*/
How to cross-examine your Gen AI tools and interrogate the outputs? Sally McLaren’s tips for using AI safely in legal research
Unless you’ve been completely off-grid for the past 12 months or so, you’ve likely encountered the deluge of news, articles, explainers, and enthusiastic LinkedIn posts about the wonders and/or terrors of Generative AI.
If you have been offline and missed it all, then congratulations! It’s been a lot! This bit is for you. The AI savvy/weary may skip ahead:
The term ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) has been in use since the 1950s and refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines, enabling them to perform tasks that typically require human-like understanding, reasoning, learning, and problem-solving.
Generative AI (Gen AI) is a type of AI that can create or generate content, such as text, images, or other data, by learning from large datasets and producing novel outputs based on observed patterns. Popular examples include: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini.
There are probably as many Gen AI evangelists as there are prophets of doom, but in between the two camps is a DMZ populated by many more wary adopters, curious skeptics and AI casuals. It is increasingly unrealistic to think that students, pupils, barristers, or indeed law librarians, won’t be using Gen AI. Quite the opposite. Leveraging these new tools is fast becoming a marketable skill. However, as useful as Gen AI can be, there is a significant degree of risk attached to employing it in your studies and practice.
Here are eight tips to help minimise the risks associated with using Gen AI:
Gen AI is just another tool to be leveraged, albeit carefully. Investing time in mastering this new skill and learning more about risks and effective use is key. Explore a curated list of online courses, many of which are free, here.
Unless you’ve been completely off-grid for the past 12 months or so, you’ve likely encountered the deluge of news, articles, explainers, and enthusiastic LinkedIn posts about the wonders and/or terrors of Generative AI.
If you have been offline and missed it all, then congratulations! It’s been a lot! This bit is for you. The AI savvy/weary may skip ahead:
The term ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) has been in use since the 1950s and refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines, enabling them to perform tasks that typically require human-like understanding, reasoning, learning, and problem-solving.
Generative AI (Gen AI) is a type of AI that can create or generate content, such as text, images, or other data, by learning from large datasets and producing novel outputs based on observed patterns. Popular examples include: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini.
There are probably as many Gen AI evangelists as there are prophets of doom, but in between the two camps is a DMZ populated by many more wary adopters, curious skeptics and AI casuals. It is increasingly unrealistic to think that students, pupils, barristers, or indeed law librarians, won’t be using Gen AI. Quite the opposite. Leveraging these new tools is fast becoming a marketable skill. However, as useful as Gen AI can be, there is a significant degree of risk attached to employing it in your studies and practice.
Here are eight tips to help minimise the risks associated with using Gen AI:
Gen AI is just another tool to be leveraged, albeit carefully. Investing time in mastering this new skill and learning more about risks and effective use is key. Explore a curated list of online courses, many of which are free, here.
How to cross-examine your Gen AI tools and interrogate the outputs? Sally McLaren’s tips for using AI safely in legal research
The Bar Council continues to call for investment for the justice system and represent the interests of our profession both at home and abroad
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
The Amazonian artist’s first international solo exhibition is wholly relevant to current issues in social and environmental justice, says Stephen Cragg KC
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
It’s been five years since the groundbreaking QC competition in which six Black women barristers, including the 2025 Chair of the Bar, took silk. Yet today, the number of Black KCs remains ‘critically low’. Desirée Artesi talks to Baroness Scotland KC, Allison Munroe KC and Melanie Simpson KC about the critical success factors, barriers and ideas for embedding change