*/
I secured pupillage and tenancy in a mixed common law set, which allowed me to gain experience in a variety of areas, namely family, immigration, Court of Protection and public inquiries. In my early years of practice, I became increasingly drawn to children law and Court of Protection work, so it was a natural next step to look to join a specialist family law set.
My advice to anyone scoping out new chambers is to consider the opponents you have been against in court. Do they impress you? Do they have the skills and expertise that you would want to learn, as well as associate with, by virtue of being in the same set? What are they like out of court? For me, it is important to belong to a set where the environment is truly collegiate, friendly and supportive. I gauged this from pre-hearing discussions at court with opponents and attending events where I would speak to members. I also had informal conversations with barristers from chambers of interest. From this research I felt 4PB would be a good fit for me.
Another motivation was to have a greater opportunity to be instructed on complex cases in emerging areas and on issues of public importance. I have already been led on such cases, and am expanding my network of instructing solicitors, thereby elevating my practice further.
Another priority was to move to a set that would support me in building a practice focused on my interests. My experience working in other areas has been hugely helpful in family and Court of Protection cases which overlap. I have particular specialisms in honour-based abuse, namely female genital mutilation and forced marriage, as well as working with deaf clients and I am in the process of undertaking BSL qualifications. The clerking team have indeed diligently kept these in mind when allocating work and used their network to further my work in these areas, and more widely.
Moving chambers can feel daunting. However, it need not be. As with any move, do as much due diligence as possible, both formal and informal, to understand which chambers will be the best fit for you – and you for them. Moving chambers is an opportunity to grow your practice further, learning from and working with new colleagues in an environment which suits you and your priorities.
I secured pupillage and tenancy in a mixed common law set, which allowed me to gain experience in a variety of areas, namely family, immigration, Court of Protection and public inquiries. In my early years of practice, I became increasingly drawn to children law and Court of Protection work, so it was a natural next step to look to join a specialist family law set.
My advice to anyone scoping out new chambers is to consider the opponents you have been against in court. Do they impress you? Do they have the skills and expertise that you would want to learn, as well as associate with, by virtue of being in the same set? What are they like out of court? For me, it is important to belong to a set where the environment is truly collegiate, friendly and supportive. I gauged this from pre-hearing discussions at court with opponents and attending events where I would speak to members. I also had informal conversations with barristers from chambers of interest. From this research I felt 4PB would be a good fit for me.
Another motivation was to have a greater opportunity to be instructed on complex cases in emerging areas and on issues of public importance. I have already been led on such cases, and am expanding my network of instructing solicitors, thereby elevating my practice further.
Another priority was to move to a set that would support me in building a practice focused on my interests. My experience working in other areas has been hugely helpful in family and Court of Protection cases which overlap. I have particular specialisms in honour-based abuse, namely female genital mutilation and forced marriage, as well as working with deaf clients and I am in the process of undertaking BSL qualifications. The clerking team have indeed diligently kept these in mind when allocating work and used their network to further my work in these areas, and more widely.
Moving chambers can feel daunting. However, it need not be. As with any move, do as much due diligence as possible, both formal and informal, to understand which chambers will be the best fit for you – and you for them. Moving chambers is an opportunity to grow your practice further, learning from and working with new colleagues in an environment which suits you and your priorities.
Far-ranging month for the Chair of the Bar
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the most recent data on alcohol misuse in the UK, and the implications for alcohol testing in family proceedings
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how tailored financial planning can help barristers take control of their finances and plan with confidence
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
In this wide-ranging interview, Professor Jo Delahunty KC, Family Law KC of the Year, talks to Anthony Inglese CB about the values that shaped her, the moment she found her vocation and, in an intensely personal call to arms, why time is running out for the legal aid Bar
Is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office process fit for purpose? Women barristers’ experiences of bullying are not being reported or, if they are, they are not making it through the system, says Tana Adkin KC
Thomas Roe KC and Andrew O’Kola respond to an article by Dr Leonardo Raznovich (Counsel , October 2025) – ‘Privy Council colonialism? Piercing the constitutional veil’
Chair of the Bar reports back
The client’s best interests could be well-served by sharing the advocacy with junior counsel more often than you might think – Naomi Cunningham and Charlotte Eves explore some less orthodox ways to divide the speaking role