Latest Cases

Town and country planning – Permission for development. The Planning Court dismissed the claimant local planning authority's challenge to the decision of the inspector appointed by the first defendant Secretary of State, allowing the second defendant's appeal against its refusal of planning permission for the erection of up to 90 dwellings. The inspector had not erred, in particular, with respect to housing need. 

Criminal law – Wounding with intent. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, held, that following a Goodyear indication, a sentence of 18 months' imprisonment for wounding with intent, contrary to s 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, had been unduly lenient. The offender's mitigation had not been sufficient to have justified a departure from the Sentencing Council's Definitive Guidelines: Assault. Consequently, the sentence would be quashed and substituted for a term of five years' imprisonment. 

Practice – Pre-trial or post-judgment relief. The Queen's Bench Division struck out the claimant's claim in libel on the basis of s 32A of the Limitation Act 1980. Following the expiry of a stay there had been an unexplained period of delay in a case which was in any event weak and one which the claimant was seeking to expand. 

Family proceedings – Orders in family proceedings. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellant's appeal against two case management decisions made in preparation for a fact-finding hearing, namely, that certain witnesses would not give oral evidence at trial, and, save in one respect, dismissed his appeal against the findings of fact themselves. 

Immigration – Leave to remain. The Administrative Court dismissed the claimant Indian nationals' application for judicial review of the defendant Secretary of State's refusal of the first claimant's application for further leave to remain. The decision had not been a nullity, as an abuse of power and the claimants had not been unlawfully detained. 

Insolvency – Receivership – Ranking preference as between floating charge holder and inhibiting creditor. Court of Session: In a case in which the court revisited the issue of ranking preference as between a floating charge holder and an inhibiting creditor, and considered afresh the meaning of the phrase 'effectually executed diligence' it held that the pursuer's first plea in law must be repelled regardless of whether an inhibition registered in the pursuer's favour fell properly to be categorised as an effectually executed diligence on the two houses owned by the defender, but that the pursuer's alternative argument succeeded—ie that even if the inhibition was not an effectually executed diligence, it nevertheless ranked ahead of a bank's floating charge with regard to debt incurred after the inhibition. 

Housing – Homeless person. The Administrative Court dismissed the claimants' judicial review proceedings, claiming that the manner in which the defendant local housing authority had dealt with their applications for housing as a homeless person had been unlawful and had reflected systemic failings. The individual claims failed because there had been no breach of statutory duty or any breach was minor and did not warrant relief. Further, the possible breach of duty had not arguably supported a claim of systemic failure as was alleged in the general claim. 

Conflict of laws – Jurisdiction. The Commercial Court dismissed an application by Muktar Ablyazov's son-in-law (I) to set aside a claim form and worldwide freezing order which had been issued against him where the claimant Russian bank had established a good arguable case that I had committed the tort of conspiracy to injure by unlawful means and where, notwithstanding that he was domiciled in Switzerland, the English court had jurisdiction under art 5(3) of the Lugano Convention on the basis that the alleged conspiracy had been hatched in England in the period before 16 February 2012. 

Company – Scheme of arrangement. The Chancery Division adjourned a hearing to convene a single class of creditors to consider a scheme of arrangement in respect of the applicant company, Indah Kiat International Finance Company B.V. Among other things, it considered that 14 days was inadequate notice for a convening hearing for a scheme of the present type, which was neither simple nor straightforward. Even if the notice to the creditors had been adequate, an order convening a single meeting of scheme creditors would not have been made because the evidence adduced by the company as to the appropriate composition of the scheme meetings and draft explanatory statement were materially deficient in their current form. 

Extradition – Human rights. Sheriff Court: In a case in which the Government of the USA sought a Pakistani citizen's extradition for prosecution on nine serious fraud charges, an application which was opposed based on s 87 of the Extradition Act 2003 and alleged contraventions of art 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights, art 3 (freedom from torture), art 5 (right to liberty) and art 6 (right to a fair trial), the court held that extradition would be compatible with the respondent's Convention rights, within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998, and was satisfied that that the case could safely be sent to the Scottish Ministers for their final decision on whether the respondent was to be extradited.