*/
Many culturally Catholic men have grown up with arguments about whether, for example, Taxi Driver (1976) is as great a film as Goodfellas (1990) and whether Scorsese’s more recent films are too far away from his natural metier: the destructiveness of male gangster capitalism.
Killers of the Flower Moon (2023) is a film directly about racism, inequality and the native American community being dispossessed from within. It is based on real-life events – almost erased from history but meticulously documented in David Grann’s 2017 book of the same name – in the native American Osage community in 1920s Oklahoma.
Marginalised, dispossessed and confined to arid reservations in Oklahoma, the tribe’s fortunes changed overnight when, during one flower moon, oil gushed from their reservation. Suddenly the Osage people became the richest in the world per capita but use of their wealth overseen by White legal guardians as indigenous people were deemed ‘incompetent’ by the US government of the time.
The film documents the infiltration of the community and local genocide to effect property transfers. Osage people are systematically targeted and killed so a nefarious colonialist can acquire headrights to their land. Legal formalities masking infamy. Coercive preying on the vulnerable. Duress and non est factum. Commercial lawyers should usefully watch this film as Robert De Niro’s grasp of contract negotiation is most instructive.
De Niro, in his greatest psychotic performance because it is so controlled, represents the banality of evil. Posing as a friend and benefactor to the Osage people while plotting to steal their mineral rights, his sadistic use of punishment and rewards, especially towards his nephew for the building of mayhem and murder, is laced with the usual soupcon of family values. Leonardo DiCaprio is the fortune-hunting World War I veteran under his uncle’s sinister influence. He marries into the community, poisoning his oil-rich Osage wife’s insulin to create dependency issues.
Perhaps uniquely in Scorsese’s work, the film features a central all-defining female voice – played by Lily Gladstone to critical acclaim – with a kind of apologia of previous non-recognition of same by the director at the end of the film. Thus, Killers of the Flower Moon rages with injustice but also the female spirit, or Gaia, and the rejection of toxic masculinity – or at least, the rejection of profit over people.
And lawyers? Tom White (played by Jesse Plemons) investigates the murders as an agent of J Edgar Hoover’s Bureau of Investigation and the film culminates with the prosecution of all and sundry. John Lithgow is lead prosecutor Peter Leaward and Brendan Fraser is W S Hamilton, defence lawyer. In one notable scene, Ernest is shocked to learn that lawyers and judges exist who are not corrupt.
In a terrible twist, a 2021 Oklahoma state law (HB 1775) regulating classroom discussions on race and gender led to a high school cancelling lesson plans involving Grann’s book. And with the Trump administration moving to control Harvard’s teaching and enrolment practices by revoking visas of non-national students, there is so much for lawyers to think about in our increasingly tribalistic times.
Many culturally Catholic men have grown up with arguments about whether, for example, Taxi Driver (1976) is as great a film as Goodfellas (1990) and whether Scorsese’s more recent films are too far away from his natural metier: the destructiveness of male gangster capitalism.
Killers of the Flower Moon (2023) is a film directly about racism, inequality and the native American community being dispossessed from within. It is based on real-life events – almost erased from history but meticulously documented in David Grann’s 2017 book of the same name – in the native American Osage community in 1920s Oklahoma.
Marginalised, dispossessed and confined to arid reservations in Oklahoma, the tribe’s fortunes changed overnight when, during one flower moon, oil gushed from their reservation. Suddenly the Osage people became the richest in the world per capita but use of their wealth overseen by White legal guardians as indigenous people were deemed ‘incompetent’ by the US government of the time.
The film documents the infiltration of the community and local genocide to effect property transfers. Osage people are systematically targeted and killed so a nefarious colonialist can acquire headrights to their land. Legal formalities masking infamy. Coercive preying on the vulnerable. Duress and non est factum. Commercial lawyers should usefully watch this film as Robert De Niro’s grasp of contract negotiation is most instructive.
De Niro, in his greatest psychotic performance because it is so controlled, represents the banality of evil. Posing as a friend and benefactor to the Osage people while plotting to steal their mineral rights, his sadistic use of punishment and rewards, especially towards his nephew for the building of mayhem and murder, is laced with the usual soupcon of family values. Leonardo DiCaprio is the fortune-hunting World War I veteran under his uncle’s sinister influence. He marries into the community, poisoning his oil-rich Osage wife’s insulin to create dependency issues.
Perhaps uniquely in Scorsese’s work, the film features a central all-defining female voice – played by Lily Gladstone to critical acclaim – with a kind of apologia of previous non-recognition of same by the director at the end of the film. Thus, Killers of the Flower Moon rages with injustice but also the female spirit, or Gaia, and the rejection of toxic masculinity – or at least, the rejection of profit over people.
And lawyers? Tom White (played by Jesse Plemons) investigates the murders as an agent of J Edgar Hoover’s Bureau of Investigation and the film culminates with the prosecution of all and sundry. John Lithgow is lead prosecutor Peter Leaward and Brendan Fraser is W S Hamilton, defence lawyer. In one notable scene, Ernest is shocked to learn that lawyers and judges exist who are not corrupt.
In a terrible twist, a 2021 Oklahoma state law (HB 1775) regulating classroom discussions on race and gender led to a high school cancelling lesson plans involving Grann’s book. And with the Trump administration moving to control Harvard’s teaching and enrolment practices by revoking visas of non-national students, there is so much for lawyers to think about in our increasingly tribalistic times.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC