Latest Cases

Civil procedure – Assignation – Purported assignation of damages claim. Sheriff Court: In an action in which the pursuer claimed to be the assignee of a company's claim for damages against the defender, who was the arbiter in arbitration proceedings involving the company and another company, the party minuter, the court held that the pursuer had no title to pursue the company's rights and, accordingly, he had no title to sue in the proceedings, the action was incompetent, any right of action which the pursuer might have had to claim damages had now been extinguished by prescription, and the action as a whole was irrelevant. 

European Union – Common foreign and security policy. The Court of Justice of the European Union, Fifth Chamber, dismissed the Council of the European Union's appeal against the annulment of Council Decisions to include the applicant Iranian bank on a list of persons or entities regarded as being involved in nuclear proliferation in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413 and repealing and Implementing Regulation No 668/2010, and other Decisions, in so far as those acts concerned the applicant. 

European Union – Trade marks. The General Court of the European Union dismissed the action brought by Franmax UAB (Franmax) against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office concerning opposition proceedings between Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu and Franmax, regarding the application by the latter for registration of a figurative sign 'Dino', depicting a dinosaur, as a European Union trade mark. 

Practice – Striking out. The Chancery Division dismissed the defendant banks' application to strike out parts of a claim arising from the extension of a loan facility to a company that managed business parks, which had entered administration. The court allowed in part an application by the claimants to amend the claim, in that it was necessary to refine the proposed amended pleading in order to refer solely to the named individuals who had been employed by the banks at the time of the alleged conspiracy, for whom it was vicariously liable. 

Firearms – Prohibited weapons. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, held that the Firearms Act 1982, of itself, had not created any offence. It had widened the scope of the Firearms Act 1968 so as to cover imitation firearms which were readily convertible into firearms to which s 1 of the 1968 Act applied. Accordingly, in the particular circumstances, the defendant's appeal against a conviction for possessing a prohibited firearm, contrary to s 5(1)(aba) of the 1968 Act, would be dismissed. 

Family proceedings – Orders in family proceedings. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the appellant local authority's appeal against an order designating it as the authority responsible for an eight-month-old baby, held that, given that the test for ordinary residence was one of fact and should not be made into an overly complicated exercise, there was no basis for concluding that the judge's decision was perverse. It had been reasoned and clear and, in all the circumstances, unassailable. 

Immigration – Leave to remain. The Administrative Court allowed the claimant's application for interim relief, namely, for an order that the defendant Secretary of State should grant or reinstate his indefinite leave to remain (ILR) in the United Kingdom pending the resolution of his claim for judicial review and anticipated appeal. The removal of the claimant's ILR had been an automatic consequence of the Secretary of State's erroneous decision to deport him. 

Elections – Local government. The Queen's Bench Division allowed the claimant's application for urgent interim relief to lift his suspension from holding office in, or representing the Labour Party. The suspension had gone on too long and there was a good arguable case that it had reached the point that the delay had amounted to unfairness, such that the balance of convenience and justice came down firmly in favour of the grant of relief. 

Companies – Shareholders – Unfair prejudice. Sheriff Court: In an unfair prejudice petition under s 994 of the Companies Act 2006, in which the petitioner moved the court to allow the petition to be amended and thereafter to grant warrant for diligence by arrestment on the dependence of the action under s 15A of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987, the court was satisfied that the petitioner's minute of amendment should be allowed and the petition amended in terms thereof, and that it was competent in principle to grant arrestment on the dependence in the action; however the petitioner's motion for warrant to arrest on the dependence was refused as she had failed to satisfy the court that the statutory grounds for granting the order sought had been made out. 

Personal Injury – Liability – Contributory negligence. Sheriff Court: In an action in which the pursuer sought damages in respect of injuries she sustained following a collision between the bicycle she was riding and the defender's dog, the court held that the primary cause of the collision was the defender's fault in failing to take appropriate steps to control his dog on a public road and thereby allowing it to run into the path of the pursuer's bicycle, however the pursuer, having failed to moderate her speed or to be aware of the potential presence of hazards around a blind bend, or to have given any warning of her impending approach, contributed to the loss, injury and damage she sustained as the direct result of the collision: liability would be apportioned as 70% to the defender and 30% to the pursuer.