*/
Representatives of the Bar Human Rights Committee (BHRC) found serious flaws in legal procedure and child protection during the demolition of the ‘Jungle’ refugee camp in Calais.
The BHRC chairwoman, Kirsty Brimelow QC, and Jelia Sane, a barrister from Doughty Street Chambers, went to Calais as legal observers to monitor the situation after the French authorities began to disperse the estimated 10,000 residents of the camp.
Days after the clearance began, it was reported that at least 1,500 unaccompanied minors remained in Calais, many sleeping rough because the special container camp for the young or vulnerable was full.
The BHRC said the dispersal process was ‘unfair, opaque and an affront to human dignity’ and reported breaches of child rights law by the UK and French governments, who blamed each other for the delays.
Brimelow said: ‘It was entirely predictable that demolishing the camp prior to accommodating the children within it would lead to children sleeping rough in cold conditions, vulnerable to further abuse and exploitation.’
She said the system was hampered by a lack of information given to those in the camp and ‘fundamental disregard for due process of appeals’ compounded by the refusal to allow lawyers to enter and provide advice.
The BHRC will publish a full report on the situation shortly.
Representatives of the Bar Human Rights Committee (BHRC) found serious flaws in legal procedure and child protection during the demolition of the ‘Jungle’ refugee camp in Calais.
The BHRC chairwoman, Kirsty Brimelow QC, and Jelia Sane, a barrister from Doughty Street Chambers, went to Calais as legal observers to monitor the situation after the French authorities began to disperse the estimated 10,000 residents of the camp.
Days after the clearance began, it was reported that at least 1,500 unaccompanied minors remained in Calais, many sleeping rough because the special container camp for the young or vulnerable was full.
The BHRC said the dispersal process was ‘unfair, opaque and an affront to human dignity’ and reported breaches of child rights law by the UK and French governments, who blamed each other for the delays.
Brimelow said: ‘It was entirely predictable that demolishing the camp prior to accommodating the children within it would lead to children sleeping rough in cold conditions, vulnerable to further abuse and exploitation.’
She said the system was hampered by a lack of information given to those in the camp and ‘fundamental disregard for due process of appeals’ compounded by the refusal to allow lawyers to enter and provide advice.
The BHRC will publish a full report on the situation shortly.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
Why were some Caribbean nations given such dramatically different constitutional frameworks when they gained independence from the UK? Dr Leonardo Raznovich examines the controversial savings clause
