*/
Data Protection Law and Practice (4th edition)
Rosemary Jay
ISBN: 9780414024960
December 2012
Publisher: Sweet and Maxwell
£225
Data protection is not a popular subject, even among lawyers. Most of us have been refused an answer to some innocuous question “because of data protection”. The Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998 is badly drafted and obscure: for instance, it uses schedules to deal with matters of fundamental principle rather than supporting detail.
Nevertheless the subject is inescapable, and increasingly important, as the mass of personal information held about each of us by both public and private sector bodies continues to expand. The 2007 HMRC data disaster – when two CDs containing the child benefit database were mislaid – prompted a heightened awareness of data security; as a result, the Information Commissioner was given the power to impose monetary penalties of up to £500,000 for serious breaches of DPA 1998.
More recently, the Leveson Inquiry has focused attention on the role of data protection in relation to the media. Most members of the Bar will have to consider DPA 1998 at some point, either when advising clients, or in relation to their own role as “data controllers” under the Act.
The 4th edition of the leading practitioner text, Rosemary Jay’s Data Protection Law and Practice, is therefore extremely welcome. The author has 25 years’ experience in the field, working for the Information Commissioner and then for two leading law firms; she is assisted by three expert co-authors. For breadth of coverage and depth of analysis, the book has no serious competitor.
The 1998 Act – and the 1995 Directive that it implements – are at its heart, but there is also detailed consideration of related issues: eg, privacy rights under the Human Rights Act 1998, the monitoring of communications, and access to criminal records. The mass of material is well organised, and a summary of main points at the start of each chapter helps the reader to acquire a sense of the subject’s overall structure. The dearth of case law on many of the issues covered only serves to emphasise the importance of the analysis provided. In short, every practitioner will need access to this book; and every chambers library should have a copy.
Timothy Pitt-Payne QC of 11KBW practises in information law, public law, local government law, and employment law.
Nevertheless the subject is inescapable, and increasingly important, as the mass of personal information held about each of us by both public and private sector bodies continues to expand. The 2007 HMRC data disaster – when two CDs containing the child benefit database were mislaid – prompted a heightened awareness of data security; as a result, the Information Commissioner was given the power to impose monetary penalties of up to £500,000 for serious breaches of DPA 1998.
More recently, the Leveson Inquiry has focused attention on the role of data protection in relation to the media. Most members of the Bar will have to consider DPA 1998 at some point, either when advising clients, or in relation to their own role as “data controllers” under the Act.
The 4th edition of the leading practitioner text, Rosemary Jay’s Data Protection Law and Practice, is therefore extremely welcome. The author has 25 years’ experience in the field, working for the Information Commissioner and then for two leading law firms; she is assisted by three expert co-authors. For breadth of coverage and depth of analysis, the book has no serious competitor.
The 1998 Act – and the 1995 Directive that it implements – are at its heart, but there is also detailed consideration of related issues: eg, privacy rights under the Human Rights Act 1998, the monitoring of communications, and access to criminal records. The mass of material is well organised, and a summary of main points at the start of each chapter helps the reader to acquire a sense of the subject’s overall structure. The dearth of case law on many of the issues covered only serves to emphasise the importance of the analysis provided. In short, every practitioner will need access to this book; and every chambers library should have a copy.
Timothy Pitt-Payne QC of 11KBW practises in information law, public law, local government law, and employment law.
Data Protection Law and Practice (4th edition)
Rosemary Jay
ISBN: 9780414024960
December 2012
Publisher: Sweet and Maxwell
£225
Data protection is not a popular subject, even among lawyers. Most of us have been refused an answer to some innocuous question “because of data protection”. The Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998 is badly drafted and obscure: for instance, it uses schedules to deal with matters of fundamental principle rather than supporting detail.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Oscar Davies shares their lessons learnt
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge