Latest Cases

Patent – Petition for revocation. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the defendant's appeal against the judge's decision that its European patent for a dosage regimen for use of levonorgestrel as a method of emergency contraception was invalid for obviousness. It held that the defendant had sought to characterise the sort of information which a person skilled in the art would know he could look up as a 'species of or extension of … common general knowledge', but that was not correct. It would be taken into account for an obviousness assessment, not because it was in the notional head of the notional person, but because it would be obvious to such a person to look it up. 

Charity – Gift aid. The Chancery Decision granted the Charity Commission of England and Wales a declaration that interim managers of a charity (the Cup Trust) should be at liberty to discontinue an appeal against the Revenue and Customs Commissioners' rejection of its claims for Gift Aid on donations from certain taxpayers, in respect of a tax avoidance scheme. The Charities Act 2011 made it clear that interim managers had the functions that were defined by the order of the Charity Commission that appointed them, and they operated under the supervision of the Charity Commission and not the court. However, there would plainly be some situations in which the court did need to become involved and in the present case, the decision to discontinue was within the range of decisions to which rational charity trustees could properly have come. 

European Union – Trade marks. The General Court of the European Union dismissed the action brought by Compagnie Gervais Danone (Danone) against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office, relating to opposition proceedings between San Miguel, Fabricas de Cerveza y Malta, SA and Danone concerning the application by the latter for registration of a figurative sign 'B'lue' as a European Union trade mark. 

European Union – Trade marks. The General Court of the European Union dismissed the action brought by L'Oréal, SA against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office, relating to opposition proceedings between Theralab — Produtos Farmacêuticos e Nutracêuticos and L'Oréal, concerning the application by the latter for registration of a figurative sign 'VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA' as a European Union trade mark. 

Limitation of action – Accrual of cause of action. In the course of the Kenyan emergency group litigation, the Queen's Bench Division held that issues relating to the pre-1954 time bar, and ss 11, 14 and 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 were to be tried preliminarily. However, the application for the s 33 of the Act preliminary issue to be tried as a preliminary issue would be refused. 

Libel and slander – Identity. The Queen's Bench Division, in determining preliminary issues in a libel claim, held that the second claimant company had only satisfied the objective test of reference to a limited and unimportant extent. However, that limited reference could not satisfy its case on defamatory meaning, as the publication complained of had not conveyed any imputation defamatory of it. 

European Union – Trade marks. The General Court of the European Union dismissed the action brought by Niagara Bottling LLC (Niagara) against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office, concerning the international registration designating the European Union of the word mark 'NIAGARA', which Niagara sought to register as a European Union trade mark. The General Court upheld the Board's decision that the sign at issue was descriptive of the characteristics of the goods and services in respect of which registration was sought, within the meaning of art 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. 

Human rights – Freedom of expression. The Administrative Court dismissed the claimant professors' application for judicial review of the defendant university's decision to withdraw permission to hold a conference entitled 'International Law and the State of Israel: Legitimacy, Responsibility and Exceptionalism' on its campus on proposed dates. Given the risks of holding the conference, the decision had been a proportionate interference with the claimants' rights. 

Personal Injury: Quantum Case. Asbestos related disease. PSLA of £80,000 with total damages of £642,972.51. The claimant contracted mesothelioma as a result of exposure to asbestos during her course of employment and subsequently died following surgery. 

Extradition – Extradition order. The Divisional Court dismissed the appellants' appeals against the judge's decision, sending their cases to the Secretary of State, who ordered the appellants' extradition to Peru to face trial for drug trafficking. The assurances provided by Peru applied to the second appellant Italian national as to the first appellant British national, and the appellants' rights under arts 3 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights would not be breached.