*/
Government amendments to the Investigatory Powers Bill do not go far enough to maintain the client’s right to privilege, the Bar Council warned.
Following the final reading of the controversial Bill, the Bar Council said that the ‘client’s right to legal privilege looks permanently to be compromised’, though not as severely as was first feared.
Bar Chairman, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, acknowledged that the government had listened to its concerns and made changes to the original provisions to provide ‘some protection’ that is now on the face of the Bill.
But she said: ‘There is still too much scope for a client’s privileged communications deliberately to be targeted and intercepted, and we remain concerned that this fundamental constitutional right has now been diminished.’
The Law Society welcomed the changes, which it said boosted protection for client legal privilege, particularly by giving greater protection to legally privileged material accidentally caught in a legitimate search, and ensuring its retention is subject to a public interest test.
Law Society President, Robert Bourns, said: ‘While these protections are not as comprehensive as the legal community felt was appropriate, the government’s response is still a significant improvement from where the Bill started.’
He added: ‘With the number of moves to weaken the protection of legal professional privilege we have seen this year – both inadvertent and deliberate – the Law Society will remain vigilant to ensure that this core principle of our justice system is maintained.’
The Bar Council said it will continue to work with other legal professional bodies to press for proper protection of privileged communications.
Government amendments to the Investigatory Powers Bill do not go far enough to maintain the client’s right to privilege, the Bar Council warned.
Following the final reading of the controversial Bill, the Bar Council said that the ‘client’s right to legal privilege looks permanently to be compromised’, though not as severely as was first feared.
Bar Chairman, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, acknowledged that the government had listened to its concerns and made changes to the original provisions to provide ‘some protection’ that is now on the face of the Bill.
But she said: ‘There is still too much scope for a client’s privileged communications deliberately to be targeted and intercepted, and we remain concerned that this fundamental constitutional right has now been diminished.’
The Law Society welcomed the changes, which it said boosted protection for client legal privilege, particularly by giving greater protection to legally privileged material accidentally caught in a legitimate search, and ensuring its retention is subject to a public interest test.
Law Society President, Robert Bourns, said: ‘While these protections are not as comprehensive as the legal community felt was appropriate, the government’s response is still a significant improvement from where the Bill started.’
He added: ‘With the number of moves to weaken the protection of legal professional privilege we have seen this year – both inadvertent and deliberate – the Law Society will remain vigilant to ensure that this core principle of our justice system is maintained.’
The Bar Council said it will continue to work with other legal professional bodies to press for proper protection of privileged communications.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Jemima Coleman and Zoë Leventhal KC on the evolving global movement seeking to reframe how we view nature: to recognise that nature possesses inherent rights and to enshrine these rights in law
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
