*/
THE Chairman of the Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has reacted angrily to the deep cuts to publicly funded criminal barristers’ fees, which came into force on 27 April 2010. Barristers’ fixed fees for criminal defence will be cut by a total of 13.5% over the next 3 years starting with an immediate cut of 4.5%.
These cuts are contained in legislation rushed through Parliament by the Ministry of Justice the day after the Easter break, the same day the election was announced.
The Chairman of the Bar, Nicholas Green QC said:
“We are extremely angry that the Government decided in a few days over Easter, and in the dying throes of the last Parliament, to impose these savage cuts. It appears to have little concern for the consequences on the administration of justice and the public interest in
ensuring access to justice. The Bar does not seek to avoid its fair share of the pain arising out of cuts to public spending but no other part of the public sector has been required to accept a cut of this depth in pay.
Moreover, there are far better ways of making savings which will do much less harm to the administration of justice. The Bar has made it clear that it is committed to working with government to make savings, but these approaches have been ignored. Given the unnecessary haste with which these cuts were imposed, the Bar must debate their impact on all levels of the profession and particularly on the Young Bar, which will be most badly affected by them. I am eager to convene a meeting of the Bar in order to hear the voice of the profession on this issue so that we can consider our options and agree the way forward.”
He added:
“The Government has claimed that it will not cut front-line services, but that is exactly what these cuts will achieve. We oppose these cuts
in the strongest possible terms and will canvass the views of the profession as a whole, to ensure its voice is heard.”
These cuts are contained in legislation rushed through Parliament by the Ministry of Justice the day after the Easter break, the same day the election was announced.
The Chairman of the Bar, Nicholas Green QC said:
“We are extremely angry that the Government decided in a few days over Easter, and in the dying throes of the last Parliament, to impose these savage cuts. It appears to have little concern for the consequences on the administration of justice and the public interest in
ensuring access to justice. The Bar does not seek to avoid its fair share of the pain arising out of cuts to public spending but no other part of the public sector has been required to accept a cut of this depth in pay.
Moreover, there are far better ways of making savings which will do much less harm to the administration of justice. The Bar has made it clear that it is committed to working with government to make savings, but these approaches have been ignored. Given the unnecessary haste with which these cuts were imposed, the Bar must debate their impact on all levels of the profession and particularly on the Young Bar, which will be most badly affected by them. I am eager to convene a meeting of the Bar in order to hear the voice of the profession on this issue so that we can consider our options and agree the way forward.”
He added:
“The Government has claimed that it will not cut front-line services, but that is exactly what these cuts will achieve. We oppose these cuts
in the strongest possible terms and will canvass the views of the profession as a whole, to ensure its voice is heard.”
THE Chairman of the Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, has reacted angrily to the deep cuts to publicly funded criminal barristers’ fees, which came into force on 27 April 2010. Barristers’ fixed fees for criminal defence will be cut by a total of 13.5% over the next 3 years starting with an immediate cut of 4.5%.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
Responding to criticism on the narrow profile of government-instructed counsel, Mel Nebhrajani CB describes the system-wide change at GLD to drive fairer distribution of work and broader development of talent
The odds of success are as unforgiving as ever, but ambition clearly isn’t in short supply. David Wurtzel’s annual deep‑dive into the competition cohort shows who’s entering, who’s thriving and the trends that will define the next wave
Where to start and where to find help? Monisha Shah, Chair of the King’s Counsel Selection Panel, provides an overview of the silk selection process, debunking some myths along the way
Do chatbot providers owe a duty of care for negligent misstatements? Jasper Wong suggests that the principles applicable to humans should apply equally to machines
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
