*/
The Legal Services Board (LSB) has unveiled its vision for the next five years.
In its Draft Business Plan 2009/10, the LSB sets out how it intends to deliver the changes required by the Legal Services Act 2007.
Goals include more help for those whose incomes exceed legal aid thresholds but are unable to afford legal services; greater competition in service delivery; “swift and effective redress” for consumers if things go wrong; greater diversity in the professions; and certainty and confidence in the regulatory structures underpinning the market.
Announcing the business plan, David Edmonds, LSB Chair, said he wanted “to make the market work better. This is not a distraction from more fundamental debates about the rule of the law and confidence in the legal system: it is an indispensable part of building that confidence for the individual citizen.” Edmonds noted that the budget for implementation of the LSB and its business plan had increased by £0.8m to £4.9m, but that this was “with good reason” and reflected the “wider scale of the Board’s ambition”.
Desmond Browne QC, Bar Council Chair, said: “We shall study the business plan with interest; we look forward to continuing to build a constructive and purposeful relationship with the LSB.”
A Bar Standards Board spokesperson said it was “particularly interested and pleased to see the LSB place an emphasis on working closely with partners in pursuit of a modern legal services market in which quality, access to justice, value for money and the interests of all consumers are the focus”. The Board had worked closely with the LSB and would continue to do so, they said.
The LSB, which launched in January, oversees nine separate legal services regulators including the Bar Council and Law Society, and the Office for Legal Complaints. Comments must be sent to the LSB by 13 March 2009.
In its Draft Business Plan 2009/10, the LSB sets out how it intends to deliver the changes required by the Legal Services Act 2007.
Goals include more help for those whose incomes exceed legal aid thresholds but are unable to afford legal services; greater competition in service delivery; “swift and effective redress” for consumers if things go wrong; greater diversity in the professions; and certainty and confidence in the regulatory structures underpinning the market.
Announcing the business plan, David Edmonds, LSB Chair, said he wanted “to make the market work better. This is not a distraction from more fundamental debates about the rule of the law and confidence in the legal system: it is an indispensable part of building that confidence for the individual citizen.” Edmonds noted that the budget for implementation of the LSB and its business plan had increased by £0.8m to £4.9m, but that this was “with good reason” and reflected the “wider scale of the Board’s ambition”.
Desmond Browne QC, Bar Council Chair, said: “We shall study the business plan with interest; we look forward to continuing to build a constructive and purposeful relationship with the LSB.”
A Bar Standards Board spokesperson said it was “particularly interested and pleased to see the LSB place an emphasis on working closely with partners in pursuit of a modern legal services market in which quality, access to justice, value for money and the interests of all consumers are the focus”. The Board had worked closely with the LSB and would continue to do so, they said.
The LSB, which launched in January, oversees nine separate legal services regulators including the Bar Council and Law Society, and the Office for Legal Complaints. Comments must be sent to the LSB by 13 March 2009.
The Legal Services Board (LSB) has unveiled its vision for the next five years.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
AlphaBiolabs has been awarded the contract to provide drug, alcohol, and DNA testing services for Hull City Council, following a rigorous competitive tender process
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
At least not that way, says Richard Paige
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
