*/
THE Bar Council has welcomed the Ministry of Justice’s decision to create a new executive agency to replace the Legal Services Commission (LSC) to administer legal aid. The Government’s announcement follows the publication of the Review of Legal Aid Delivery and Governance by Sir Ian Magee, which had been commissioned by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), and a highly critical report of the Public Accounts Committee published in February (9th Report, HC 322) which accepted the findings of a review of the procurement of criminal legal aid by the National Audit Office in 2009.
Commenting on the Government’s decision, Chairman of the Bar, Nicholas Green QC said:
‘We welcome the publication of Sir Ian Magee’s report and the decision to move the Legal Services Commission to executive agency status in order to focus on the delivery of legal aid. Sir Ian’s report is thoughtful and well argued. As Sir Ian recognises, there has been a lack of clarity about who is calling the shots over policy. He identifies a number of serious issues which we will need to consider further. The case for separating the roles of administration of the legal aid funds from policy formulation, and clarifying the relationship between the MoJ and the LSC in organisational and governance terms, is a strong one which will undoubtedly help to rebuild more constructive relationships with the supplier base and stakeholders.
At a time of enormous pressure on public expenditure, it is essential that the LSC focuses on effective delivery of legal aidwhich demonstrates value for money to the taxpayer but also at the same time ensures access to justice for those who need it most. We shall look forward to beginning early discussions with MoJ officials to explore how the Bar could help the Ministry take forward the Magee recommendations for change. We shall also look forward to working with Carolyn Downs as interim Chief Executive of the Legal Services Commission.’
Commenting on the Government’s decision, Chairman of the Bar, Nicholas Green QC said:
‘We welcome the publication of Sir Ian Magee’s report and the decision to move the Legal Services Commission to executive agency status in order to focus on the delivery of legal aid. Sir Ian’s report is thoughtful and well argued. As Sir Ian recognises, there has been a lack of clarity about who is calling the shots over policy. He identifies a number of serious issues which we will need to consider further. The case for separating the roles of administration of the legal aid funds from policy formulation, and clarifying the relationship between the MoJ and the LSC in organisational and governance terms, is a strong one which will undoubtedly help to rebuild more constructive relationships with the supplier base and stakeholders.
At a time of enormous pressure on public expenditure, it is essential that the LSC focuses on effective delivery of legal aidwhich demonstrates value for money to the taxpayer but also at the same time ensures access to justice for those who need it most. We shall look forward to beginning early discussions with MoJ officials to explore how the Bar could help the Ministry take forward the Magee recommendations for change. We shall also look forward to working with Carolyn Downs as interim Chief Executive of the Legal Services Commission.’
THE Bar Council has welcomed the Ministry of Justice’s decision to create a new executive agency to replace the Legal Services Commission (LSC) to administer legal aid. The Government’s announcement follows the publication of the Review of Legal Aid Delivery and Governance by Sir Ian Magee, which had been commissioned by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), and a highly critical report of the Public Accounts Committee published in February (9th Report, HC 322) which accepted the findings of a review of the procurement of criminal legal aid by the National Audit Office in 2009.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
