a real desire to build a solid foundation for a mutually beneficial relationship. In these difficult economic times concessions, necessarily, have been made on both sides to enable us to move towards the current position. It is now important that the views of the Bar are considered and, in the light of those responses, to continue our dialogue with the CPS on a positive footing”.
Keir Starmer QC, the Director of Public Prosecutions said:
“Ensuring that all prosecution advocates meet the high standard necessary to deliver justice is a top priority for both the CPS and the Bar Council. We have jointly developed this proposal for a system that will improve quality by allowing the self-employed bar access to prosecution work through a competency based application process and by moving to smaller panels of advocates who will focus on high quality prosecution work alongside our in-house advocates. We now look forward to examining the views of practising barristers on this proposal and our discussions with the Bar Council will move forward in due course.”
The Attorney General, the Rt Hon Dominic Grieve QC MP said:
“We are in a period of fundamental review; an opportunity for root and branch reform. I commend both the CPS and Bar Council for this approach and I am looking forward to them using all their professional skills, creativity and innovation to deliver the core prosecution services which the public needs, to an even higher standard.”
THE Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has consulted the profession on outline proposals for revising the Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) process for the selection of selfemployed advocates. The proposals were drawn up following lengthy discussions between the Bar Council and CPS about the new Panel Scheme which the CPS wishes to introduce.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
In an era of patient-centred care and growing concern over misconduct in medical settings, why do women still lack the right to choose women consultants for examination and treatment? Charles Davey investigates
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
