*/
Government amendments to the Investigatory Powers Bill do not go far enough to maintain the client’s right to privilege, the Bar Council warned.
Following the final reading of the controversial Bill, the Bar Council said that the ‘client’s right to legal privilege looks permanently to be compromised’, though not as severely as was first feared.
Bar Chairman, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, acknowledged that the government had listened to its concerns and made changes to the original provisions to provide ‘some protection’ that is now on the face of the Bill.
But she said: ‘There is still too much scope for a client’s privileged communications deliberately to be targeted and intercepted, and we remain concerned that this fundamental constitutional right has now been diminished.’
The Law Society welcomed the changes, which it said boosted protection for client legal privilege, particularly by giving greater protection to legally privileged material accidentally caught in a legitimate search, and ensuring its retention is subject to a public interest test.
Law Society President, Robert Bourns, said: ‘While these protections are not as comprehensive as the legal community felt was appropriate, the government’s response is still a significant improvement from where the Bill started.’
He added: ‘With the number of moves to weaken the protection of legal professional privilege we have seen this year – both inadvertent and deliberate – the Law Society will remain vigilant to ensure that this core principle of our justice system is maintained.’
The Bar Council said it will continue to work with other legal professional bodies to press for proper protection of privileged communications.
Government amendments to the Investigatory Powers Bill do not go far enough to maintain the client’s right to privilege, the Bar Council warned.
Following the final reading of the controversial Bill, the Bar Council said that the ‘client’s right to legal privilege looks permanently to be compromised’, though not as severely as was first feared.
Bar Chairman, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, acknowledged that the government had listened to its concerns and made changes to the original provisions to provide ‘some protection’ that is now on the face of the Bill.
But she said: ‘There is still too much scope for a client’s privileged communications deliberately to be targeted and intercepted, and we remain concerned that this fundamental constitutional right has now been diminished.’
The Law Society welcomed the changes, which it said boosted protection for client legal privilege, particularly by giving greater protection to legally privileged material accidentally caught in a legitimate search, and ensuring its retention is subject to a public interest test.
Law Society President, Robert Bourns, said: ‘While these protections are not as comprehensive as the legal community felt was appropriate, the government’s response is still a significant improvement from where the Bill started.’
He added: ‘With the number of moves to weaken the protection of legal professional privilege we have seen this year – both inadvertent and deliberate – the Law Society will remain vigilant to ensure that this core principle of our justice system is maintained.’
The Bar Council said it will continue to work with other legal professional bodies to press for proper protection of privileged communications.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
By Kem Kemal, CEO, Henry Dannell
By BSK Financial Planning
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs
Susie Griffin on the admin that keeps barristers from billable work
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Kick off your career at the Bar Council’s Pupillage Fair this October – it’s one of the most valuable opportunities for aspiring barristers, says Amelia Clegg
The golden age of advocacy? David Langwallner pays homage to the filmic if contentious barrister Sir Edward Carson and some of his contemporaries
Henry Fingerhut outlines what the Bar Standards Board AI guidance means for early career barristers
The Ministry of Justice will match-fund up to 100 criminal pupillages, with grants available to criminal chambers across England and Wales. Similar to the COIC scheme, the grants will match-fund pupillages additional to those otherwise offered without government funding
Not yet, says Jacob Turner. Regulation, unlike the technology itself, is a domain the legal profession can still control
