Sentence – Confiscation order. The Administrative Court held that, although a person the subject of a confiscation order was entitled to know the balance outstanding, that information had already been supplied to the defendant. The application was, in reality, an attempt to challenge the figure outstanding and to argue about the enforcement receiver's remuneration. Further, realised sums were not to be paid towards the confiscation order before paying the receiver's remuneration and, whilst it was likely to be appropriate to order the proper assessment of the receiver's remuneration, the present application was premature.