Latest Cases

Town and country planning – Enforcement notice. The Administrative Court dismissed the appellants' appeal by way of case stated against the Crown Court's decision, dismissing their appeal against conviction for using their land as a builder's merchants with ancillary sales, in contravention of the terms of an enforcement notice. There had been sufficient evidence on which the Crown Court could reasonably conclude to the required standard that the land had been used as a builder's merchants with ancillary sales throughout the period alleged in the information. 

European Union – Companies. The Court of Justice of the European Union gave a preliminary ruling, deciding that European Union law should be interpreted as meaning that: – the law applicable following a cross-border merger by acquisition to the interpretation of a loan contract taken out by the acquired company, such as the contracts at issue in the main proceedings, to the performance of the obligations under the contract and to how those obligations were extinguished was the law which was applicable to the contract before the merger; – the provisions governing the protection of the creditors of the acquired company, in a case such as that at issue in the main proceedings, were those of national law which were applicable to that company. 

Negligence – Duty to take care. The county court dismissed the claimant's claim for damages for physical and emotional abuse caused by a licensee on parole after a murder conviction. The Secretary of State had not owed the claimant a duty of care to investigate the initial allegations that she had been in a relationship with the licensee in a different, more thorough, manner, nor had he owed a duty to warn the claimant of the licensee's background. 

Sentence – Mandatory life sentence. The Divisional Court dismissed the claimant's application for judicial review of the defendant Secretary of State's acceptance of the judge's determination that his tariff should not be reduced. Although a victim personal statement should not have been considered by the judge if its author had been unwilling to have it disclosed to the claimant, the judge's decision had been inevitable. 

European Union – Residence. The Court of Justice of the European Union gave a preliminary ruling, deciding that art 7(1)(c) of Council Directive (EC) 2003/86 should be interpreted as allowing the competent authorities of a member state to refuse an application for family reunification on the basis of a prospective assessment of the likelihood of the sponsor retaining, or failing to retain, the necessary stable and regular resources which were sufficient to maintain himself and the members of his family, without recourse to the social assistance system of that member state, in the year following the date of submission of that application, that assessment being based on the pattern of the sponsor's income in the six months preceding that date. 

European Union – Trade marks. The General Court of the European Union dismissed the action brought by Laboratorios Ern, SA against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office, relating to opposition proceedings concerning the application by the intervener, Matthias Werner, for registration of a figurative sign 'Dynamic Life' as a European Union trade mark. 

Costs – Order for costs. The Chancery Division, on the claimant's application for an order, under s 51(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981, that RG, who had been joined as a party to the present proceedings for the purposes of costs only, pay the costs of its claim against the first defendant, held that the present was an exceptional case and it was just to make an order for costs against RG. RG was ordered to pay the claimant's costs incurred from the date on which the first defendant had filed its acknowledgement of service. 

Practice – Disclosure. The Commercial Court, ruled, among other things that an unless order was the only way to render effective an earlier order for disclosure by the claimants in circumstances where there had been a previous failure to comply. The order was made in the course of proceedings alleging the breach of an oral agreement concerning the sale of assets. 

Practice – Summary judgment. The Chancery Division allowed in part the defendant News Group Newspapers' application to strike out parts of the particulars of claim of one of a number of defendants in phone-hacking proceedings, where two of the eight matters to which the application related could not demonstrate phone-hacking or other improper information-gathering. It allowed the claimants' application to amend generic particulars of claim and held that, among other things, the application to amend had not been made too late in the proceedings. 

Charity – Registration. The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) dismissed the appellant's appeal against the finding of a judge that the appellant lacked standing to appeal against a decision by the respondent Charity Commission not to remove certain charities from the Register of Charities. The court held that, among other things, the appellant could not be considered to be a person affected by the decision for the purposes of the Charities Act 2011.