*/
There are plenty of online resources detailing the work experience that will best bolster your pupillage applications. This article is not intended to be one of them. Instead, I offer some simple guidance on what to do, first, once you have found a role and, second, when discussing that experience in applications.
In an ideal world, you would find a role as closely connected to the work of the Bar as possible. Unfortunately, that is not easy – I certainly remember being grateful for any opportunity that might prove even remotely helpful for pupillage applications. Thus, you might want to also consider how to maximise the role you have landed. That requires you to think about the core skills of a barrister (and ideally a barrister in your desired practice area) and how you might develop those skills in your role.
How you do that will vary depending on your job. If you are a paralegal, you might volunteer to conduct work on a particular case, or express interest in certain work should it come in. If you are volunteering with pro bono schemes, choose the schemes and (to the extent you can) the cases most relevant to your intended practice area. If you are in a non-legal role, you might look for opportunities to work in a more client-facing position, particularly if you want to practise in an area of law where your clients are likely to be individuals (e.g. criminal or family).
This will likely require you to be candid with your employer about the sort of work you want to do. Many managers will be open to such conversations. Even if there is not an opportunity at present, they will know to keep you in mind should one arise.
Regardless of whether you have managed to ‘guide’ your work in such a way, do not just list your experience on your pupillage application form. Sell it. Tell chambers exactly what you did and how that demonstrates the skills needed at the Bar. In this regard, no experience is bad experience, and almost all will have given you some relevant skills.
For legal experience, emphasise the tasks most relevant to your intended practice area. But in general, most legal experience will be good and help in other practice areas. Research, drafting, advocacy etc are all common across the Bar.
For non-legal experience, emphasise the soft skills developed, but note you might also find more Bar-specific skills here. For example, I noted in my applications that volunteering with my university’s outreach programmes developed my advocacy because I offered talks on university and student finance to groups of students. As another example, if you’ve worked in an office role, you likely will have developed your written advocacy in some capacity. Whether you have worked on external presentations, produced marketing material, or simply emailed people of varying seniority, you will have developed your ability to adapt your communication according to who you are seeking to inform or persuade. As a caveat, though, don’t exaggerate; yes, you learned how to effectively communicate with a range of people, but no, that probably did not mean you convinced the CEO to change investment strategy.
If you ask, someone else might be able to point out parts of your role that demonstrate relevant skills but that have become so much a part of your routine that you do not realise. Ultimately, you need to think creatively about how best to market your experience to chambers. That, in itself, is a form of advocacy.
There are plenty of online resources detailing the work experience that will best bolster your pupillage applications. This article is not intended to be one of them. Instead, I offer some simple guidance on what to do, first, once you have found a role and, second, when discussing that experience in applications.
In an ideal world, you would find a role as closely connected to the work of the Bar as possible. Unfortunately, that is not easy – I certainly remember being grateful for any opportunity that might prove even remotely helpful for pupillage applications. Thus, you might want to also consider how to maximise the role you have landed. That requires you to think about the core skills of a barrister (and ideally a barrister in your desired practice area) and how you might develop those skills in your role.
How you do that will vary depending on your job. If you are a paralegal, you might volunteer to conduct work on a particular case, or express interest in certain work should it come in. If you are volunteering with pro bono schemes, choose the schemes and (to the extent you can) the cases most relevant to your intended practice area. If you are in a non-legal role, you might look for opportunities to work in a more client-facing position, particularly if you want to practise in an area of law where your clients are likely to be individuals (e.g. criminal or family).
This will likely require you to be candid with your employer about the sort of work you want to do. Many managers will be open to such conversations. Even if there is not an opportunity at present, they will know to keep you in mind should one arise.
Regardless of whether you have managed to ‘guide’ your work in such a way, do not just list your experience on your pupillage application form. Sell it. Tell chambers exactly what you did and how that demonstrates the skills needed at the Bar. In this regard, no experience is bad experience, and almost all will have given you some relevant skills.
For legal experience, emphasise the tasks most relevant to your intended practice area. But in general, most legal experience will be good and help in other practice areas. Research, drafting, advocacy etc are all common across the Bar.
For non-legal experience, emphasise the soft skills developed, but note you might also find more Bar-specific skills here. For example, I noted in my applications that volunteering with my university’s outreach programmes developed my advocacy because I offered talks on university and student finance to groups of students. As another example, if you’ve worked in an office role, you likely will have developed your written advocacy in some capacity. Whether you have worked on external presentations, produced marketing material, or simply emailed people of varying seniority, you will have developed your ability to adapt your communication according to who you are seeking to inform or persuade. As a caveat, though, don’t exaggerate; yes, you learned how to effectively communicate with a range of people, but no, that probably did not mean you convinced the CEO to change investment strategy.
If you ask, someone else might be able to point out parts of your role that demonstrate relevant skills but that have become so much a part of your routine that you do not realise. Ultimately, you need to think creatively about how best to market your experience to chambers. That, in itself, is a form of advocacy.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC