*/
Reviewed by David Wurtzel
Intermediaries are the most innovative but at times controversial statutory special measure. At the simplest, the role of intermediaries is to assist police, judges and advocates when questioning vulnerable people. At the same time, they have effected a culture change in how vulnerable people are treated in the justice system: how they can give their best evidence, and in the case of defendants, how best they can participate in their own trial. Despite the expertise they bring from their professional lives (most are speech and language therapists), and the knowledge they gain of the vulnerable person through assessing them, intermediaries have not always been universally welcomed or their role understood. Having to adapt one’s questioning to take into account a witness or defendant’s disabilities, does not always come easily or willingly. Dr John Taggart has the advantage of having practised at both the English and Northern Irish Bars and having carried out extensive interviews before drawing on his experiences as practitioner and as an academic to produce this enquiring and challenging book.
Dr Taggart calls it a sociological study, but what clearly comes over are the practical questions of relevance to the criminal Bar. Is the intermediary’s role clear? Are they sufficiently empowered in court or are they treated as an outsider? Although they are neutral and independent, and there to be of help to both sides, how does neutrality interact with the task of enabling a vulnerable defendant to participate?
The book sets out the international context and the legal base in international conventions and in English statute law. Some important distinctions are highlighted. Section 29 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 made intermediaries available to prosecution and defence witnesses only. The statutory provision which allows them to assist defendants has never been brought into effect. Involvement with the defence has thus been left to judicial case management, and guidance from the Criminal Practice Rules and Directions and case law. The latter has until very recently discouraged the use of intermediaries for defendants, either as unnecessary or because judges can assume that advocates would not accept a brief in a case with vulnerable people unless they already knew how to question them appropriately. A generic ability however is no guarantee of the ability to deal with a particular person’s disabilities. In England there has been a parallel system of Registered Intermediaries for witnesses under the Ministry of Justice and of non-registered intermediaries to assist defendants. Some of the former also act as the latter and the book quotes from interviews which in particular make clear the challenges in assisting defendants. In Northern Ireland intermediaries are trained both to help witnesses and defendants, the latter when giving evidence and further, at the police station. As Dr Taggart points out, if someone needs intermediary assistance when giving evidence in court, it makes no sense of them not to have it when being questioned by the police.
In the end the book calls for ‘earlier and better engagement with lawyers’ and for training on the work of intermediaries for police, barristers and judges. Can one hope that there could even be joint training? That there is a myth that intermediaries are a job creation scheme and make a lot of money sadly demonstrates how badly myth-busting training is needed for the Bar. ‘The importance of this book goes beyond understanding the day-to-day work of intermediaries,’ he writes. The use of intermediaries reminds us of broader issues about the criminal justice system which we have yet to explore.
David Wurtzel practised at the criminal Bar for 27 years and is a door tenant at 18 Red Lion Court. Prior to his retirement, he was a consultant in the CPD department at City Law School and consultant editor of Counsel. David is a member of the Counsel Editorial Board.
Intermediaries are the most innovative but at times controversial statutory special measure. At the simplest, the role of intermediaries is to assist police, judges and advocates when questioning vulnerable people. At the same time, they have effected a culture change in how vulnerable people are treated in the justice system: how they can give their best evidence, and in the case of defendants, how best they can participate in their own trial. Despite the expertise they bring from their professional lives (most are speech and language therapists), and the knowledge they gain of the vulnerable person through assessing them, intermediaries have not always been universally welcomed or their role understood. Having to adapt one’s questioning to take into account a witness or defendant’s disabilities, does not always come easily or willingly. Dr John Taggart has the advantage of having practised at both the English and Northern Irish Bars and having carried out extensive interviews before drawing on his experiences as practitioner and as an academic to produce this enquiring and challenging book.
Dr Taggart calls it a sociological study, but what clearly comes over are the practical questions of relevance to the criminal Bar. Is the intermediary’s role clear? Are they sufficiently empowered in court or are they treated as an outsider? Although they are neutral and independent, and there to be of help to both sides, how does neutrality interact with the task of enabling a vulnerable defendant to participate?
The book sets out the international context and the legal base in international conventions and in English statute law. Some important distinctions are highlighted. Section 29 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 made intermediaries available to prosecution and defence witnesses only. The statutory provision which allows them to assist defendants has never been brought into effect. Involvement with the defence has thus been left to judicial case management, and guidance from the Criminal Practice Rules and Directions and case law. The latter has until very recently discouraged the use of intermediaries for defendants, either as unnecessary or because judges can assume that advocates would not accept a brief in a case with vulnerable people unless they already knew how to question them appropriately. A generic ability however is no guarantee of the ability to deal with a particular person’s disabilities. In England there has been a parallel system of Registered Intermediaries for witnesses under the Ministry of Justice and of non-registered intermediaries to assist defendants. Some of the former also act as the latter and the book quotes from interviews which in particular make clear the challenges in assisting defendants. In Northern Ireland intermediaries are trained both to help witnesses and defendants, the latter when giving evidence and further, at the police station. As Dr Taggart points out, if someone needs intermediary assistance when giving evidence in court, it makes no sense of them not to have it when being questioned by the police.
In the end the book calls for ‘earlier and better engagement with lawyers’ and for training on the work of intermediaries for police, barristers and judges. Can one hope that there could even be joint training? That there is a myth that intermediaries are a job creation scheme and make a lot of money sadly demonstrates how badly myth-busting training is needed for the Bar. ‘The importance of this book goes beyond understanding the day-to-day work of intermediaries,’ he writes. The use of intermediaries reminds us of broader issues about the criminal justice system which we have yet to explore.
Reviewed by David Wurtzel
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
