*/
Anyone who is familiar with the QC application process will know that there is a section in the application form called ‘Diversity’. I was aware of this prior to applying, but have to confess that I did not take it seriously. I had assumed that I would be waved through the diversity part, simply on account of being an ethnic minority and having the name ‘Sarabjit Singh’. I had thought that the diversity section would be a tick box exercise and my interviewers would wave me through as soon as they saw me; something that other barristers might need to worry about but not something that I had to lose any sleep over.
I soon discovered, however, that I was very wrong. The diversity ‘competency’ is not a tick box exercise and cannot be ignored by any applicant. In fact, once I realised that just being me wouldn’t be enough, I had no idea what to say. I didn’t have the first clue what the application guidance expected me to do when it said that I had to ‘demonstrate’ an ‘excellent understanding of diversity’. How does anyone do that? And what even was this concept of ‘diversity’ that I was expected to understand and demonstrate? What at first had seemed to be the easiest part of the form now seemed to be the hardest. Eventually I worked out what to do by asking lots of people lots of questions and thinking and reflecting for many hours. Now I am going to tell you what to do to save you all that time.
“The great thing about the diversity competency is that it forces those at the senior junior end to think about problems that exist and do something about them”
‘Diversity’ in the context of the QC application form means the differences between individuals. When people speak of the need for diversity at the Bar, what they mean is the need for the Bar to reflect those differences, eg in gender, race and class, by being representative of society as a whole, so that no one group in society is over or under represented. This is desirable because, amongst other things, it ensures public confidence in the Bar and that the Bar selects from a full talent pool. ‘Diversity’ for the purposes of the QC application form also means that barristers must show an awareness of potential differences in the expectations and needs of the different groups in society who they may encounter in their working lives.
Once it is understood what ‘diversity’ means, how can an applicant ‘demonstrate’ an understanding of it and otherwise satisfy the competency? There are two main things that need to be demonstrated:
Examples of encouraging diversity include setting up mini-pupillage or similar schemes in chambers for underrepresented groups, giving talks about the Bar in state schools, getting involved in social mobility initiatives and mentoring.
A particular problem for the Bar is the large drop-out rate for women of 15+ years’ call, which results in a gender imbalance at the senior end, so any steps taken to encourage the retention of female tenants (particularly after maternity leave) would be good examples of encouraging diversity.
If you are thinking of applying for silk, you may already be able to think of numerous examples of your admirable efforts in this regard. If not, get working now to show that you understand and encourage diversity. The great thing about the competency is that it forces those at the senior junior end of the Bar who want to apply for silk to think about the problems that exist in respect of diversity and it makes them do something about them. For lots of us, doing something about them also happens to be a fun and rewarding experience that we continue as silks. Even those of us who began thinking that all they needed to do was be called Sarabjit Singh.
Sarabjit Singh was called in 2001, appointed silk in 2018 and practises in tax, public law and clinical negligence from the chambers of Richard Booth QC at 1 Crown Office Row
Anyone who is familiar with the QC application process will know that there is a section in the application form called ‘Diversity’. I was aware of this prior to applying, but have to confess that I did not take it seriously. I had assumed that I would be waved through the diversity part, simply on account of being an ethnic minority and having the name ‘Sarabjit Singh’. I had thought that the diversity section would be a tick box exercise and my interviewers would wave me through as soon as they saw me; something that other barristers might need to worry about but not something that I had to lose any sleep over.
I soon discovered, however, that I was very wrong. The diversity ‘competency’ is not a tick box exercise and cannot be ignored by any applicant. In fact, once I realised that just being me wouldn’t be enough, I had no idea what to say. I didn’t have the first clue what the application guidance expected me to do when it said that I had to ‘demonstrate’ an ‘excellent understanding of diversity’. How does anyone do that? And what even was this concept of ‘diversity’ that I was expected to understand and demonstrate? What at first had seemed to be the easiest part of the form now seemed to be the hardest. Eventually I worked out what to do by asking lots of people lots of questions and thinking and reflecting for many hours. Now I am going to tell you what to do to save you all that time.
“The great thing about the diversity competency is that it forces those at the senior junior end to think about problems that exist and do something about them”
‘Diversity’ in the context of the QC application form means the differences between individuals. When people speak of the need for diversity at the Bar, what they mean is the need for the Bar to reflect those differences, eg in gender, race and class, by being representative of society as a whole, so that no one group in society is over or under represented. This is desirable because, amongst other things, it ensures public confidence in the Bar and that the Bar selects from a full talent pool. ‘Diversity’ for the purposes of the QC application form also means that barristers must show an awareness of potential differences in the expectations and needs of the different groups in society who they may encounter in their working lives.
Once it is understood what ‘diversity’ means, how can an applicant ‘demonstrate’ an understanding of it and otherwise satisfy the competency? There are two main things that need to be demonstrated:
Examples of encouraging diversity include setting up mini-pupillage or similar schemes in chambers for underrepresented groups, giving talks about the Bar in state schools, getting involved in social mobility initiatives and mentoring.
A particular problem for the Bar is the large drop-out rate for women of 15+ years’ call, which results in a gender imbalance at the senior end, so any steps taken to encourage the retention of female tenants (particularly after maternity leave) would be good examples of encouraging diversity.
If you are thinking of applying for silk, you may already be able to think of numerous examples of your admirable efforts in this regard. If not, get working now to show that you understand and encourage diversity. The great thing about the competency is that it forces those at the senior junior end of the Bar who want to apply for silk to think about the problems that exist in respect of diversity and it makes them do something about them. For lots of us, doing something about them also happens to be a fun and rewarding experience that we continue as silks. Even those of us who began thinking that all they needed to do was be called Sarabjit Singh.
The Bar Council will press for investment in justice at party conferences, the Chancellor’s Budget and Spending Review
Equip yourself for your new career at the Bar
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth explores some key steps to take when starting out as a barrister in order to secure your financial future
Millicent Wild of 5 Essex Chambers describes her pupillage experience
Drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Juno Women’s Aid in Nottingham as part of its Giving Back campaign
Casedo explains how to hit the ground running on your next case with a four-step plan to transform the way you work
If you are in/about to start pupillage, you will soon be facing the pupillage stage assessment in professional ethics. Jane Hutton and Patrick Ryan outline exam format and tactics
In a two-part opinion series, James Onalaja considers the International Criminal Court Prosecutor’s requests for arrest warrants in the controversial Israel-Palestine situation
Daniel Barnett serves up a host of summer shows
Britain needs to get over its shameful denial of racism, call it what it is and start to effectively deal with the problem, says Vithyah Chelvam
An epic failure of public policy has filled our crumbling prisons to capacity, says Lord Ken Macdonald KC. How did we get here, and what might reform look like?
