*/
In the second part of his feature on information security, Graham Cunningham looks at the guidelines regarding physical material.
Last month, I wrote about your responsibilities under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998), concerning electronic processing of personal information. It was designed for your protection and, most especially to avoid you having to give undertakings to the Information Commissioner or pay fines. This month, I want to concentrate on physical material; ie, the paper in the lever arch files that makes up the average brief. Generally speaking, the sort of physical material you get in the average brief does not come within DPA 1998.
The Act, however, does cover manual files where these have been structured in such a way that personal information in them can readily be found without searching. It is then your obligation to treat this information as if it was held in electronic format. If you (or your clerks) do receive briefs in electronic format or you decide to scan physical material and manipulate it, then technically you are processing data and fall within DPA 1998.
That said, you are not absolved from all responsibilities. This is your client’s confidential information and has to be treated as such. Physical confidential information is much wider than the ambit of DPA 1998. The Act is essentially concerned with protecting the privacy of living individuals; confidential information covers everything from written information about individuals to inventions to marketing information and so on.
What to do with confidential information
Your IT Panel would like to restate formally what to do with confidential information:
If you do government or government agency work, you need to comply with the Attorney General’s guidelines on information security to be found at: www.tsol.gov.uk/PanelCounsel/security.htm.
Secure disposal
It is a requirement of DPA 1998 that personal data should not be retained for longer than is required. However, this may be seven years or longer for case files. Accordingly, the retention of personal data should be reviewed regularly. The retention of precedents, pleadings, advices and documents that have been used in open court, from which personal data have been removed by anonymising, is not a breach of DPA 1998.
Chambers should have procedures in place for the secure disposal of confidential material and electronic media (eg, the cross-cut shredding of papers and CD-ROMs) and hard drives.
Barristers who wish to dispose of any computer or electronic media upon which confidential material has been stored must ensure the material is effectively destroyed or wiped using a recognised method to put the data beyond recovery. Merely deleting the files, single-pass overwriting, or reformatting the disk is insufficient. Physical destruction or the use of specialist deletion and overwriting software is necessary.
Further information
This completes the IT Panel’s summary on how to treat both electronically processed and written information. It would be happy to answer queries from barristers.
Please contact Alexandra McHenry (AMcHenry@BarCouncil.org.uk).
Rule 702 of the Code of Conduct states:
“Whether or not the relation of counsel and client continues a barrister must preserve the confidentiality of the lay client’s affairs and must not without the prior consent of the lay client or as permitted by law lend or reveal the contents of the papers in any instructions to or communicate to any third person (other than another barrister, a pupil, in the case of a Registered European Lawyer, the person with whom he is acting in conjunction for the purposes of paragraph 5(3) of the Registered European Lawyers Rules or any other person who needs to know it for the performance of their duties) information which has been entrusted to him in confidence or use such information to the lay client’s detriment or to his own or another client’s advantage.”
Graham Cunningham, with contributions from Iain Mitchell QC, Clive Freedman and Jacqueline Reid of the Bar Council IT Panel
The Act, however, does cover manual files where these have been structured in such a way that personal information in them can readily be found without searching. It is then your obligation to treat this information as if it was held in electronic format. If you (or your clerks) do receive briefs in electronic format or you decide to scan physical material and manipulate it, then technically you are processing data and fall within DPA 1998.
That said, you are not absolved from all responsibilities. This is your client’s confidential information and has to be treated as such. Physical confidential information is much wider than the ambit of DPA 1998. The Act is essentially concerned with protecting the privacy of living individuals; confidential information covers everything from written information about individuals to inventions to marketing information and so on.
What to do with confidential information
Your IT Panel would like to restate formally what to do with confidential information:
If you do government or government agency work, you need to comply with the Attorney General’s guidelines on information security to be found at: www.tsol.gov.uk/PanelCounsel/security.htm.
Secure disposal
It is a requirement of DPA 1998 that personal data should not be retained for longer than is required. However, this may be seven years or longer for case files. Accordingly, the retention of personal data should be reviewed regularly. The retention of precedents, pleadings, advices and documents that have been used in open court, from which personal data have been removed by anonymising, is not a breach of DPA 1998.
Chambers should have procedures in place for the secure disposal of confidential material and electronic media (eg, the cross-cut shredding of papers and CD-ROMs) and hard drives.
Barristers who wish to dispose of any computer or electronic media upon which confidential material has been stored must ensure the material is effectively destroyed or wiped using a recognised method to put the data beyond recovery. Merely deleting the files, single-pass overwriting, or reformatting the disk is insufficient. Physical destruction or the use of specialist deletion and overwriting software is necessary.
Further information
This completes the IT Panel’s summary on how to treat both electronically processed and written information. It would be happy to answer queries from barristers.
Please contact Alexandra McHenry (AMcHenry@BarCouncil.org.uk).
Rule 702 of the Code of Conduct states:
“Whether or not the relation of counsel and client continues a barrister must preserve the confidentiality of the lay client’s affairs and must not without the prior consent of the lay client or as permitted by law lend or reveal the contents of the papers in any instructions to or communicate to any third person (other than another barrister, a pupil, in the case of a Registered European Lawyer, the person with whom he is acting in conjunction for the purposes of paragraph 5(3) of the Registered European Lawyers Rules or any other person who needs to know it for the performance of their duties) information which has been entrusted to him in confidence or use such information to the lay client’s detriment or to his own or another client’s advantage.”
Graham Cunningham, with contributions from Iain Mitchell QC, Clive Freedman and Jacqueline Reid of the Bar Council IT Panel
In the second part of his feature on information security, Graham Cunningham looks at the guidelines regarding physical material.
Last month, I wrote about your responsibilities under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998), concerning electronic processing of personal information. It was designed for your protection and, most especially to avoid you having to give undertakings to the Information Commissioner or pay fines. This month, I want to concentrate on physical material; ie, the paper in the lever arch files that makes up the average brief. Generally speaking, the sort of physical material you get in the average brief does not come within DPA 1998.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
