*/
Anyone who is familiar with the QC application process will know that there is a section in the application form called ‘Diversity’. I was aware of this prior to applying, but have to confess that I did not take it seriously. I had assumed that I would be waved through the diversity part, simply on account of being an ethnic minority and having the name ‘Sarabjit Singh’. I had thought that the diversity section would be a tick box exercise and my interviewers would wave me through as soon as they saw me; something that other barristers might need to worry about but not something that I had to lose any sleep over.
I soon discovered, however, that I was very wrong. The diversity ‘competency’ is not a tick box exercise and cannot be ignored by any applicant. In fact, once I realised that just being me wouldn’t be enough, I had no idea what to say. I didn’t have the first clue what the application guidance expected me to do when it said that I had to ‘demonstrate’ an ‘excellent understanding of diversity’. How does anyone do that? And what even was this concept of ‘diversity’ that I was expected to understand and demonstrate? What at first had seemed to be the easiest part of the form now seemed to be the hardest. Eventually I worked out what to do by asking lots of people lots of questions and thinking and reflecting for many hours. Now I am going to tell you what to do to save you all that time.
“The great thing about the diversity competency is that it forces those at the senior junior end to think about problems that exist and do something about them”
‘Diversity’ in the context of the QC application form means the differences between individuals. When people speak of the need for diversity at the Bar, what they mean is the need for the Bar to reflect those differences, eg in gender, race and class, by being representative of society as a whole, so that no one group in society is over or under represented. This is desirable because, amongst other things, it ensures public confidence in the Bar and that the Bar selects from a full talent pool. ‘Diversity’ for the purposes of the QC application form also means that barristers must show an awareness of potential differences in the expectations and needs of the different groups in society who they may encounter in their working lives.
Once it is understood what ‘diversity’ means, how can an applicant ‘demonstrate’ an understanding of it and otherwise satisfy the competency? There are two main things that need to be demonstrated:
Examples of encouraging diversity include setting up mini-pupillage or similar schemes in chambers for underrepresented groups, giving talks about the Bar in state schools, getting involved in social mobility initiatives and mentoring.
A particular problem for the Bar is the large drop-out rate for women of 15+ years’ call, which results in a gender imbalance at the senior end, so any steps taken to encourage the retention of female tenants (particularly after maternity leave) would be good examples of encouraging diversity.
If you are thinking of applying for silk, you may already be able to think of numerous examples of your admirable efforts in this regard. If not, get working now to show that you understand and encourage diversity. The great thing about the competency is that it forces those at the senior junior end of the Bar who want to apply for silk to think about the problems that exist in respect of diversity and it makes them do something about them. For lots of us, doing something about them also happens to be a fun and rewarding experience that we continue as silks. Even those of us who began thinking that all they needed to do was be called Sarabjit Singh.
Sarabjit Singh was called in 2001, appointed silk in 2018 and practises in tax, public law and clinical negligence from the chambers of Richard Booth QC at 1 Crown Office Row
Anyone who is familiar with the QC application process will know that there is a section in the application form called ‘Diversity’. I was aware of this prior to applying, but have to confess that I did not take it seriously. I had assumed that I would be waved through the diversity part, simply on account of being an ethnic minority and having the name ‘Sarabjit Singh’. I had thought that the diversity section would be a tick box exercise and my interviewers would wave me through as soon as they saw me; something that other barristers might need to worry about but not something that I had to lose any sleep over.
I soon discovered, however, that I was very wrong. The diversity ‘competency’ is not a tick box exercise and cannot be ignored by any applicant. In fact, once I realised that just being me wouldn’t be enough, I had no idea what to say. I didn’t have the first clue what the application guidance expected me to do when it said that I had to ‘demonstrate’ an ‘excellent understanding of diversity’. How does anyone do that? And what even was this concept of ‘diversity’ that I was expected to understand and demonstrate? What at first had seemed to be the easiest part of the form now seemed to be the hardest. Eventually I worked out what to do by asking lots of people lots of questions and thinking and reflecting for many hours. Now I am going to tell you what to do to save you all that time.
“The great thing about the diversity competency is that it forces those at the senior junior end to think about problems that exist and do something about them”
‘Diversity’ in the context of the QC application form means the differences between individuals. When people speak of the need for diversity at the Bar, what they mean is the need for the Bar to reflect those differences, eg in gender, race and class, by being representative of society as a whole, so that no one group in society is over or under represented. This is desirable because, amongst other things, it ensures public confidence in the Bar and that the Bar selects from a full talent pool. ‘Diversity’ for the purposes of the QC application form also means that barristers must show an awareness of potential differences in the expectations and needs of the different groups in society who they may encounter in their working lives.
Once it is understood what ‘diversity’ means, how can an applicant ‘demonstrate’ an understanding of it and otherwise satisfy the competency? There are two main things that need to be demonstrated:
Examples of encouraging diversity include setting up mini-pupillage or similar schemes in chambers for underrepresented groups, giving talks about the Bar in state schools, getting involved in social mobility initiatives and mentoring.
A particular problem for the Bar is the large drop-out rate for women of 15+ years’ call, which results in a gender imbalance at the senior end, so any steps taken to encourage the retention of female tenants (particularly after maternity leave) would be good examples of encouraging diversity.
If you are thinking of applying for silk, you may already be able to think of numerous examples of your admirable efforts in this regard. If not, get working now to show that you understand and encourage diversity. The great thing about the competency is that it forces those at the senior junior end of the Bar who want to apply for silk to think about the problems that exist in respect of diversity and it makes them do something about them. For lots of us, doing something about them also happens to be a fun and rewarding experience that we continue as silks. Even those of us who began thinking that all they needed to do was be called Sarabjit Singh.
The Chair of the Bar reports back
Clement Cowley, Partner at The Penny Group, explains how global events can influence the performance of pensions and ISAs, and why taking a long-term approach to investing is often the most effective strategy
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, discusses what family law professionals need to know about hallucinogens, from the main hallucinogenic drugs encountered in family proceedings, to their effects and the testing options available
Harmony Christian Ministries is the latest charity to benefit from a £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs via the company’s Giving Back initiative
By David Green
Mário Barroso, Head of R&D and Method Development at AlphaBiolabs, examines the forensic science underpinning hair drug testing, its evidential scope and limitations, and why it remains the gold standard for evidencing patterns of drug use in family proceedings
Developing a tech start-up demands a different definition of excellence to the Bar, says Saara Idelbi. The co-creator of Advocatr on entrepreneurship, AI advocacy training, and matching the thrill of a killer cross-examination
At the start of her term, Chair of the Bar 2026 Kirsty Brimelow KC set out a series of priorities for the year ahead. One of those priorities was children in the justice system
As the world becomes more digital, Barbara Vinagre Mota examines international research into the mental health consequences of judges’ exposure to graphic and immersive evidence, highlighting the importance of support systems
Reviewed by Daniel Barnett
James McNeill Whistler at Tate Britain until 27 September Rothko in Florence at Palazzo Strozzi until 23 August Reviewed by Stephen Cragg KC
