*/
David Josse QC discusses Slobodan Praljak’s dramatic death
The death of Slobodan Praljak, who at the moment that he learnt that his appeal had been rejected fatally drank a small quantity of poison from a vial whilst saying in Croatian ‘Judges, Slobodan Praljak is not a war criminal, with disdain I reject your verdict’ has left many asking various questions.
Not least among these is how he managed to get hold of the lethal poison?
As someone who was a regular visitor to the United Nations Detention Unit (UNDU) in The Hague where he was held, I can confirm that the security is tight. Indeed, the UNDU is a separate unit within the local Dutch prison and any visitor to the UNDU must pass through both the local Dutch security as well as that provided by the UN. However, it would be naïve to think that it would be difficult to smuggle a small amount of poison into the prison. After all security is tight in UK prisons but they are still full of illegal drugs.
Far more interesting is what prompted Praljak to this desperate act? Firstly, it is worth observing that Praljak was a man of many parts. He rose to the rank of General in the Croatian Armed Forces. Yet he had studied Dramatic Arts and was a well known TV and film director.
His sense of the theatrical permeated the whole of his mammoth and unwieldy trial. He faced an indictment with five other men and the trial itself from the actual opening through to the rendering of judgement took over seven years. The appeal process then took a further four years. In part, this was due to the leeway that the Trial Chamber gave Praljak. Much of the time he was allowed to be his own advocate endlessly cross examining many witness (eg the BBC journalist Jeremy Bowen). At other times he was able to call on either of his two counsel to address the Court and/or deal with witnesses on his behalf. If this wasn’t bad enough, it transpired that Praljak had misled the Tribunal as to his means and somewhat absurdly in 2016 was (rather optimistically) ordered to pay almost 3 million euro in what amounted to legal aid contribution back payments (see the full text here). Despite this the Tribunal allowed him to continue to benefit from the assistance of counsel through the appeal process.
In short, the judges of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) permitted Praljak to run them a merry dance. Largely through a lack of robustness they had allowed him to make the trial his stage. The rendering of the judgment in his appeal was quite literally the last act in what had long turned into a tragic farce. Had he not killed himself he would have faded into obscurity and be sent to serve the remainder of his sentence in some far-flung part of Europe. Instead, with the benefit of a live internet feed and with a true sense of theatre Praljak was determined to dominate the final scene. He succeeded in the most extraordinary and dramatic fashion.
Contributor David Josse QC is Head of Chambers at 5SAH
David Josse KC is a Vice-Chair of the Bar Council International Committee and Head of Chambers at 5 St Andrew’s Hill (5SAH). He specialises in extradition, human rights, and international war crimes. David spent five years at the ICTY defending in two lengthy trials. Firstly, representing a leading Bosnian Serb politician charged with genocide and ethnic cleansing and secondly, a General facing a variety of allegations relating to the Srebrenica massacre.
The death of Slobodan Praljak, who at the moment that he learnt that his appeal had been rejected fatally drank a small quantity of poison from a vial whilst saying in Croatian ‘Judges, Slobodan Praljak is not a war criminal, with disdain I reject your verdict’ has left many asking various questions.
Not least among these is how he managed to get hold of the lethal poison?
As someone who was a regular visitor to the United Nations Detention Unit (UNDU) in The Hague where he was held, I can confirm that the security is tight. Indeed, the UNDU is a separate unit within the local Dutch prison and any visitor to the UNDU must pass through both the local Dutch security as well as that provided by the UN. However, it would be naïve to think that it would be difficult to smuggle a small amount of poison into the prison. After all security is tight in UK prisons but they are still full of illegal drugs.
Far more interesting is what prompted Praljak to this desperate act? Firstly, it is worth observing that Praljak was a man of many parts. He rose to the rank of General in the Croatian Armed Forces. Yet he had studied Dramatic Arts and was a well known TV and film director.
His sense of the theatrical permeated the whole of his mammoth and unwieldy trial. He faced an indictment with five other men and the trial itself from the actual opening through to the rendering of judgement took over seven years. The appeal process then took a further four years. In part, this was due to the leeway that the Trial Chamber gave Praljak. Much of the time he was allowed to be his own advocate endlessly cross examining many witness (eg the BBC journalist Jeremy Bowen). At other times he was able to call on either of his two counsel to address the Court and/or deal with witnesses on his behalf. If this wasn’t bad enough, it transpired that Praljak had misled the Tribunal as to his means and somewhat absurdly in 2016 was (rather optimistically) ordered to pay almost 3 million euro in what amounted to legal aid contribution back payments (see the full text here). Despite this the Tribunal allowed him to continue to benefit from the assistance of counsel through the appeal process.
In short, the judges of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) permitted Praljak to run them a merry dance. Largely through a lack of robustness they had allowed him to make the trial his stage. The rendering of the judgment in his appeal was quite literally the last act in what had long turned into a tragic farce. Had he not killed himself he would have faded into obscurity and be sent to serve the remainder of his sentence in some far-flung part of Europe. Instead, with the benefit of a live internet feed and with a true sense of theatre Praljak was determined to dominate the final scene. He succeeded in the most extraordinary and dramatic fashion.
Contributor David Josse QC is Head of Chambers at 5SAH
David Josse QC discusses Slobodan Praljak’s dramatic death
The age of criminal responsibility, extreme weather and conflict resolution – plus, new protocol for reporting bullying at the Bar
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, discusses the upcoming changes to pensions and Inheritance Tax and the potential impact on your financial future
Save the Children UK is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
Barrister apprenticeships – shortly to provide the fourth pathway to the Bar – are an ideal opportunity to support local talent and ‘grow your own’, say Tim Coulson and Dr Jane Dennehy
Solicitor General Ellie Reeves KC MP discusses her decade as a trade union and employment law barrister, the demands of life as a Law Officer and the number one priority shaping her work. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
Why every major sporting event needs an anti-corruption policy. By Louis Weston
At least not that way, says Richard Paige
