*/
The judgment reconfirms the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 2005/29/EC as a maximum harmonisation directive, holding that Member States may not adopt measures that are more restrictive, even in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection. http://curia.europa.eu/en/actu/communiques/cp09/aff/cp090031en.pdf
The judgment reconfirms the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 2005/29/EC as a maximum harmonisation directive, holding that Member States may not adopt measures that are more restrictive, even in order to ensure a higher level of consumer protection. http://curia.europa.eu/en/actu/communiques/cp09/aff/cp090031en.pdf
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal...
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Examined by Marie Law, Director of Toxicology...
Time is precious for barristers. Every moment...
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving...
Despite increased awareness, why are AI...
Many disabled barristers face entrenched...
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the...
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial...
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal...
.tmb-carlisting.png?sfvrsn=c60e2f3d_1){kind=logo}
