*/
Fraser Coxhill reports from this year’s competition final.
On Saturday 28 March 2009 the normally hushed halls of the Central Criminal Court in London were taken over by more than 200 young people perfecting speeches, tactics and costumes. This was the final of the Bar National Mock Trial Competition run by the Citizenship Foundation in partnership with the Bar Council, Faculty of Advocates, the Bar Council of Northern Ireland, the Inns of Court and the Circuits. The annual competition attracts 160 schools and 2,000 young people from all over the UK. It provides 15–18-year-olds from state secondary schools and further education colleges with an opportunity to experience the profession and helps to demystify the criminal justice system by allowing participants to play the roles of advocates, witnesses, jurors and court staff.
For the 16 finalists, the day represented the culmination of four months of hard work, beginning with the regional heats and then the final held at the Old Bailey itself. The teams competed in a round-robin event during which they presented two cases. Each case was presided over by a circuit judge or QC who included the leaders of the Northern, South Eastern and Western Circuits and the Chairman of the Bar, Desmond Browne QC.
North-eastern talent
The subject matter included dangerous driving and assault by a teacher on a student. The final was presided over by His Honour Judge Moss QC and watched by family members, teachers and volunteers in a packed Court 1. Twins (no, your eyes are not deceiving you), Ben and Dan Brown of Ponteland High School, Northumberland, represented the Crown and students from Sir Henry Floyd Grammar School represented the defendant. In the end, after a keenly fought contest, the twins were victorious and Ponteland High School became the 18th school to win the competition. His Honour Judge Moss QC noted the excellent standards of both teams—witnesses, clerks and ushers as well as counsel. Those on the North Eastern Circuit will also be interested to hear that this is the second successive year that the prize has gone to the winners of the Newcastle heat (last year’s winners were Whitley Bay High School). Clearly the North East is a hotbed of future Bar talent.
Standards of advocacy
I was truly astonished by the standard of advocacy on display, the depth of understanding of the subject matter and the time and effort that had clearly gone into the presentation of the cases. The students’ grasp of the burden and standard of proof was remarkable. One 15-year-old foreman said after returning a verdict of not guilty: “We suspect he probably was guilty but we could not be sure.” On that evidence, we are all in safe hands.
Fraser Coxhill is a member of the Young Barristers’ Committee and is a barrister at QEB Hollis Whiteman
Get involved
If you have been inspired to become involved in next year’s competition, through judging rounds, becoming a barrister adviser assisting schools in their preparation, or even lending your wig and gown to participants, email: jaheeda.subhan@citizenshipfoundation.org.uk.
For the 16 finalists, the day represented the culmination of four months of hard work, beginning with the regional heats and then the final held at the Old Bailey itself. The teams competed in a round-robin event during which they presented two cases. Each case was presided over by a circuit judge or QC who included the leaders of the Northern, South Eastern and Western Circuits and the Chairman of the Bar, Desmond Browne QC.
North-eastern talent
The subject matter included dangerous driving and assault by a teacher on a student. The final was presided over by His Honour Judge Moss QC and watched by family members, teachers and volunteers in a packed Court 1. Twins (no, your eyes are not deceiving you), Ben and Dan Brown of Ponteland High School, Northumberland, represented the Crown and students from Sir Henry Floyd Grammar School represented the defendant. In the end, after a keenly fought contest, the twins were victorious and Ponteland High School became the 18th school to win the competition. His Honour Judge Moss QC noted the excellent standards of both teams—witnesses, clerks and ushers as well as counsel. Those on the North Eastern Circuit will also be interested to hear that this is the second successive year that the prize has gone to the winners of the Newcastle heat (last year’s winners were Whitley Bay High School). Clearly the North East is a hotbed of future Bar talent.
Standards of advocacy
I was truly astonished by the standard of advocacy on display, the depth of understanding of the subject matter and the time and effort that had clearly gone into the presentation of the cases. The students’ grasp of the burden and standard of proof was remarkable. One 15-year-old foreman said after returning a verdict of not guilty: “We suspect he probably was guilty but we could not be sure.” On that evidence, we are all in safe hands.
Fraser Coxhill is a member of the Young Barristers’ Committee and is a barrister at QEB Hollis Whiteman
Get involved
If you have been inspired to become involved in next year’s competition, through judging rounds, becoming a barrister adviser assisting schools in their preparation, or even lending your wig and gown to participants, email: jaheeda.subhan@citizenshipfoundation.org.uk.
Fraser Coxhill reports from this year’s competition final.
On Saturday 28 March 2009 the normally hushed halls of the Central Criminal Court in London were taken over by more than 200 young people perfecting speeches, tactics and costumes. This was the final of the Bar National Mock Trial Competition run by the Citizenship Foundation in partnership with the Bar Council, Faculty of Advocates, the Bar Council of Northern Ireland, the Inns of Court and the Circuits. The annual competition attracts 160 schools and 2,000 young people from all over the UK. It provides 15–18-year-olds from state secondary schools and further education colleges with an opportunity to experience the profession and helps to demystify the criminal justice system by allowing participants to play the roles of advocates, witnesses, jurors and court staff.
Update from the Chair of the Bar
By Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group
Modernising communication and collaboration at a leading Chancery set. A Zexi case study
How to build profile without compromising professional duties. By Naumaan Farooq, Co-Founder of Inked PR
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the role of cut-off levels, and the wider range of factors that must be considered when interpreting results for family court proceedings
Endometriosis Awareness North, a charity raising awareness of endometriosis and supporting those affected across the North of England, has received a £500 boost from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
A decade of reviews and research has disrupted accepted thinking in the search for causality. Suicides following abuse have overtaken domestic homicides. Is the law keeping up? Professor Susan Edwards KC (Hon) examines recent cases and the obstacles to successful prosecution
The case against judge-only justice – and why efficiency is not enough. By Professor Leslie Thomas KC
Heritage as an anchor and a compass, finding our common humanity and embracing the power of the outsider – Melina Antoniadis’s lessons learnt
Seeing the full picture – Baljit Ubhey OBE outlines the CPS action plan to tackle violence against women and girls, offering insights directly relevant to courtroom practice
Lauren Fullerton examines the how, what and why of setting up a second chambers base
