Gibson, petitioner

Expenses – Protective expenses order. Court of Session: Refusing a motion by a petitioner, who sought judicial review of a decision not to hold a public enquiry and to grant consent for construction and operation of a wind farm, for a protective expenses order under Rule of Court 58A.3, limiting his liability in expenses, the court concluded that, having regard to the petitioner's financial position as a whole, it was not satisfied that he had made out that he could not reasonably proceed with the proceedings in the absence of a protective expenses order.