*/
In the first of a new King’s Counsel Selection Panel series, Monisha Shah looks at Competency D: Diversity Action & Understanding – and the many inspiring ways to demonstrate it
The 2025 competition for the appointment of King’s Counsel marks 20 years since its inception in 2005. This will be my eighth year on this panel, my fourth as Chair.
Competency D is an essential component of the competency framework. Following a period of reflection and discussion with the professional bodies, we expanded the title to ‘Diversity Action & Understanding’ to offer greater clarity on what is required under this competency.
The panel are concerned with two aspects of this competency. The first is evidence of an applicant’s understanding of diversity; the second and arguably more important aspect is evidence of the applicant’s commitment to the principle and practice of diversity through personal action.
There are many ways to demonstrate an understanding of diversity. These include being aware of the main diversity issues facing the profession; cultural, societal and other issues faced by practitioners and clients; understanding the needs of people from all backgrounds and how it might impact their ability to seek/receive legal redress.
However, simply being aware of these issues is not enough. The panel are looking for evidence that the applicant has an in-depth understanding of equality, diversity and inclusion issues and is also able to offer evidence that they are committed to the principle and practice of diversity through personal action. To that extent, the panel has expanded the applicable context so that applicants can offer evidence of making a positive, tangible difference not simply from their professional lives but from any aspect of their life more generally.
Clearly then, it is not enough to be able to recite statistics and reports. Equally, merely being a member of a committee in chambers or firms, with little evidence of what difference the applicant has personally made to the work of that committee, is unlikely to meet the threshold of excellence. This competency is also not about the personal characteristics of an applicant or promoting the appointment of any underrepresented groups. While lived experience is a powerful factor in an applicant’s understanding of diversity issues, it is not in itself sufficient evidence to satisfy the standard required under Competency D. Evidence of impactful personal action to widen access and participation is an essential measure of this competency.
The panel recognises that not all assessors are able to offer sufficient or detailed evidence under this competency. Those who know the applicant well – leaders, clients, peers – often do offer rich and varied examples of the actions of an applicant. Some, like judges who may have seen the applicant for shorter periods, may not have much useful evidence to give. That is not held against the applicant when the panel is making a decision about whether the applicant meets the threshold for interview.
The interview and the self-assessment in the application are the key forums to demonstrate Competency D. When applicants are considering how to demonstrate Diversity Action & Understanding, it is worth thinking about which experiences have shaped your understanding of diversity, has this understanding changed over time (and if so, how), what are the proactive steps that you have taken to widen access and participation, has your awareness of diversity issues prompted you to act in a way that you would otherwise not have done.
As a panel, we have heard many wonderful and inspiring examples from successful applicants of their proactive work to promote diversity and equality of opportunity. These have ranged from volunteering for charities in all walks of life – from mental health support to youth clubs, offering pro-bono advice and hours within the profession but also to charitable organisations, mentoring, coaching and establishing support networks, sharing work opportunities, confronting discrimination and prejudice, calling out unacceptable speech/behaviour, establishing new ways of working which makes a material difference to the work place, or to a vulnerable group or community. These examples are frequently accompanied by compelling, thoughtful narratives of what impact their actions have had and what the ongoing challenges might be in order to deliver lasting change.
It was the intent of the professional bodies who set up this framework that everyone should be able to demonstrate a high standard of understanding and commitment to diversity if they wish to achieve this highest award of excellence. The work of the panel is firmly rooted in this principle, while being flexible in our approach.
Our guidance to applicants and assessors is set out in full each year on the KCA website: kcappointments.org. The KCA secretariat are always happy to assist prospective applicants or assessors on any aspect of the silk process. Please do reach out and email: enquiries@kcappointments.org
The 2025 competition for the appointment of King’s Counsel marks 20 years since its inception in 2005. This will be my eighth year on this panel, my fourth as Chair.
Competency D is an essential component of the competency framework. Following a period of reflection and discussion with the professional bodies, we expanded the title to ‘Diversity Action & Understanding’ to offer greater clarity on what is required under this competency.
The panel are concerned with two aspects of this competency. The first is evidence of an applicant’s understanding of diversity; the second and arguably more important aspect is evidence of the applicant’s commitment to the principle and practice of diversity through personal action.
There are many ways to demonstrate an understanding of diversity. These include being aware of the main diversity issues facing the profession; cultural, societal and other issues faced by practitioners and clients; understanding the needs of people from all backgrounds and how it might impact their ability to seek/receive legal redress.
However, simply being aware of these issues is not enough. The panel are looking for evidence that the applicant has an in-depth understanding of equality, diversity and inclusion issues and is also able to offer evidence that they are committed to the principle and practice of diversity through personal action. To that extent, the panel has expanded the applicable context so that applicants can offer evidence of making a positive, tangible difference not simply from their professional lives but from any aspect of their life more generally.
Clearly then, it is not enough to be able to recite statistics and reports. Equally, merely being a member of a committee in chambers or firms, with little evidence of what difference the applicant has personally made to the work of that committee, is unlikely to meet the threshold of excellence. This competency is also not about the personal characteristics of an applicant or promoting the appointment of any underrepresented groups. While lived experience is a powerful factor in an applicant’s understanding of diversity issues, it is not in itself sufficient evidence to satisfy the standard required under Competency D. Evidence of impactful personal action to widen access and participation is an essential measure of this competency.
The panel recognises that not all assessors are able to offer sufficient or detailed evidence under this competency. Those who know the applicant well – leaders, clients, peers – often do offer rich and varied examples of the actions of an applicant. Some, like judges who may have seen the applicant for shorter periods, may not have much useful evidence to give. That is not held against the applicant when the panel is making a decision about whether the applicant meets the threshold for interview.
The interview and the self-assessment in the application are the key forums to demonstrate Competency D. When applicants are considering how to demonstrate Diversity Action & Understanding, it is worth thinking about which experiences have shaped your understanding of diversity, has this understanding changed over time (and if so, how), what are the proactive steps that you have taken to widen access and participation, has your awareness of diversity issues prompted you to act in a way that you would otherwise not have done.
As a panel, we have heard many wonderful and inspiring examples from successful applicants of their proactive work to promote diversity and equality of opportunity. These have ranged from volunteering for charities in all walks of life – from mental health support to youth clubs, offering pro-bono advice and hours within the profession but also to charitable organisations, mentoring, coaching and establishing support networks, sharing work opportunities, confronting discrimination and prejudice, calling out unacceptable speech/behaviour, establishing new ways of working which makes a material difference to the work place, or to a vulnerable group or community. These examples are frequently accompanied by compelling, thoughtful narratives of what impact their actions have had and what the ongoing challenges might be in order to deliver lasting change.
It was the intent of the professional bodies who set up this framework that everyone should be able to demonstrate a high standard of understanding and commitment to diversity if they wish to achieve this highest award of excellence. The work of the panel is firmly rooted in this principle, while being flexible in our approach.
Our guidance to applicants and assessors is set out in full each year on the KCA website: kcappointments.org. The KCA secretariat are always happy to assist prospective applicants or assessors on any aspect of the silk process. Please do reach out and email: enquiries@kcappointments.org
In the first of a new King’s Counsel Selection Panel series, Monisha Shah looks at Competency D: Diversity Action & Understanding – and the many inspiring ways to demonstrate it
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving Back donation to RAY Ceredigion, a grassroots West Wales charity that provides play, learning and community opportunities for families across Ceredigion County
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, outlines why barristers, solicitors, judges, social workers and local authorities across the UK trust AlphaBiolabs for court-admissible testing
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs is helping to support women and children affected by domestic abuse, thanks to the company’s unique charity initiative that empowers legal professionals to give back to community causes
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs discusses the benefits of Non-Invasive Prenatal Paternity testing for the Family Court
Philip N Bristow explains how to unlock your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step
Come in with your eyes open, but don’t let fear cloud the prospect. A view from practice by John Dove
Timothy James Dutton CBE KC was known across the profession as an outstanding advocate, a dedicated public servant and a man of the utmost integrity. He was also a loyal and loving friend to many of us
Lana Murphy and Francesca Perera started their careers at the Crown Prosecution Service before joining chambers. They discuss why they made the move and the practicalities of setting up self-employed practice as qualified juniors
As threats and attacks against lawyers continue to rise, a new international treaty offers a much-needed safeguard. Sarah Kavanagh reports on the landmark convention defending the independence of lawyers and rule of law
Author: Charlotte Proudman Reviewer: Stephanie Hayward