*/
Proceeds of crime – Practice. The Administrative Court dismissed the applicants' application to set aside a property freezing order (PFO) and a disclosure order (DO) made against them, pursuant to ss 245A and 357 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. There had been no need to provide further information to the judge, and nothing unsettled the judge's conclusions that good arguable grounds for the grant of a PFO and reasonable grounds to suspect that property was recoverable or associated for the DO had been established.
Proceeds of crime – Practice. The Administrative Court dismissed the applicants' application to set aside a property freezing order (PFO) and a disclosure order (DO) made against them, pursuant to ss 245A and 357 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. There had been no need to provide further information to the judge, and nothing unsettled the judge's conclusions that good arguable grounds for the grant of a PFO and reasonable grounds to suspect that property was recoverable or associated for the DO had been established.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
