*/
Women made up almost half of those recommended for appointment to the Bench last year, but fewer than 10% came from an ethnic minority background, statistics from the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) revealed.
Of the 308 recommendations made between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2016, 140 (45%) were women and only 28 (9%) declared themselves to be from an ethnic minority, while nine (3%) said they had a disability.
Of the of 21 recommendations made for senior posts – above the level of the High Court – only four (19%) were women.
Looking at the recommendations for Recorders – the first rung on the ladder to a full-time judicial career – the Bar Council calculated that white applicants were three times more likely to succeed than candidates from a minority ethnic group.
Sam Mercer, head of equality and diversity at the Bar Council, said: ‘At every stage of the process, BAME [black and minority ethnic] applicants did less well than their white colleagues.
‘If you are a white lawyer applying to become a Recorder you have a one in 10 chance of success. If you belong to a minority ethnic group, that drops to one in 33.’
Mercer said: ‘This inequality is unacceptable. We urgently need to work in partnership with organisations across the legal sector, and with government, to find out why this distortion is occurring and take immediate measures for correction.’
She added: ‘Those appointed as Recorders make up the pool from which the ranks of the senior judiciary are drawn. Lack of diversity at this level has huge implications for the ethnic make-up of our most influential and respected tier of public servants.’
Mercer also noted that since 2012, there have been no BAME applications or appointments at all to the Court of Appeal and there are still no BAME judges in the Supreme Court.
The JAC statistics revealed that the equal merit provision, which has been available for all exercises since July 2015, was used in 14 instances during the reporting period.
The provision means that, in a selection exercise where there are two or more candidates of equal merit, a candidate may be selected for a post for the purpose of increasing judicial diversity.
Women made up almost half of those recommended for appointment to the Bench last year, but fewer than 10% came from an ethnic minority background, statistics from the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) revealed.
Of the 308 recommendations made between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2016, 140 (45%) were women and only 28 (9%) declared themselves to be from an ethnic minority, while nine (3%) said they had a disability.
Of the of 21 recommendations made for senior posts – above the level of the High Court – only four (19%) were women.
Looking at the recommendations for Recorders – the first rung on the ladder to a full-time judicial career – the Bar Council calculated that white applicants were three times more likely to succeed than candidates from a minority ethnic group.
Sam Mercer, head of equality and diversity at the Bar Council, said: ‘At every stage of the process, BAME [black and minority ethnic] applicants did less well than their white colleagues.
‘If you are a white lawyer applying to become a Recorder you have a one in 10 chance of success. If you belong to a minority ethnic group, that drops to one in 33.’
Mercer said: ‘This inequality is unacceptable. We urgently need to work in partnership with organisations across the legal sector, and with government, to find out why this distortion is occurring and take immediate measures for correction.’
She added: ‘Those appointed as Recorders make up the pool from which the ranks of the senior judiciary are drawn. Lack of diversity at this level has huge implications for the ethnic make-up of our most influential and respected tier of public servants.’
Mercer also noted that since 2012, there have been no BAME applications or appointments at all to the Court of Appeal and there are still no BAME judges in the Supreme Court.
The JAC statistics revealed that the equal merit provision, which has been available for all exercises since July 2015, was used in 14 instances during the reporting period.
The provision means that, in a selection exercise where there are two or more candidates of equal merit, a candidate may be selected for a post for the purpose of increasing judicial diversity.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Jemima Coleman and Zoë Leventhal KC on the evolving global movement seeking to reframe how we view nature: to recognise that nature possesses inherent rights and to enshrine these rights in law
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
