*/
How to cross-examine your Gen AI tools and interrogate the outputs? Sally McLaren’s tips for using AI safely in legal research
Unless you’ve been completely off-grid for the past 12 months or so, you’ve likely encountered the deluge of news, articles, explainers, and enthusiastic LinkedIn posts about the wonders and/or terrors of Generative AI.
If you have been offline and missed it all, then congratulations! It’s been a lot! This bit is for you. The AI savvy/weary may skip ahead:
The term ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) has been in use since the 1950s and refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines, enabling them to perform tasks that typically require human-like understanding, reasoning, learning, and problem-solving.
Generative AI (Gen AI) is a type of AI that can create or generate content, such as text, images, or other data, by learning from large datasets and producing novel outputs based on observed patterns. Popular examples include: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini.
There are probably as many Gen AI evangelists as there are prophets of doom, but in between the two camps is a DMZ populated by many more wary adopters, curious skeptics and AI casuals. It is increasingly unrealistic to think that students, pupils, barristers, or indeed law librarians, won’t be using Gen AI. Quite the opposite. Leveraging these new tools is fast becoming a marketable skill. However, as useful as Gen AI can be, there is a significant degree of risk attached to employing it in your studies and practice.
Here are eight tips to help minimise the risks associated with using Gen AI:
Gen AI is just another tool to be leveraged, albeit carefully. Investing time in mastering this new skill and learning more about risks and effective use is key. Explore a curated list of online courses, many of which are free, here.
Unless you’ve been completely off-grid for the past 12 months or so, you’ve likely encountered the deluge of news, articles, explainers, and enthusiastic LinkedIn posts about the wonders and/or terrors of Generative AI.
If you have been offline and missed it all, then congratulations! It’s been a lot! This bit is for you. The AI savvy/weary may skip ahead:
The term ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) has been in use since the 1950s and refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines, enabling them to perform tasks that typically require human-like understanding, reasoning, learning, and problem-solving.
Generative AI (Gen AI) is a type of AI that can create or generate content, such as text, images, or other data, by learning from large datasets and producing novel outputs based on observed patterns. Popular examples include: ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini.
There are probably as many Gen AI evangelists as there are prophets of doom, but in between the two camps is a DMZ populated by many more wary adopters, curious skeptics and AI casuals. It is increasingly unrealistic to think that students, pupils, barristers, or indeed law librarians, won’t be using Gen AI. Quite the opposite. Leveraging these new tools is fast becoming a marketable skill. However, as useful as Gen AI can be, there is a significant degree of risk attached to employing it in your studies and practice.
Here are eight tips to help minimise the risks associated with using Gen AI:
Gen AI is just another tool to be leveraged, albeit carefully. Investing time in mastering this new skill and learning more about risks and effective use is key. Explore a curated list of online courses, many of which are free, here.
How to cross-examine your Gen AI tools and interrogate the outputs? Sally McLaren’s tips for using AI safely in legal research
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
The Chief Legal Officer to the Metropolitan Police, barrister Brett Welch, tells Anthony Inglese CB about his mission and the work to turn the Met around
Barrister apprenticeships – shortly to provide the fourth pathway to the Bar – are an ideal opportunity to support local talent and ‘grow your own’, say Tim Coulson and Dr Jane Dennehy
Oliver Lewis spotlights an overlooked yet rapidly evolving area of law – coercive and controlling behaviour within care contexts