*/
In the second part of his feature on information security, Graham Cunningham looks at the guidelines regarding physical material.
Last month, I wrote about your responsibilities under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998), concerning electronic processing of personal information. It was designed for your protection and, most especially to avoid you having to give undertakings to the Information Commissioner or pay fines. This month, I want to concentrate on physical material; ie, the paper in the lever arch files that makes up the average brief. Generally speaking, the sort of physical material you get in the average brief does not come within DPA 1998.
The Act, however, does cover manual files where these have been structured in such a way that personal information in them can readily be found without searching. It is then your obligation to treat this information as if it was held in electronic format. If you (or your clerks) do receive briefs in electronic format or you decide to scan physical material and manipulate it, then technically you are processing data and fall within DPA 1998.
That said, you are not absolved from all responsibilities. This is your client’s confidential information and has to be treated as such. Physical confidential information is much wider than the ambit of DPA 1998. The Act is essentially concerned with protecting the privacy of living individuals; confidential information covers everything from written information about individuals to inventions to marketing information and so on.
What to do with confidential information
Your IT Panel would like to restate formally what to do with confidential information:
If you do government or government agency work, you need to comply with the Attorney General’s guidelines on information security to be found at: www.tsol.gov.uk/PanelCounsel/security.htm.
Secure disposal
It is a requirement of DPA 1998 that personal data should not be retained for longer than is required. However, this may be seven years or longer for case files. Accordingly, the retention of personal data should be reviewed regularly. The retention of precedents, pleadings, advices and documents that have been used in open court, from which personal data have been removed by anonymising, is not a breach of DPA 1998.
Chambers should have procedures in place for the secure disposal of confidential material and electronic media (eg, the cross-cut shredding of papers and CD-ROMs) and hard drives.
Barristers who wish to dispose of any computer or electronic media upon which confidential material has been stored must ensure the material is effectively destroyed or wiped using a recognised method to put the data beyond recovery. Merely deleting the files, single-pass overwriting, or reformatting the disk is insufficient. Physical destruction or the use of specialist deletion and overwriting software is necessary.
Further information
This completes the IT Panel’s summary on how to treat both electronically processed and written information. It would be happy to answer queries from barristers.
Please contact Alexandra McHenry (AMcHenry@BarCouncil.org.uk).
Rule 702 of the Code of Conduct states:
“Whether or not the relation of counsel and client continues a barrister must preserve the confidentiality of the lay client’s affairs and must not without the prior consent of the lay client or as permitted by law lend or reveal the contents of the papers in any instructions to or communicate to any third person (other than another barrister, a pupil, in the case of a Registered European Lawyer, the person with whom he is acting in conjunction for the purposes of paragraph 5(3) of the Registered European Lawyers Rules or any other person who needs to know it for the performance of their duties) information which has been entrusted to him in confidence or use such information to the lay client’s detriment or to his own or another client’s advantage.”
Graham Cunningham, with contributions from Iain Mitchell QC, Clive Freedman and Jacqueline Reid of the Bar Council IT Panel
The Act, however, does cover manual files where these have been structured in such a way that personal information in them can readily be found without searching. It is then your obligation to treat this information as if it was held in electronic format. If you (or your clerks) do receive briefs in electronic format or you decide to scan physical material and manipulate it, then technically you are processing data and fall within DPA 1998.
That said, you are not absolved from all responsibilities. This is your client’s confidential information and has to be treated as such. Physical confidential information is much wider than the ambit of DPA 1998. The Act is essentially concerned with protecting the privacy of living individuals; confidential information covers everything from written information about individuals to inventions to marketing information and so on.
What to do with confidential information
Your IT Panel would like to restate formally what to do with confidential information:
If you do government or government agency work, you need to comply with the Attorney General’s guidelines on information security to be found at: www.tsol.gov.uk/PanelCounsel/security.htm.
Secure disposal
It is a requirement of DPA 1998 that personal data should not be retained for longer than is required. However, this may be seven years or longer for case files. Accordingly, the retention of personal data should be reviewed regularly. The retention of precedents, pleadings, advices and documents that have been used in open court, from which personal data have been removed by anonymising, is not a breach of DPA 1998.
Chambers should have procedures in place for the secure disposal of confidential material and electronic media (eg, the cross-cut shredding of papers and CD-ROMs) and hard drives.
Barristers who wish to dispose of any computer or electronic media upon which confidential material has been stored must ensure the material is effectively destroyed or wiped using a recognised method to put the data beyond recovery. Merely deleting the files, single-pass overwriting, or reformatting the disk is insufficient. Physical destruction or the use of specialist deletion and overwriting software is necessary.
Further information
This completes the IT Panel’s summary on how to treat both electronically processed and written information. It would be happy to answer queries from barristers.
Please contact Alexandra McHenry (AMcHenry@BarCouncil.org.uk).
Rule 702 of the Code of Conduct states:
“Whether or not the relation of counsel and client continues a barrister must preserve the confidentiality of the lay client’s affairs and must not without the prior consent of the lay client or as permitted by law lend or reveal the contents of the papers in any instructions to or communicate to any third person (other than another barrister, a pupil, in the case of a Registered European Lawyer, the person with whom he is acting in conjunction for the purposes of paragraph 5(3) of the Registered European Lawyers Rules or any other person who needs to know it for the performance of their duties) information which has been entrusted to him in confidence or use such information to the lay client’s detriment or to his own or another client’s advantage.”
Graham Cunningham, with contributions from Iain Mitchell QC, Clive Freedman and Jacqueline Reid of the Bar Council IT Panel
In the second part of his feature on information security, Graham Cunningham looks at the guidelines regarding physical material.
Last month, I wrote about your responsibilities under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998), concerning electronic processing of personal information. It was designed for your protection and, most especially to avoid you having to give undertakings to the Information Commissioner or pay fines. This month, I want to concentrate on physical material; ie, the paper in the lever arch files that makes up the average brief. Generally speaking, the sort of physical material you get in the average brief does not come within DPA 1998.
Chair of the Bar reports back
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Get ready to lead in a rapidly evolving digital landscape
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
There is no typical day in the life as a Supreme Court judicial assistant, says Josephine Gillingwater, and that’s what makes the role so enjoyably diverse
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Baffled by the government’s proposed s 41 reforms and by the Law Commission’s preferred model, Laura Hoyano looks at what won’t work, and what will
