*/
If you ever find yourself in Otterlo in the eastern Netherlands, then a visit to the Kröller-Müller Museum is a must. Set in one of the country’s largest national parks, the stylish museum and beautiful sculpture garden showcase the 19th and 20th century art collection of Helene Kröller-Muller, presented to the Dutch nation in 1938.
Part of that collection now provides a substantial chunk of the National Gallery’s first exhibition devoted to Neo-Impressionism, highlighting the revolutionary pointillist technique of an artistic movement which combined works reflecting end-of-the-century domestic, industrial and entertainment scenes, and coupled, for some of the artists, with a commitment to radical politics and social conscience.
The centrepiece of the show is Georges Seurat’s Le Chahut (a form of cancan dancing), seen for the first time in the UK. Full of exuberant, but geometric, upward thrusts of dancers, orchestra and light sources, and celebrating the entertainment of Paris nightlife and popular culture, there is also something of a sense of alienation and coldness about the painting – and the decidedly creepy image of a man in a hat looking up from the corner at the high kicking dancers. A reflection of modern life indeed. The work dominated attention when first exhibited and, like anything new, it became a prime target for critics. But this painting and the others in this exhibition, with greater emphasis on colour, light and lines, rather than subject matter, helped push the world towards ‘modern art’.
Works by Camille Pissarro, an early adopter who saw the movement as a ‘new phase in the logical march of Impressionism’, and Vincent van Gogh provide valuable context, showing how established artists engaged with Neo-Impressionist principles.
Neo-Impressionists are not always linked with the gritty socialism shown by earlier painters in the 19th century (the National had a small showing of rural painting by Jean-Francois Millet from the 1850s on at the same time). But some of these artists were not simply experimenting with the optical effects of pointillism, they were also reflecting the tough lives of many in the new industrial age. There was a link with anarchist and socialist causes, and a belief that their systematic, scientific approach to painting could contribute to a more rational and equitable society. Paul Signac, Henri-Edmond Cross, Anna Boch and Jan Toorop all feature. Toorop’s two canvasses Evening (before the Strike) and Morning (after the Strike) luminously depict the anguish and exhaustion of a family worn down by hard labour and strife.
This exhibition demonstrates why Neo-Impressionism matters. It did not portend the end of painting, as some critics claimed, by removing proper brushwork from canvasses and replacing it with a scientific technique of dots. Rather, as one contemporary fan observed, the objective application of colour theory freed these artists to take bold strides in the evolution of art, while preserving radicalism and relevance, and producing work of striking beauty and perspicuity.
If you ever find yourself in Otterlo in the eastern Netherlands, then a visit to the Kröller-Müller Museum is a must. Set in one of the country’s largest national parks, the stylish museum and beautiful sculpture garden showcase the 19th and 20th century art collection of Helene Kröller-Muller, presented to the Dutch nation in 1938.
Part of that collection now provides a substantial chunk of the National Gallery’s first exhibition devoted to Neo-Impressionism, highlighting the revolutionary pointillist technique of an artistic movement which combined works reflecting end-of-the-century domestic, industrial and entertainment scenes, and coupled, for some of the artists, with a commitment to radical politics and social conscience.
The centrepiece of the show is Georges Seurat’s Le Chahut (a form of cancan dancing), seen for the first time in the UK. Full of exuberant, but geometric, upward thrusts of dancers, orchestra and light sources, and celebrating the entertainment of Paris nightlife and popular culture, there is also something of a sense of alienation and coldness about the painting – and the decidedly creepy image of a man in a hat looking up from the corner at the high kicking dancers. A reflection of modern life indeed. The work dominated attention when first exhibited and, like anything new, it became a prime target for critics. But this painting and the others in this exhibition, with greater emphasis on colour, light and lines, rather than subject matter, helped push the world towards ‘modern art’.
Works by Camille Pissarro, an early adopter who saw the movement as a ‘new phase in the logical march of Impressionism’, and Vincent van Gogh provide valuable context, showing how established artists engaged with Neo-Impressionist principles.
Neo-Impressionists are not always linked with the gritty socialism shown by earlier painters in the 19th century (the National had a small showing of rural painting by Jean-Francois Millet from the 1850s on at the same time). But some of these artists were not simply experimenting with the optical effects of pointillism, they were also reflecting the tough lives of many in the new industrial age. There was a link with anarchist and socialist causes, and a belief that their systematic, scientific approach to painting could contribute to a more rational and equitable society. Paul Signac, Henri-Edmond Cross, Anna Boch and Jan Toorop all feature. Toorop’s two canvasses Evening (before the Strike) and Morning (after the Strike) luminously depict the anguish and exhaustion of a family worn down by hard labour and strife.
This exhibition demonstrates why Neo-Impressionism matters. It did not portend the end of painting, as some critics claimed, by removing proper brushwork from canvasses and replacing it with a scientific technique of dots. Rather, as one contemporary fan observed, the objective application of colour theory freed these artists to take bold strides in the evolution of art, while preserving radicalism and relevance, and producing work of striking beauty and perspicuity.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Jemima Coleman and Zoë Leventhal KC on the evolving global movement seeking to reframe how we view nature: to recognise that nature possesses inherent rights and to enshrine these rights in law
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
