*/
How to cross-examine your Gen AI tools and interrogate the outputs? Sally McLaren’s tips for using AI safely in legal research
Unless you’ve been completely off-grid for the past 12 months or so, you’ve likely encountered the deluge of news, articles, explainers, and enthusiastic LinkedIn posts about the wonders and/or terrors of Generative AI.
If you have been offline and missed it all, then congratulations! It’s been a lot! This bit is for you. The AI savvy/weary may skip ahead:
The term ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) has been in use since the 1950s and refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines, enabling them to perform tasks that typically require human-like understanding, reasoning, learning, and problem-solving.
Generative AI (Gen AI) is a type of AI that can create or generate content, such as text, images, or other data, by learning from large datasets and producing novel outputs based on observed patterns. Popular examples include: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini.
There are probably as many Gen AI evangelists as there are prophets of doom, but in between the two camps is a DMZ populated by many more wary adopters, curious skeptics and AI casuals. It is increasingly unrealistic to think that students, pupils, barristers, or indeed law librarians, won’t be using Gen AI. Quite the opposite. Leveraging these new tools is fast becoming a marketable skill. However, as useful as Gen AI can be, there is a significant degree of risk attached to employing it in your studies and practice.
Here are eight tips to help minimise the risks associated with using Gen AI:
Gen AI is just another tool to be leveraged, albeit carefully. Investing time in mastering this new skill and learning more about risks and effective use is key. Explore a curated list of online courses, many of which are free, here.
Unless you’ve been completely off-grid for the past 12 months or so, you’ve likely encountered the deluge of news, articles, explainers, and enthusiastic LinkedIn posts about the wonders and/or terrors of Generative AI.
If you have been offline and missed it all, then congratulations! It’s been a lot! This bit is for you. The AI savvy/weary may skip ahead:
The term ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) has been in use since the 1950s and refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines, enabling them to perform tasks that typically require human-like understanding, reasoning, learning, and problem-solving.
Generative AI (Gen AI) is a type of AI that can create or generate content, such as text, images, or other data, by learning from large datasets and producing novel outputs based on observed patterns. Popular examples include: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini.
There are probably as many Gen AI evangelists as there are prophets of doom, but in between the two camps is a DMZ populated by many more wary adopters, curious skeptics and AI casuals. It is increasingly unrealistic to think that students, pupils, barristers, or indeed law librarians, won’t be using Gen AI. Quite the opposite. Leveraging these new tools is fast becoming a marketable skill. However, as useful as Gen AI can be, there is a significant degree of risk attached to employing it in your studies and practice.
Here are eight tips to help minimise the risks associated with using Gen AI:
Gen AI is just another tool to be leveraged, albeit carefully. Investing time in mastering this new skill and learning more about risks and effective use is key. Explore a curated list of online courses, many of which are free, here.
How to cross-examine your Gen AI tools and interrogate the outputs? Sally McLaren’s tips for using AI safely in legal research
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base