*/
Time for the Bar to rise to the equality challenge and find more effective ways for women to stay on in the profession, argues Fiona Jackson
In July the Bar Standards Board (BSB) published Women at the Bar , a report of its survey of all practising female barristers on the implementation and effectiveness of the Equality Rules that came into force in 2012.
Over 1,300 women took the opportunity to respond; almost 80% were self-employed barristers in chambers (see 'Women and the equality rules', Counsel).
In summary, recruitment was generally seen as fair, but awareness of regulatory requirements in chambers to both monitor work allocation and have harassment policies was low. Only a small proportion of those who had experienced harassment or discrimination felt able to report it, citing concern about the impact on their career and prevailing attitudes within the profession.
Experience of flexible working policies in practice was mixed. Awareness of maternity/parental leave policies was found to be high, but many felt that taking such leave had a negative impact on their practice. Consequently a large majority of respondents had contemplated leaving the Bar, especially those from a BAME (black and minority ethnic) background, those who had experienced discrimination or harassment, or were the primary carer for children.
Seizing opportunities for change
The survey should be welcomed for giving another opportunity for women barristers to relate their experiences and drive the agenda for change. The BSB recommendations stemming from the report, apparently due later this year, must be driven by a desire to improve retention, with strong enforcement of the Equality Rules and quick response to legislative change as a priority. For example, the Bar Council has repeatedly pressed for regulation of shared parental leave but the BSB is yet to consult on this issue. Self-employed parents wanting to combine professional practice and duties to chambers with childcare responsibilities continue to encounter difficulties meanwhile. Most respondents reported the Equality Rules have not yet had a significant impact. The report could have done more to explore what our regulator could be doing to help women and it would have been useful to establish when the incidents of harassment and discrimination occurred.
Removing obstacles
The Bar is a highly competitive profession that, in my view, should continue to recruit and retain the best and brightest lawyers solely on merit and regardless of their gender, ethnic background, age, sexual orientation or disability. Where there are any barriers and obstacles still in place that artificially act to distort that equal recruitment and retention, we must act speedily to remove them to ensure that there is genuine equality of opportunity and that our legal system and judiciary is capable of better corresponding to the community it represents. A career in self-employment at the Bar is attractive for all sorts of reasons, but it should not be beyond the wit of our profession to enable each other to make life choices, such as caring for children or family members or working flexibly, without having a potentially devastating impact on a successful career.
For the Bar Council’s Equality, Diversity & Social Mobility Committee and its Retention Panel in particular, the challenge in relation to women barristers remains finding ways to help women to stay on in the profession. A year ago, the Bar Council’s Snapshot – the experience of self-employed women at the Bar identified similar problems. Women barristers had faced discrimination and harassment, and felt pushed into family and sex crime work in junior practice. Snapshot also highlighted the challenges many women faced in managing a practice while also being a primary carer for children, especially in publicly funded work. Networking opportunities were seen as male-orientated as was the clerking culture, and power balances in chambers were also a factor in limiting women’s ability to reach the heights of the profession.
Thankfully reports of sexual harassment and direct discrimination appear to be reducing, but it is extremely depressing still to read comments such as these from the Bar Council’s ongoing Change of Status survey: ‘There were far fewer opportunities for the same quality of cases and career progression when working part-time which I wanted to do to balance family life.’ ‘After having children, my earnings fell to about 1/10th of what my contemporaries were earning and didn’t cover my childcare costs. I eventually realised that trying to carry on was pointless.’ ‘No regular working hours, no secure or reliable income, no understanding amongst clerks or at court of the challenges facing working mothers, a practice full of warned list trials with a complete inability to plan for childcare, 4-5 hours of travel per day on average. Impossible.’
The Bar Council is working hard to implement the Snapshot recommendations to support women practitioners (see bwloq). Our aim is that anyone who approaches the Bar Council today will get the help and support they need to resolve an issue and maintain a practice. The key message is that if you need help, act early to seek it before an issue becomes intractable and difficult to resolve with chambers.
Further help
The Bar Council Parental Support Hub has details of all assistance currently offered, together with links to policies, guidance and the family career breaks advice pack; Equality & Diversity Helpline: tel 020 7611 1320
Contributor Fiona Jackson, 33 Chancery Lane and Vice Chair of the Bar Council’s Equality, Diversity and Social Mobility Committee
Putting ‘Snapshot’ into practice
Fiona practises in the areas of domestic and international fraud and money laundering, international mutual legal assistance and international regulatory work, proceeds of crime and tracing, civil and criminal asset recovery, business crime and regulatory issues. She is Vice Chair of the Bar Council’s Equality, Diversity and Social Mobility Committee.
Over 1,300 women took the opportunity to respond; almost 80% were self-employed barristers in chambers (see 'Women and the equality rules', Counsel).
In summary, recruitment was generally seen as fair, but awareness of regulatory requirements in chambers to both monitor work allocation and have harassment policies was low. Only a small proportion of those who had experienced harassment or discrimination felt able to report it, citing concern about the impact on their career and prevailing attitudes within the profession.
Experience of flexible working policies in practice was mixed. Awareness of maternity/parental leave policies was found to be high, but many felt that taking such leave had a negative impact on their practice. Consequently a large majority of respondents had contemplated leaving the Bar, especially those from a BAME (black and minority ethnic) background, those who had experienced discrimination or harassment, or were the primary carer for children.
Seizing opportunities for change
The survey should be welcomed for giving another opportunity for women barristers to relate their experiences and drive the agenda for change. The BSB recommendations stemming from the report, apparently due later this year, must be driven by a desire to improve retention, with strong enforcement of the Equality Rules and quick response to legislative change as a priority. For example, the Bar Council has repeatedly pressed for regulation of shared parental leave but the BSB is yet to consult on this issue. Self-employed parents wanting to combine professional practice and duties to chambers with childcare responsibilities continue to encounter difficulties meanwhile. Most respondents reported the Equality Rules have not yet had a significant impact. The report could have done more to explore what our regulator could be doing to help women and it would have been useful to establish when the incidents of harassment and discrimination occurred.
Removing obstacles
The Bar is a highly competitive profession that, in my view, should continue to recruit and retain the best and brightest lawyers solely on merit and regardless of their gender, ethnic background, age, sexual orientation or disability. Where there are any barriers and obstacles still in place that artificially act to distort that equal recruitment and retention, we must act speedily to remove them to ensure that there is genuine equality of opportunity and that our legal system and judiciary is capable of better corresponding to the community it represents. A career in self-employment at the Bar is attractive for all sorts of reasons, but it should not be beyond the wit of our profession to enable each other to make life choices, such as caring for children or family members or working flexibly, without having a potentially devastating impact on a successful career.
For the Bar Council’s Equality, Diversity & Social Mobility Committee and its Retention Panel in particular, the challenge in relation to women barristers remains finding ways to help women to stay on in the profession. A year ago, the Bar Council’s Snapshot – the experience of self-employed women at the Bar identified similar problems. Women barristers had faced discrimination and harassment, and felt pushed into family and sex crime work in junior practice. Snapshot also highlighted the challenges many women faced in managing a practice while also being a primary carer for children, especially in publicly funded work. Networking opportunities were seen as male-orientated as was the clerking culture, and power balances in chambers were also a factor in limiting women’s ability to reach the heights of the profession.
Thankfully reports of sexual harassment and direct discrimination appear to be reducing, but it is extremely depressing still to read comments such as these from the Bar Council’s ongoing Change of Status survey: ‘There were far fewer opportunities for the same quality of cases and career progression when working part-time which I wanted to do to balance family life.’ ‘After having children, my earnings fell to about 1/10th of what my contemporaries were earning and didn’t cover my childcare costs. I eventually realised that trying to carry on was pointless.’ ‘No regular working hours, no secure or reliable income, no understanding amongst clerks or at court of the challenges facing working mothers, a practice full of warned list trials with a complete inability to plan for childcare, 4-5 hours of travel per day on average. Impossible.’
The Bar Council is working hard to implement the Snapshot recommendations to support women practitioners (see bwloq). Our aim is that anyone who approaches the Bar Council today will get the help and support they need to resolve an issue and maintain a practice. The key message is that if you need help, act early to seek it before an issue becomes intractable and difficult to resolve with chambers.
Further help
The Bar Council Parental Support Hub has details of all assistance currently offered, together with links to policies, guidance and the family career breaks advice pack; Equality & Diversity Helpline: tel 020 7611 1320
Contributor Fiona Jackson, 33 Chancery Lane and Vice Chair of the Bar Council’s Equality, Diversity and Social Mobility Committee
Putting ‘Snapshot’ into practice
Time for the Bar to rise to the equality challenge and find more effective ways for women to stay on in the profession, argues Fiona Jackson
In July the Bar Standards Board (BSB) published Women at the Bar, a report of its survey of all practising female barristers on the implementation and effectiveness of the Equality Rules that came into force in 2012.
As we look ahead to Justice Week 2022, the sustainability of the Criminal Bar remains a critical issue for the government to address
Opportunity for female sopranos/contraltos in secondary education, or who have recently finished secondary education but have not yet begun tertiary education. Eligibility includes children of members of the Bar
Fear of the collection and test process is a common factor among clients, especially among vulnerable adults in complex family law cases. Cansford Laboratories shares some tips to help the testing process run as smoothly as possible
Casey Randall explains how complex relationship DNA tests can best be used – and interpreted – by counsel
Casey Randall, Head of DNA at AlphaBiolabs, explores what barristers need to know about DNA testing for immigration, including when a client might wish to submit DNA evidence, and which relationship tests are best for immigration applications
Julian Morgan reminds barristers of the top five areas to consider before 5 April
The case ofR v Brecanihas complicated matters for defence lawyers. Emma Fielding talks to gang culture expert, Dr Simon Harding about County Lines, exploitation and modern slavery
Barristers are particularly at risk of burnout because of the nature of our work and our approach to it but it doesnt have to be this way. Jade Bucklow explores how culture, work and lifestyle changes can rejuvinate our mental health...
The Schools Consent Project (SCP) is educating tens of thousands of teenagers about the law around consent to challenge and change what is now endemic behaviour. Here, its founder, barrister Kate Parker talks to Chris Henley QC about SCPs work and its association with Jodie Comers West End playPrima Facie, in which she plays a criminal barrister who is sexually assaulted
Professionally embarrassed? The circumstances in which criminal barristers may return instructions to appear at trial have become clearer following the Court of Appeal judgment inR v Daniels By Abigail Bright
Following the launch of the Life at the Young Bar report and a nationwide listening exercise, Michael Polak and Michael Harwood outline the Young Barristers Committees raft of initiatives designed to address your issues of concern
