*/
a144b3b3-79b0-4682-937f-6b7b07520c84.png?sfvrsn=783be11c_1)
© Henry Dannell
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
For many barristers, securing a mortgage can be an unexpectedly complex process. Unlike salaried employees, your income is structured in a way that lenders often struggle to assess due to self-employment, fluctuating case-based earnings, or a bespoke tax structure.
While high street lenders can apply rigid affordability criteria, there are specialist lenders who understand the nuances of a barrister’s career.
If you’ve ever had a mortgage application declined despite strong earnings, it was likely due to a lender applying a standard assessment approach that didn’t reflect your financial reality. In many cases, this rejection was unnecessary.
A bit like a day in court, this is where specialist advice and expertise make all the difference.
Working with an adviser who understands both the legal profession and lender criteria ensures that your income is presented in the most effective way – maximising your borrowing potential.
The challenge: A newly qualified barrister, recently moved from pupillage to tenancy, wanted to secure a mortgage but had only one year of tax records.
The solution: Instead of using standard self-employed lending criteria, we placed the mortgage with a lender who accepted projected earnings and recent chambers records as proof of income.
The result: The client successfully secured a mortgage on competitive terms without having to wait for two full years of trading history.
The challenge: A senior barrister earning through both chambers and as a fee-paid judge was struggling to get a mortgage approved because different lenders assessed each income stream inconsistently.
The solution: We positioned the client’s finances holistically, presenting a comprehensive view of their combined earnings to a lender familiar with barristers’ income structures.
The result: The client was able to borrow at a higher multiple, securing a mortgage at the level required.
Many barristers structure their income for tax efficiency, and it’s common for their accounting periods to differ from the tax year. This can result in varying income figures across tax and accounting documents – potentially reducing affordability on paper, depending on what a lender chooses to review.
Because lenders assess income differently, a specialist mortgage adviser can help ensure your tax strategy doesn’t limit your borrowing. This may involve identifying lenders who accept chambers reports, recent figures, income projections, or a combination of sources.
Securing a mortgage as a barrister doesn’t have to be a frustrating process, but mainstream lenders don’t always recognise the true earning potential of legal professionals. Many barristers only seek advice after facing mortgage rejections, but proactive guidance can prevent those challenges altogether. At Henry Dannell, we work with lenders who recognise barristers’ career trajectories and earnings patterns – ensuring your financial profile is assessed correctly.
With expert guidance, securing the right mortgage becomes a seamless process rather than a stressful challenge.
Visit our dedicated Barrister Portal to book a personalised consultation with one of our expert advisers for tailored support. You can also explore our expert insights, make use of our mortgage calculators, and benefit from our 24/7 mortgage review service.
Disclaimer
A mortgage is secured against your home. Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage or any other debt secured on it. Mortgage deals may not be available, and lending is subject to individual circumstances and status.
Kem Kemal is Co-Founder and CEO of Henry Dannell.
For many barristers, securing a mortgage can be an unexpectedly complex process. Unlike salaried employees, your income is structured in a way that lenders often struggle to assess due to self-employment, fluctuating case-based earnings, or a bespoke tax structure.
While high street lenders can apply rigid affordability criteria, there are specialist lenders who understand the nuances of a barrister’s career.
If you’ve ever had a mortgage application declined despite strong earnings, it was likely due to a lender applying a standard assessment approach that didn’t reflect your financial reality. In many cases, this rejection was unnecessary.
A bit like a day in court, this is where specialist advice and expertise make all the difference.
Working with an adviser who understands both the legal profession and lender criteria ensures that your income is presented in the most effective way – maximising your borrowing potential.
The challenge: A newly qualified barrister, recently moved from pupillage to tenancy, wanted to secure a mortgage but had only one year of tax records.
The solution: Instead of using standard self-employed lending criteria, we placed the mortgage with a lender who accepted projected earnings and recent chambers records as proof of income.
The result: The client successfully secured a mortgage on competitive terms without having to wait for two full years of trading history.
The challenge: A senior barrister earning through both chambers and as a fee-paid judge was struggling to get a mortgage approved because different lenders assessed each income stream inconsistently.
The solution: We positioned the client’s finances holistically, presenting a comprehensive view of their combined earnings to a lender familiar with barristers’ income structures.
The result: The client was able to borrow at a higher multiple, securing a mortgage at the level required.
Many barristers structure their income for tax efficiency, and it’s common for their accounting periods to differ from the tax year. This can result in varying income figures across tax and accounting documents – potentially reducing affordability on paper, depending on what a lender chooses to review.
Because lenders assess income differently, a specialist mortgage adviser can help ensure your tax strategy doesn’t limit your borrowing. This may involve identifying lenders who accept chambers reports, recent figures, income projections, or a combination of sources.
Securing a mortgage as a barrister doesn’t have to be a frustrating process, but mainstream lenders don’t always recognise the true earning potential of legal professionals. Many barristers only seek advice after facing mortgage rejections, but proactive guidance can prevent those challenges altogether. At Henry Dannell, we work with lenders who recognise barristers’ career trajectories and earnings patterns – ensuring your financial profile is assessed correctly.
With expert guidance, securing the right mortgage becomes a seamless process rather than a stressful challenge.
Visit our dedicated Barrister Portal to book a personalised consultation with one of our expert advisers for tailored support. You can also explore our expert insights, make use of our mortgage calculators, and benefit from our 24/7 mortgage review service.
Disclaimer
A mortgage is secured against your home. Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage or any other debt secured on it. Mortgage deals may not be available, and lending is subject to individual circumstances and status.
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Examined by Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Time is precious for barristers. Every moment spent chasing paperwork, organising diaries, or managing admin is time taken away from what matters most: preparation, advocacy and your clients. That’s where Eden Assistants step in
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving Back donation to RAY Ceredigion, a grassroots West Wales charity that provides play, learning and community opportunities for families across Ceredigion County
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
Come in with your eyes open, but don’t let fear cloud the prospect. A view from practice by John Dove
Anon Academic explains why he’s leaving the world of English literature for the Bar – after all, the two are not as far apart as they may first seem...
Review by Stephen Cragg KC
