*/
I am now in my second month as Chair of the Bar. I was humbled by the response to my inaugural speech and thanks to all who attended. I am really pleased the speech has been widely read. The priorities set out for this year include raising the profile of the family Bar, enhancing the wellbeing of the profession, making further strides on equality, diversity and inclusion and continuing to press for the resources needed to restore the justice system. Many at the Bar are already engaged in this work, making suggestions and seeking to work with the Bar Council which is great. Young barristers have told me they feel energised and hopeful.
The appointment of 105 new KCs has just been announced. I would like to congratulate all who have been successful. I also want to offer my commiserations to those who have not had the success; it can often take multiple applications. Don’t give up and please take advantage of the mentoring and support available, including the scheme offered by the Bar Council.
I will work closely with the Bar Council’s Equality, Diversity and Social Mobility Committee, Race Panel and Employed Barristers’ Committee to better understand why fewer women are applying for silk and why none of the employed barristers and Black barristers who applied this year were successful.
At a time when there is much need for comprehensive reform in the justice system, I want to use my year in office to showcase how innovative solutions created for families could inform new thinking in other courts. Take, for example, the Family Drug and Alcohol Court. So far, this has been a success story and perhaps one that the criminal jurisdiction could draw from.
The pilot Pathfinder courts have also been a success. They use a child-centred and problem-solving approach to private law family proceedings to improve the court responses to risk and domestic abuse and enhance the voice of the child within proceedings. The Bar Council is now calling on the government to fund the rollout across England and Wales. To ensure the continued success of the Pathfinder, corners must not be cut. It is imperative that the resources, training and funding made available to the pilot courts are rolled out as well.
An effective and properly funded family court system should be front and centre to help to reach the government’s target of halving violence against women and girls (VAWG). We have put forward a package of measures including specialised domestic abuse and child abuse support, assessment services and trauma-informed measures in court buildings.
The Bar Council is urging the government to provide a clear definition of VAWG and recognise that VAWG is preventable so that policies extend beyond reactive measures to incorporate prevention and early intervention strategies. At the very least, every complainant and every alleged perpetrator should have access to legal advice and representation.
We are providing data and ideas to the Leveson Review alongside carefully considering all the options that can help bear down on the backlog. The Bar Council will continue to advocate for a comprehensive and sustainable approach to the criminal justice system which will create stability and which, at the very least, must include Crown Courts to be resourced to sit at the maximum capacity; the establishment of a new independent fee review body reporting annually (just like judges have); and additional fees for lawyers.
The justice system has been starved of funds to save money, but cuts have impacted on access to justice for children, families and vulnerable adults, as well as increasing overall public spending costs.
The Ministry of Justice (MOJ) has now launched a consultation on civil legal aid fees for housing and debt work, and immigration and asylum work. The MOJ is also seeking further evidence on potential changes to some aspects of contractual requirements.
As the first funding increase for civil legal aid since 1996, the Bar Council has welcomed the proposed additional £20 million per annum investment. However, it is long overdue and fees for other civil legal aid categories are still under consideration. We need to see the injection of new money and we will press for funding as part of the second phase of the spending review due this spring.
Please join us in Birmingham this year for Bar Conference on Saturday 7 June and I hope that when it comes to subscribing to the Bar Representation Fee (BRF), like me, you can see the value in what the Bar Council does. Please subscribe during the authorisation to practise process.
Barbara Mills KC is the 2025 Chair of the Bar. She is a specialist family practitioner at 4PB and former Co-Chair of the Bar Council’s Race Working Group.
I am now in my second month as Chair of the Bar. I was humbled by the response to my inaugural speech and thanks to all who attended. I am really pleased the speech has been widely read. The priorities set out for this year include raising the profile of the family Bar, enhancing the wellbeing of the profession, making further strides on equality, diversity and inclusion and continuing to press for the resources needed to restore the justice system. Many at the Bar are already engaged in this work, making suggestions and seeking to work with the Bar Council which is great. Young barristers have told me they feel energised and hopeful.
The appointment of 105 new KCs has just been announced. I would like to congratulate all who have been successful. I also want to offer my commiserations to those who have not had the success; it can often take multiple applications. Don’t give up and please take advantage of the mentoring and support available, including the scheme offered by the Bar Council.
I will work closely with the Bar Council’s Equality, Diversity and Social Mobility Committee, Race Panel and Employed Barristers’ Committee to better understand why fewer women are applying for silk and why none of the employed barristers and Black barristers who applied this year were successful.
At a time when there is much need for comprehensive reform in the justice system, I want to use my year in office to showcase how innovative solutions created for families could inform new thinking in other courts. Take, for example, the Family Drug and Alcohol Court. So far, this has been a success story and perhaps one that the criminal jurisdiction could draw from.
The pilot Pathfinder courts have also been a success. They use a child-centred and problem-solving approach to private law family proceedings to improve the court responses to risk and domestic abuse and enhance the voice of the child within proceedings. The Bar Council is now calling on the government to fund the rollout across England and Wales. To ensure the continued success of the Pathfinder, corners must not be cut. It is imperative that the resources, training and funding made available to the pilot courts are rolled out as well.
An effective and properly funded family court system should be front and centre to help to reach the government’s target of halving violence against women and girls (VAWG). We have put forward a package of measures including specialised domestic abuse and child abuse support, assessment services and trauma-informed measures in court buildings.
The Bar Council is urging the government to provide a clear definition of VAWG and recognise that VAWG is preventable so that policies extend beyond reactive measures to incorporate prevention and early intervention strategies. At the very least, every complainant and every alleged perpetrator should have access to legal advice and representation.
We are providing data and ideas to the Leveson Review alongside carefully considering all the options that can help bear down on the backlog. The Bar Council will continue to advocate for a comprehensive and sustainable approach to the criminal justice system which will create stability and which, at the very least, must include Crown Courts to be resourced to sit at the maximum capacity; the establishment of a new independent fee review body reporting annually (just like judges have); and additional fees for lawyers.
The justice system has been starved of funds to save money, but cuts have impacted on access to justice for children, families and vulnerable adults, as well as increasing overall public spending costs.
The Ministry of Justice (MOJ) has now launched a consultation on civil legal aid fees for housing and debt work, and immigration and asylum work. The MOJ is also seeking further evidence on potential changes to some aspects of contractual requirements.
As the first funding increase for civil legal aid since 1996, the Bar Council has welcomed the proposed additional £20 million per annum investment. However, it is long overdue and fees for other civil legal aid categories are still under consideration. We need to see the injection of new money and we will press for funding as part of the second phase of the spending review due this spring.
Please join us in Birmingham this year for Bar Conference on Saturday 7 June and I hope that when it comes to subscribing to the Bar Representation Fee (BRF), like me, you can see the value in what the Bar Council does. Please subscribe during the authorisation to practise process.
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Examined by Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Time is precious for barristers. Every moment spent chasing paperwork, organising diaries, or managing admin is time taken away from what matters most: preparation, advocacy and your clients. That’s where Eden Assistants step in
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving Back donation to RAY Ceredigion, a grassroots West Wales charity that provides play, learning and community opportunities for families across Ceredigion County
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
Come in with your eyes open, but don’t let fear cloud the prospect. A view from practice by John Dove
Anon Academic explains why he’s leaving the world of English literature for the Bar – after all, the two are not as far apart as they may first seem...
Review by Stephen Cragg KC
