*/
Author: Charlotte Proudman
Reviewer: Stephanie Hayward
Orion Publishing | May 2025 | ISBN 978-1399612449 | 352 pages | Hardcover
He Said, She Said unveils the misogyny embedded in Family Court. It arms every reader with essential knowledge to avoid the pitfalls which leave many women wanting justice.
The book journeys from the events sparking Charlotte Proudman’s decision to spotlight sexism in the law. From then on, we navigate the appeals and groundbreaking victories challenging the minimisation of rape and abuse – to the case charging Dr Proudman with misconduct for doing just that: critiquing a domestic abuse judgment.
Vindication against the Bar Standards Board in December 2024 underlines some salient themes. Progress ebbs and flows; there is an implication that individuals must suffer to achieve change; and in a case involving ‘he said, she said’, it is women who are discredited.
He Said, She Said is at its best when dismantling easy-to-believe narratives. In chapter 2, we meet Denise whose ex-partner exploits her frail mental health to suggest she is an unfit parent. Deeper excavation of the facts reveal she has been gaslit into questioning her sanity. And then there’s Mary, deemed too intelligent to withstand the abuse she alleges; too intelligent to forget the date she was raped. If the focus of these cases is dubious decision-making by judges, equal attention is paid to the judges who get it right – noted for their acuity into the complexity of abuse.
In fact, the whole purpose of the book is to open readers’ eyes to murkier truths; those eclipsed by simple, sexist explanations. Chapter 6 introduces the ‘parental alienation’ thesis, a creeping pseudoscience peddled by shady experts blaming mothers for turning children against their fathers. Parental alienation undermines allegations of abuse and reverses victim/offender roles. When Claudia is found to have alienated her children from their father and they are ordered to live with him, we discover how a mother accused of alienation – faced with the prospect of losing her children – may make increasingly bad decisions in a cruel, self-fulfilling prophecy.
Each case is as instructive as it is human. Each woman’s story is emotively relayed against a backdrop of appeals and fact-findings. If all this sounds procedural, elegant prose suffused with imagery absorbs the reader throughout. Chapters peel into the next, reflecting the churn of cases and children needing protection – and a reminder that for every stride to better reflect women’s lives, another piece of law fails to keep up.
On that point, the confines of the Hague Convention are exposed in child abduction cases. The Treaty’s strict grounds overlook women fleeing domestic abuse. And in Family Court, no definition of rape exists. How do you prove rape when no-one’s working to the same, objective standard? The book charts legislative success, too, notably, Dr Proudman’s work on Female Genital Mutilation Protection Orders, as well as amendments to the Domestic Abuse Act 2021.
Lighter moments come when the book leans into humour. The ‘Bernard Manning routine’ satirises blowback to LinkedIn-gate in 2015, and fond recollections of an adolescence in Leek are particularly enjoyable.
He Said, She Said might add to a growing body of literature exposing injustice against women – but this is a singular, skilfully crafted piece of work representing, so far, the author’s pioneering career placing women’s rights front and centre.
Stephanie Hayward is a criminal barrister and RASSO prosecutor at Deka Chambers. She leads Behind the Gown – an organisation spotlighting gender inequality and abuse of power at the Bar. In 2019, Stephanie wrote, produced, and presented a film to mark the centenary of women in law. Stephanie has recorded interviews and podcasts with notable figures including award winning playwright, Suzie Miller (Prima Facie), Jess Phillips MP and Joshua Rozenberg KC (hon).
Orion Publishing | May 2025 | ISBN 978-1399612449 | 352 pages | Hardcover
He Said, She Said unveils the misogyny embedded in Family Court. It arms every reader with essential knowledge to avoid the pitfalls which leave many women wanting justice.
The book journeys from the events sparking Charlotte Proudman’s decision to spotlight sexism in the law. From then on, we navigate the appeals and groundbreaking victories challenging the minimisation of rape and abuse – to the case charging Dr Proudman with misconduct for doing just that: critiquing a domestic abuse judgment.
Vindication against the Bar Standards Board in December 2024 underlines some salient themes. Progress ebbs and flows; there is an implication that individuals must suffer to achieve change; and in a case involving ‘he said, she said’, it is women who are discredited.
He Said, She Said is at its best when dismantling easy-to-believe narratives. In chapter 2, we meet Denise whose ex-partner exploits her frail mental health to suggest she is an unfit parent. Deeper excavation of the facts reveal she has been gaslit into questioning her sanity. And then there’s Mary, deemed too intelligent to withstand the abuse she alleges; too intelligent to forget the date she was raped. If the focus of these cases is dubious decision-making by judges, equal attention is paid to the judges who get it right – noted for their acuity into the complexity of abuse.
In fact, the whole purpose of the book is to open readers’ eyes to murkier truths; those eclipsed by simple, sexist explanations. Chapter 6 introduces the ‘parental alienation’ thesis, a creeping pseudoscience peddled by shady experts blaming mothers for turning children against their fathers. Parental alienation undermines allegations of abuse and reverses victim/offender roles. When Claudia is found to have alienated her children from their father and they are ordered to live with him, we discover how a mother accused of alienation – faced with the prospect of losing her children – may make increasingly bad decisions in a cruel, self-fulfilling prophecy.
Each case is as instructive as it is human. Each woman’s story is emotively relayed against a backdrop of appeals and fact-findings. If all this sounds procedural, elegant prose suffused with imagery absorbs the reader throughout. Chapters peel into the next, reflecting the churn of cases and children needing protection – and a reminder that for every stride to better reflect women’s lives, another piece of law fails to keep up.
On that point, the confines of the Hague Convention are exposed in child abduction cases. The Treaty’s strict grounds overlook women fleeing domestic abuse. And in Family Court, no definition of rape exists. How do you prove rape when no-one’s working to the same, objective standard? The book charts legislative success, too, notably, Dr Proudman’s work on Female Genital Mutilation Protection Orders, as well as amendments to the Domestic Abuse Act 2021.
Lighter moments come when the book leans into humour. The ‘Bernard Manning routine’ satirises blowback to LinkedIn-gate in 2015, and fond recollections of an adolescence in Leek are particularly enjoyable.
He Said, She Said might add to a growing body of literature exposing injustice against women – but this is a singular, skilfully crafted piece of work representing, so far, the author’s pioneering career placing women’s rights front and centre.
Author: Charlotte Proudman
Reviewer: Stephanie Hayward
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
